Re: Frequencies of elements / WAS [electroherbalism] FrequencyLists

[Guest guest]

I thought I would add a little to Char's post as MRI is a complex

subject by itself.

Char no doubt is the real subject matter expert here and I would

like to meet her sometime. Her posts are technical master works. I

thank her very much.

The frequencies generated by MRI (Larmar) are NOT linear atomic

motion, but result from procession (for lack of a better word) after

alignment with a static external magnetic field. Much like a

wobbling top. Thus the term spin.

The magnetic fields are intense. Earths field is measured in micro

(millionths)Teslas. The MRI produces these fields using supercooling

to make super conductors, thus super magnets.

The frequency pickups are called SQUIDS and are the most sensitive

devices known to man.

Lastly if one extrapolates Larmar frequencies to low static fields,

the frequencies do drop off to much lower frequencies, and these are

in the range of Rife frequencies. Interesting stuff.

In short, the " frequency " of the atom spin is a function of the

magnetic field. A remotly related device is the proton procession

magnetometer, a type of metal detector that uses low magnetic fields.

For what it is worth.

Al Sledge

--------------

> Hello rifers,

>

> There have been several posts in recent months inquiring

about " frequencies for the elements " . Various replies pointed to

what's called " Larmour " or the " nuclear magnetic " resonance

frequencies of some of the elements. However, there are some

serious misconceptions developing in the Rife community about these

frequencies. Very briefly, here are some problems.

>

> A nuclear magnetic resonant (NMR) frequency response can only be

excited in the presence of an external magnetic field. The

frequency depends on the strength of that external field. In other

words, if a person at one location is in the presence of a certain

field strength, and a person on the other side of the planet is in

the presence of a different field strength, the two NMR frequencies

will be totally different.

> ....

> But to give one important and simple example. One the

aforementioned list, the resonant frequency for oxygen is given as

13.557 Mhz in a field of 2.3488 tesla. (Other frequencies are given

for lesser field strengths). The problem here is this - these

frequencies are only applicable to the very rare oxygen-17 isotope,

which has a presence in nature of a mere 0.038% of all oxygen. In

no way does it apply to the very common oxygen-16 isotope, which

constitutes 99.762% of all oxygen in nature. The oxygen-16 nucleus

is actually incapable of displaying a nuclear magnetic resonant

response. So, to imply therefore that the frequencies for oxygen in

this list (even if the exact external magnetic field WAS known), are

applicable in any way whatsoever to rifing - or any device frequency

emission excitation, is a huge misconception.

>

>......

> The obvious conclusion then - is that for the rifing purposes

desired by most people on these email lists, this proposal to use

NMR-related frequencies for the isotopes that DO respond is

worthless, especially since the exact strength of any external

magnetic field would not be known to most people (unless someone had

sophisticated testing equipment). And then, they would have to be

informed about which elemental isotopes are (or are not) capable of

responding to an external magnetic field. The nuclei of certain

important biological elements, including carbon-12, oxygen-16, and

calcium-40, will have no response at all.

>

> Char

>

>

>

>

http://www.electroherbalism.com/Bioelectronics/FrequenciesandAnecdote

s/Non-ConsolidatedFrequencyList.htm

>

> Three quarters down the list is the information you seek.

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> >

> > Are there lists of the resonant frequencies of the elements,

> > especially those essential to human biology? TIA.

>

>

>