Are you for or against the QXCI?

[Guest guest]

No expert here...

The QXCI is a radionics machine. Radionics is about your mind and it's

intent. You do not need a $14,000 (or more?) machine to use radionics.

Look up radionics on the web. An interesting system whose developer is

very up front on what it is doing is the Co-Re at

http://www.bioenergeticmedicine.org/

Another interesting machine is the ABPA at

http://www.biophotonanalyzer.com/products.htm and

http://www.biophotonanalyzer.com/

I have no financial interest in any of these machines.

Oh yeah, the QXCI puts out no frequencies.

good luck

>

>

> I have just started treatment with someone using a QXCI and wondered

> what people here think of this device? There are many experts in

> this group, and I value your opinion on the QXCI.

>

> My hope was that this could supplement my GB4000, but the frequencies

> this device applies are " blinded " so to speak.

>

> FT

[Guest guest]

I truly dislike making a post that should have been unnecessary in

the first place, but I can't stand by and chance that someone would

not get the help they need because they believed a post made by

someone who is obviously ignorant of the facts concerning the

subject. The 13k I spent for our QXCI and the 7k spent for training

(so far) is the best investment I have ever made. Its effectiveness

is made obvious by the client following developed over the past 3

years. Yes the QXCI can work by radionics, however anyone with

virtually any experience knows that it is significantly more

effective " in harness " . That is all I will say in the group on this

subject, but I can certainly be contacted directly if anyone wants

to discuss this any further. Also in clarification, there is a lot

more to radionics than " about your mind and it's intent " if you are

using a device like the Hi-Life. That is also all I will say on the

group about this off-topic and off-base remark. Namaste, Ted

> >

> >

> > I have just started treatment with someone using a QXCI and

wondered

> > what people here think of this device? There are many experts

in

> > this group, and I value your opinion on the QXCI.

> >

> > My hope was that this could supplement my GB4000, but the

frequencies

> > this device applies are " blinded " so to speak.

> >

> > FT

[Guest guest]

QXCI is more than radionics, also is electroacupunture.

Another advanced gear is http://www.rejuvenetics.us/products.html

greetings

> >

> >

> > I have just started treatment with someone using a QXCI and

wondered

> > what people here think of this device? There are many experts in

> > this group, and I value your opinion on the QXCI.

> >

> > My hope was that this could supplement my GB4000, but the

frequencies

> > this device applies are " blinded " so to speak.

> >

> > FT

[Guest guest]

Hello Ted,

" Obviously ignorant " or just disagrees with you? I guess if I had that

much money invested I would be touchy also! The gentleman asked for

opinions and I gave him mine.

" Also in clarification, there is a lot more to radionics than " about

your mind and it's intent " " - Yes, this is a simplification but

basically true. Notice I mentioned the ABPA which theoretically

operates without much in the way intent etc. Also note that I did not

say that no results were to be had with the QXCI. If a radionics

practitioner can benefit from one of the many tools out there –

so be it. My point is that the QXCI is mostly smoke and mirrors and

expensive and the work can be done without it or with equipment that

is a whole lot cheaper.

The harness is a stage prop, which since it affects the perceptions of

the users (their mind), can be helpful.

I have a friend that was a distributor for the QXCI and used one in

his practice. After many years he quit selling them and sold his

personal unit saying that he was tired of having using a machine when

he could do it without the machine.

I notice that I did misread the intent of the original post. Most

equipment inquires on these boards are from persons interested in

buying the equipment. The equipment a practitioner uses is secondary

to the skills of the practitioner.

Regards,

Dave

> > >

> > >

> > > I have just started treatment with someone using a QXCI and

> wondered

> > > what people here think of this device? There are many experts

> in

> > > this group, and I value your opinion on the QXCI.

> > >

> > > My hope was that this could supplement my GB4000, but the

> frequencies

> > > this device applies are " blinded " so to speak.

> > >

> > > FT

[Guest guest]

I observed a QXCI/SCIO session today and the machine delivers, or claims to

deliver frequencies. What I want to know is if it is possible for a computer

program to deliver frequencies. The recipient wears probes at the ankles, wrists

and forehead made of plastic. Anyone know?

Thanks

Barbara