Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 Ken Uzzell wrote: > Greetings, > > I have seen the term " pond bugs " used lately in numerous discussions. Some > of these discussions appear to negate the importance of killing pond bugs > with Rife technology. > > Can someone advise me what " pond bugs " are, and why its not important if > they die when we use our frequency machines on them? > Pond bugs are just that, microscopic organisms of the protozoa class that are found in ponds. It is important to be able to kill them with our frequency machines, but only as an initial step. It's like my suggestion to use baker's yeast; it's a convenient test sample. What we're generally interested in killing though is pathogenic microorganisms of human disease, which includes protozoa, such as malaria. My objection wasn't in using 'pond bugs' as a test sample. My objection was in remaining at that level rather than progressing to the next step. If someone followed my suggestion and used baker's yeast as a test sample, that would only be good as a first step. The next step would be to work with something like candida yeast. Of course if someone is qualified and has the resources, they should work directly with pathogenic microorganisms. The pond bugs and baker's yeast is for us lay researchers who are not equipped to work with dangerous samples. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 Wouldn't it be easy to use the Fscan to find the MOR of yeast? Then with this frequency we could all nuke our samples and see how it goes? If the Fscan only picks up in the Hulda range then we could still average down the MOR and see how it goes on plasma under 10kHz. This is a pretty easy thing to do, isn't it? Regards Ken From: " Ringas " > Pond bugs are just that, microscopic organisms of the protozoa class > that are found in ponds. It is important to be able to kill them with > our frequency machines, but only as an initial step. It's like my > suggestion to use baker's yeast; it's a convenient test sample. What > we're generally interested in killing though is pathogenic > microorganisms of human disease, which includes protozoa, such as > malaria. My objection wasn't in using 'pond bugs' as a test sample. My > objection was in remaining at that level rather than progressing to the > next step. If someone followed my suggestion and used baker's yeast as > a test sample, that would only be good as a first step. The next step > would be to work with something like candida yeast. Of course if > someone is qualified and has the resources, they should work directly > with pathogenic microorganisms. The pond bugs and baker's yeast is for > us lay researchers who are not equipped to work with dangerous samples. > > Regards, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 What a wonderful instrument! It's right there at resonance and more by the looks of it. No wonder these frequency machines are working so well. Ken > Bakers yeast has a natural vibration rate of around 1000 Hz. This was > determined by Sonocytology at UCLA. Can read about this method of finding > natural vibration rates on the web. This particular vibration rate may not > be the MOR! May only affect it in some other manner, perhaps not even kill > or deactivate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 Dave's thoughts .. The typical " pond bug " of interest for frequency work is the paramecium, a one-celled animal perhaps 50x or more larger than a bacteria. Paramecium are large enough to be seen with a 100x microscope, and big enough to be easily visible blowing up with frequency energy, which Crane did (unfortunately, calling the paramecium bacteria) using contact electrodes, and which Dr. Bare has done with the Bare/Rife device from a meter or so distance - there is video of this on his website. I think the importance here is that one can prove the effects on single-celled creatures as large as a paramecium with frequencies. Does it work on smaller objects? We haven't seen that yet under the microscope, but we certainly see effects in the human organism - I believe from the boosting of the immune system, and possibly from the pathogens " leaking " , thus allowing the body's defenses to come get to work. So far, my experiments with the very safe and easily available safe strain of e.coli cells in culture have had no major results using either a Bare/Rife OR an EMEM device, nor have two other types of radiant devices had any large effect, using frequencies as high as 90 Khz. Work continues as time is available. Dave http://www.dfe.net Ken Uzzell wrote: > Greetings, > > I have seen the term " pond bugs " used lately in numerous discussions. Some > of these discussions appear to negate the importance of killing pond bugs > with Rife technology. > > Can someone advise me what " pond bugs " are, and why its not important if > they die when we use our frequency machines on them? > > Regards > Ken > http://www.heal-me.com.au/frex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 Ken Uzzell wrote: > Wouldn't it be easy to use the Fscan to find the MOR of yeast? Then with > this frequency we could all nuke our samples and see how it goes? > > If the Fscan only picks up in the Hulda range then we could still > average down the MOR and see how it goes on plasma under 10kHz. > > This is a pretty easy thing to do, isn't it? > I would love to see this tried out. If the Fscan could be used to determine true MORs in vitro, it would be a major breakthrough in Rife research. If anyone tries it, don't forget to scan a control sample of uninoculated culture medium. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 rifetech@... wrote: > , > > Bakers yeast has a natural vibration rate of around 1000 Hz. This was > determined by Sonocytology at UCLA. Can read about this method of finding > natural vibration rates on the web. This particular vibration rate may not > be the MOR! May only affect it in some other manner, perhaps not even kill > or deactivate it. > > I don't remember if I used that frequency when I was doing my experiments. It certainly wouldn't hurt to try it. >>It's like my >>suggestion to use baker's yeast; it's a convenient test sample. What >>we're generally interested in killing though is pathogenic >>microorganisms of human disease, which includes protozoa, such as >>malaria. > > > Actually worked out the frequencies for Falciparum malaria several years > ago. They work great! Would clear someone clincally and symptomatically > with 3 exposures over a 36 hour period. Tried to set up a clinical in > Africa. Got the Dr's , hospitals, enough funding, and wrote up a proposal. > Whole business slammed into a wall of govt red tape and indifference. We > were outsiders, doing something radically different, and lacked enough of > the proper incentives to get them interested. > That's a great shame! That would have been a perfect opportunity to show the world what can really be done with this technology. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2004 Report Share Posted September 9, 2004 Hi Dave, I really like the look of your Bare/Rife machine. 300watts at the bulb - this would be getting the signal out well I would think. A lot better than my Bare/Rife machine. Are EMF vibrations the same as resonance/fluorescence emissions? I'm not good with all the terms used, my friend building our scanner is always correcting my rape of electronic jargon. Those radio telescopes are amazing instruments, I didn't know they used freezing cold sensors to reduce noise. Regards Ken ----- Original Message ----- > Would bet the sound level of the bakers yeast is so low that it had to be well isolated from any background noise to be picked up. Probably it's own metabolic noise from the chemical reactions of cell division etc. > > This noise would be acoustic, compared to an EMF vibration it's acoustic energy level would be much higher. > > Although the Fscan is supposed to pick up EMF vibrations I've always thought that this would be impossible due to the fact that background EMF noise would be to high and impossible to filter out. Would be like trying to hear a pin drop with a train going by. If this were possible it would change everything, you would be able to identify everything and anything by frequency print. > > This is done allot with sound and light imaging but at the level of EMF imaging it's a whole different ball game. Usually as with radio astronomy the sensors have to be cooled to near absolute zero to eliminate the back round noise. > > Dave T. > > & Trebing > vibrnthealth@... > http://www.home.earthlink.net/~vibrnthealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2004 Report Share Posted September 11, 2004 > Hi Dave, > > I really like the look of your Bare/Rife machine. 300watts at the bulb - > this would be getting the signal out well I would think. A lot better than > my Bare/Rife machine. The R/b killed the achy flu feeling i had the other day, and i swore that it would be a 5 day thing. I was flying around by the end of the day..... we are using it on a friend with Lymes, and He said that there is " movement " of the germs. He is early in the treatment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.