HPV Vaccine at odds with Evidence Based Medicine?

[Guest guest]

New article in the ls of Medicine<http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/07853890.2011.645353>from a post by Dave Mihalovic, a Naturopathic doctor: Key messages the researchers report include a lack of evidence for any HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer and lack of evaluation of health risks.Especially in the presence of an extremely effective screening tool (Pap smear) there is no evidence of additional benefit of vaccination.The list of serious adverse reactions related to HPV vaccination worldwide includes deaths, convulsions, paraesthesia, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), transverse myelitis, facial palsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, anaphylaxis, autoimmune disorders, deep

vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and [drum roll please~ Liora] cervical cancers."The authors conclude by summing up their evidence and stating that the presentation of partial and non-factual information regarding cervical cancer risks and the usefulness of HPV vaccines, as cited above, is neither scientific nor ethical. None of these practices serve public health interests, nor are they likely to reduce the levels of cervical cancer. Independent evaluation [they mean, beyond manufacturer-sponsored studies, that are long term] of HPV vaccine safety is urgently needed and should be a priority for government sponsored research programmes. Any future vaccination policies should adhere more rigorously to evidence-based medicine as well as strictly follow ethical guidelines for informed consent."

all the Best in Health,Liora Pearlman , ModeratorMomPlease consider calling me at 5130 3931 or texting 139 1030 6022 if it is time sensitive.