Guest guest Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/04/27/low.flying.plane/index.html White House apologizes for low-flying plane updated 8:22 p.m. EDT, Mon April 27, 2009 By Mythili Rao CNN NEW YORK (CNN) -- A White House official apologized Monday after a low-flying Boeing 747 spotted above the Manhattan skyline frightened workers and residents into evacuating buildings. The huge aircraft, which functions as Air Force One when the president is aboard, was taking part in a classified, government-sanctioned photo shoot, the Federal Aviation Administration said. " Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision, " said Louis Caldera, director of the White House Military Office. " While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it's clear that the mission created confusion and disruption. " Witnesses reported seeing the plane circle over the Upper New York Bay near the Statue of Liberty before flying up the Hudson River. It was accompanied by two F-16s. Two officials told CNN the White House Military Office was trying to update its file photos of Air Force One. The officials said the president was angry when he learned Monday afternoon about the flight, which sparked fear in the New York-New Jersey area. " The president was furious about it, " one of the officials said. The incident outraged many New Yorkers, including Mayor Bloomberg. " First thing is, I'm annoyed -- furious is a better word -- that I wasn't told, " he said, calling the aviation administration's decision to withhold details about the flight " ridiculous " and " poor judgment. " " Why the Defense Department wanted to do a photo op right around the site of the World Trade Center defies the imagination, " he said. " Had we known, I would have asked them not to. " " I was here on 9/11, " said iReporter Tom Kruk, who spotted the plane as he was getting coffee Monday morning and snapped a photo. Kruk called the sight of the aircraft low in the sky " unsettling. " -Rose, a social worker who counsels post-traumatic stress disorder patients in an office just three blocks from where the World Trade Center towers once stood, called the flight an " absolute travesty. " " There was no warning. It looked like the plane was about to come into us, " she said. " I'm a therapist, and I actually had a panic attack. " -Rose, who works with nearly two dozen post-traumatic stress disorder patients ages 15 to 47, said she was inundated with phone calls from patients Monday morning. " They're traumatized. They're asking 'How could this happen?' They're nervous. Their anxiety levels are high, " she said. -Rose is considering filing a class-action suit against the government for sanctioning the plane's unannounced flight. " I believe the government has done something really wrong, " she said. Capt. Carpenter of s Air Force Base said local law enforcement agencies and the Federal Aviation Administration had been given notice of the exercise. New York Police Deputy Commissioner J. Browne said the department had been alerted to the flight by the federal agency " with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it. " Sen. Chuck Schumer echoed the mayor's sentiments in a separate news conference Monday afternoon, saying the Federal Aviation Administration should have notified the public to avoid panic. " It is absolutely outrageous and appalling to think that the FAA would plan such a photo shoot and not warn the public, knowing full well New Yorkers still have the vivid memory of 9/11 sketched in their minds, " the New York Democrat said. Schumer said the FAA's decision to not announce the fly-by " really borders on being either cruel or very very stupid. " Building evacuations also took place across the Hudson River in Jersey City, New Jersey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 Ok, yes, it was needless that they would do this photo shoot in that location and that context. Heck, it wouldn't have been that hard to do green screen photography: I suspect no news station with a weather forecast goes without doing exactly that every time. But, going by the same logic, I'd have grounds to sue all users of large tower construction cranes that moved or even looked like they were about to move, wherever I go, because I had been traumatized by having one falling directly on top of me, only separated by the frame of the apartment building I lived in that kept me from being harmed while absorbing most of the blow (though my top floor neighbor didn't survive to have mental side-effects). We don't need richer lawyers! > -Rose, a social worker who counsels post-traumatic stress disorder patients in an office just three blocks from where the World Trade Center towers once stood, called the flight an " absolute travesty. " > > " There was no warning. It looked like the plane was about to come into us, " she said. " I'm a therapist, and I actually had a panic attack. " > > -Rose, who works with nearly two dozen post-traumatic stress disorder patients ages 15 to 47, said she was inundated with phone calls from patients Monday morning. > > " They're traumatized. They're asking 'How could this happen?' They're nervous. Their anxiety levels are high, " she said. > > -Rose is considering filing a class-action suit against the government for sanctioning the plane's unannounced flight. " I believe the government has done something really wrong, " she said. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2009 Report Share Posted April 28, 2009 There are companies, of there used to be, that would give aerial tours of cities and others that would take high quality pictures of cities from the air. This is probably what they were doing with Air Force One, actually one of the backup planes. It would have been possible to use special effects or to photoshop AF1 onto an existing commercial image of the city, but it would have looked terrible. The whole point of this is that it could have so easily been avoided if someone in the administration had simply bothered to get on the phone with the mayor's office, the FAA, and whoever else to get the clearances. Since effectively the president would be asking, it isn't likely they'd be told no. Were they worried about a terrorist trying to shoot the plane down with a missile if they learned of the schedule? Maybe, but exceedingly unlikely. Why, if they even had such a plan, bother executing it to shoot down an empty plane when they could wait for the real deal? In a message dated 4/28/2009 3:49:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, no_reply writes: Ok, yes, it was needless that they would do this photo shoot in that location and that context. Heck, it wouldn't have been that hard to do green screen photography: I suspect no news station with a weather forecast goes without doing exactly that every time. An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.