Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 if they abuse drugs or alcohol it means their ability to function as a nurse will be compromised. What happens when they are at work hung over, drunk or stoned, or if they are so fixated on their next drink or high that patient care suffers? They should really be fired, but I suppose they have to be kept because of the nursing shortage. In a message dated 5/12/2009 3:38:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, no_reply writes: The union is upset that the agency that regulates Manitoba nurses puts their names in a magazine and online when they are disciplined.Union president Sandi Mowat says the public should know about serious offences such as patient abuse, but people who are addicted to drugs or alcohol should not have their names broadcast for all to see. A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 " If they abuse drugs or alcohol it means their ability to function as a nurse will be compromised. What happens when they are at work hung over, drunk or stoned, or if they are so fixated on their next drink or high that patient care suffers? They should really be fired, but I suppose they have to be kept because of the nursing shortage. " Canada appears to be more lenient about punishing crimes of any kind. However, I think there is plenty of abuse by doctors and nurses in the US too, but it mostly goes unreported unless it impairs performance substantially. Sometimes, the medical field can be like a fraternity with everyone knowing that some need the uppers to pull long shifts, and downers to sleep between them. I am sure many of the screw-ups which result in malpractice suits are the result of this sort of drug use. Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 The article states: " ... <snip> ... Union president Sandi Mowat says the public should know about serious offences such as patient abuse, but people who are addicted to drugs or alcohol should not have their names broadcast for all to see ... <snip> ... " Let's see now. Someone who is addicted to drugs and/or alcohol is going to put that addiction ahead of everything else in his or her life including any patients to whom they are assigned. This means that the patient is in danger which is abusive as patients are rarely able to care for themselves when they find themselves under the care of a nurse in a hospital or clinic setting. It would stand to reason then that publishing the names of nurses who are disciplined due to problems arising out of addiction(s) is indeed making the public aware of serious offences that include patient abuse. Raven Co-Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 > > Let's see now. Someone who is addicted to drugs and/or alcohol is going to put that addiction ahead of everything else in his or her life including any patients to whom they are assigned. > etal> > Raven > Co-Administrator > aside from everything else that raven said that made perfect sense. If it will embarrass you to have it known publicly (stop) Why is it your right to keep a decision making handicap known or judgement imparing ongoing choices known. Maybe when you are clean they can print a congratulations! If someone really wants to quit others not tempting them would be benefitial too (B/c they know you are working through something) But if you can't have it be known don't do it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.