Guest guest Posted September 16, 2005 Report Share Posted September 16, 2005 Refer to specialist if pain lasts more than three months, expert says Rheumawire Sep 16, 2005 Gandey Boston, MA - As newer pain subspecialties crop up, clinicians have more options than ever for addressing patient pain. Preventing chronic pain leading to nerve damage and sensitization of the central nervous system is at the heart of the multifaceted process of relieving patients. " Pain management is a growing field, " Dr Aneesh Singla (Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston) told rheumawire, " and it is important that clinicians be aware of the many options available to them. " Singla maintains that if pain persists for more than three months, it is likely time for referral to a pain specialist. Singla groups pain specialists into four main categories anesthesiology, neurology, psychiatry, and physiatry and he points to the growing number of minimally invasive options. Among these is radiofrequency ablation, which Singla and colleagues believe offers a " new and promising approach for the treatment of low back pain. " The researchers make the comment in a letter published in the September 1, 2005 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine [1]. Responding to a previous article in the journal that questioned the efficacy of the procedure for low back pain [2], they say that many of the past studies of this procedure had methodological flaws. During an interview with rheumawire, Singla noted that, overall, the evidence for radiofrequency ablation has been conflicting. He cited four key articles from the literature and noted that two have shown benefit and two others have not [3,4,5,6]. " Each of these studies had different selection criteria, however, " Singla said. " I think that once we start implementing more rigorous and consistent selection criteria, we are going to find that this is a promising new therapy for select patients. " Low risk/benefit ratio and low costs In a lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy, the surgeon places a needlelike tube called a cannula near the targeted medial branch. A radiofrequency electrode is inserted down the cannula. The surgeon then sends enough electricity through the electrode to heat the nerve. The theory is that by stopping the nerve signals coming from the facet joint, pain in the area stops. In the original article that prompted the correspondence, Dr Eugene Carragee (Stanford University School of Medicine, CA) writes, " Radiofrequency ablation of the small nerves to the facet joints was ineffective in one randomized trial and showed a moderate effect (6% improvement in disability scores), which lasted only four weeks, in another. " He continues, " Although data are insufficient, some authors have suggested a possible benefit of neuroablation of the facet joint in the extremely small subgroup of patients with chronic low back pain who respond to placebo-controlled anesthetic blocks. " In their letter, Singla and colleagues outline problems with previous studies, including concerns over selection criteria, which may have downplayed the efficacy of the therapy in specific subgroups. They write, " Our opinion of minimally invasive treatment options (injections and neuroablation procedures) differs from Carragee's. The potential advantages of these treatments include low risk/benefit ratios and relatively low costs. " Responding to the group's letter, Carragee writes, " It is possible that this screening method resulted in the inclusion of subjects who did not have true facet-joint pain and thus might account for the lack of efficacy. However, it may be that the procedure is relatively ineffective even in subjects with true facet-joint pain. " Singla and colleagues write, " We fully acknowledge that more clinical studies are needed to support this new and promising approach for low back pain. " Sources 1. Singla AK, Stojanovic M, Barna S. Persistent low back pain. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:956-957. 2. Carragee EJ. Clinical practice: Persistent low back pain. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1891-1898. 3. Van Wijk RM, Geurts JW, Wynne HJ, et al. Radiofrequency denervation of lumbar facet joints in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A randomized, double-blind, sham lesion-controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2005; 21:335-344. 4. Leclaire R, Fortin L, Lambert R, et al. Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain: A placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy. Spine 2001; 26:1411-1416. 5. Van Kleef M, Barendse GA, Kessels A, et al. Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain. Spine 1999; 24:1937-1942. 6. Gallagher J, di Vadi PP, Wedley JR, et al. Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain: A prospective controlled double-blind study to assess its efficacy. Pain Clinic 1994; 7:193-198. Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.