Re: Britain bans doctor who linked autism to vaccine

[Guest guest]

I certainly do not want to instigate any more controversy on this list, however

I hope all of you who are interested in this saga re: Dr. Wakefield which has

been going on for over a decade will be openminded enough to familiarize

yourselves with the *whole* story...both sides. The TACA website and The Age of

Autism websites are sources you can check for for the pro-Wakefield viewpoint.

Please pay particular attention to those who are most involved in denigrating

this man and to their financial involvements with the vaccine industry. I'm not

arguing pro or con here....just hoping you will investigate thoroughly.

The vaccine issue aside I, along with many other moms, will forever be indebted

to Dr. Wakefield's stance on insisting on investigating a GI connection to

Autism.

Sherry

[Guest guest]

Sherry - as usual you bring the 'nut' of an issue to the forefront,. This

man has given a lot to his theory and his science. Whether a person agrees

or disagrees, he certainly used the conservative medical approach as a

scientific person to reach his conclusion.

Friend in the UK are protesting this action as we speak.

>

>

> I certainly do not want to instigate any more controversy on this list,

> however I hope all of you who are interested in this saga re: Dr. Wakefield

> which has been going on for over a decade will be openminded enough to

> familiarize yourselves with the *whole* story...both sides. The TACA website

> and The Age of Autism websites are sources you can check for for the

> pro-Wakefield viewpoint.

>

> Please pay particular attention to those who are most involved in

> denigrating this man and to their financial involvements with the vaccine

> industry. I'm not arguing pro or con here....just hoping you will

> investigate thoroughly.

>

> The vaccine issue aside I, along with many other moms, will forever be

> indebted to Dr. Wakefield's stance on insisting on investigating a GI

> connection to Autism.

> Sherry

>

>

[Guest guest]

When we took Isaac back to the doctor because he did not get the right

amount of antibiotics the first time (grrr) the doctor was chatting with me

while we waited for his strep test. She said she doesn't believe in some of

the vaccinations. She didn't say all and she didn't elaborate. I didn't

twenty question her, I just thought it was interesting. Again, not be to

controversial but to be open as a parent to fully understanding what is best

for my children.

Lori

_____

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf

Of gldcst

Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:08 PM

To:

Subject: Re: Britain bans doctor who linked autism to vaccine

I certainly do not want to instigate any more controversy on this list,

however I hope all of you who are interested in this saga re: Dr. Wakefield

which has been going on for over a decade will be openminded enough to

familiarize yourselves with the *whole* story...both sides. The TACA website

and The Age of Autism websites are sources you can check for for the

pro-Wakefield viewpoint.

Please pay particular attention to those who are most involved in

denigrating this man and to their financial involvements with the vaccine

industry. I'm not arguing pro or con here....just hoping you will

investigate thoroughly.

The vaccine issue aside I, along with many other moms, will forever be

indebted to Dr. Wakefield's stance on insisting on investigating a GI

connection to Autism.

Sherry

[Guest guest]

Hi Sara,

he also has a book coming out tomorrow I believe which can be ordered from

Amazon and which details the entire journey thus far...from his perspective.

Sherry

Sherry - as usual you bring the 'nut' of an issue to the forefront,. This

man has given a lot to his theory and his science. Whether a person agrees

or disagrees, he certainly used the conservative medical approach as a

scientific person to reach his conclusion.

Friend in the UK are protesting this action as we speak.

[Guest guest]

It's definitely a personal choice. But this man made a world

go into a panic over getting their children vaccinated. He conducted

his research in a back handed fashion and shouldn't be allowed

to practice medicine. Regardless of feelings towards vaccinations,

just looking at how he bribed children at his son's birthday party to

get them to give him blood samples is enough to anger me.

> When we took Isaac back to the doctor because he did not get the right

> amount of antibiotics the first time (grrr) the doctor was chatting

> with me

> while we waited for his strep test. She said she doesn't believe in

> some of

> the vaccinations. She didn't say all and she didn't elaborate. I

> didn't

> twenty question her, I just thought it was interesting. Again, not

> be to

> controversial but to be open as a parent to fully understanding what

> is best

> for my children.

>

> Lori

>

> _____

>

> From: [mailto: ]

> On Behalf

> Of gldcst

> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:08 PM

> To:

> Subject: Re: Britain bans doctor who linked autism to

> vaccine

>

> I certainly do not want to instigate any more controversy on this

> list,

> however I hope all of you who are interested in this saga re: Dr.

> Wakefield

> which has been going on for over a decade will be openminded enough to

> familiarize yourselves with the *whole* story...both sides. The TACA

> website

> and The Age of Autism websites are sources you can check for for the

> pro-Wakefield viewpoint.

>

> Please pay particular attention to those who are most involved in

> denigrating this man and to their financial involvements with the

> vaccine

> industry. I'm not arguing pro or con here....just hoping you will

> investigate thoroughly.

>

> The vaccine issue aside I, along with many other moms, will forever be

> indebted to Dr. Wakefield's stance on insisting on investigating a GI

> connection to Autism.

> Sherry

>

>

[Guest guest]

>>>It's definitely a personal choice. But this man made a world

go into a panic over getting their children vaccinated. He conducted

his research in a back handed fashion and shouldn't be allowed

to practice medicine. Regardless of feelings towards vaccinations,

just looking at how he bribed children at his son's birthday party to

get them to give him blood samples is enough to anger me.<<<<

after following this for many years it's become apparent to me that

*this man* did not make a world go into a panic. He never said kids should not

be vaccinated. He's advocated changing the schedule of vaccines. He has his own

version, as do others of the infamous birthday party scenario. So much of this

is just gross exaggeration by the opposition. It really is something that needs

to be studied from both sides before encouraging more inflammatory discussion.

It all depends on where and by whom you read these accounts.

I don't think he's as wonderful as many of his supporters think he is, nor do I

think he's the demonic quack his detractors do.

Sherry

again and always....just MY opinion

[Guest guest]

It's true, we'll never know how it really all happened as we weren't there.

And you're right, I do agree people need to look at the whole picture.

Being a new mum, just the idea of of using children in such a way gets my

blood boiling, and it definitely is important to look at all sides of a

picture.

xx

Jen

>

>

> >>>It's definitely a personal choice. But this man made a world

> go into a panic over getting their children vaccinated. He conducted

> his research in a back handed fashion and shouldn't be allowed

> to practice medicine. Regardless of feelings towards vaccinations,

> just looking at how he bribed children at his son's birthday party to

> get them to give him blood samples is enough to anger me.<<<<

>

> after following this for many years it's become apparent to me

> that *this man* did not make a world go into a panic. He never said kids

> should not be vaccinated. He's advocated changing the schedule of vaccines.

> He has his own version, as do others of the infamous birthday party

> scenario. So much of this is just gross exaggeration by the opposition. It

> really is something that needs to be studied from both sides before

> encouraging more inflammatory discussion. It all depends on where and by

> whom you read these accounts.

> I don't think he's as wonderful as many of his supporters think he is, nor

> do I think he's the demonic quack his detractors do.

> Sherry

> again and always....just MY opinion

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I am not into his radical to me thinking. I am much more middle of the

road. I believe that vaccines given in group cause overload of a person's

immune system anad this leads to the possibility of autoimmune problem later

on. Fuither, I am not sure that Pertussis should be given to people with

brain injuries - much more of this is made in Europe than here, but Elie has

never todate had Pertusis and he got most of his other immunizations

singelly. But he has gotten all the rest that are recommended. My

daughter- who works with ASD kids almost exclusively doesn't agree with me.

But then when do daughters ever agree with mothers.

>

>

> Hi Sara,

> he also has a book coming out tomorrow I believe which can be ordered from

> Amazon and which details the entire journey thus far...from his perspective.

> Sherry

>

>

> Sherry - as usual you bring the 'nut' of an issue to the forefront,. This

> man has given a lot to his theory and his science. Whether a person agrees

> or disagrees, he certainly used the conservative medical approach as a

> scientific person to reach his conclusion.

>

> Friend in the UK are protesting this action as we speak.

>

>