Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Raw Food

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nick,

This is why it's so difficult to determine what's what about the benefits of raw

food. My former partner would get so pissed off when I questioned the validity

of some of her claims for the benefits of raw food. Intuitively one knows some

foods are likely better raw, but which ones? And how does one determine that

data empirically? Where's the research?

Thanks for taking the time to really read the article.

What is food to one, is to others bitter poison. - Lucretius

W.G.

Ubermensch  Sports Consultancy

San Diego CA

Subject: Re: Raw Food

To: Supertraining

Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 11:12 AM

Stored bio photons? this is a quantum of absurdity. I can't " see "

this

having much basis in the real world.

The energy from the photon is used to drive reactions the energy, at which

point the photon is no more, it was a wave that also exhibits particulate

expressions. The energy is stored in carbohydrates formed in plants its

called photosynthesis, mmmm not really that new a concept?

Luminescence is not the storage of light, it is the storage of energy in

chemical reactions that stimulate atoms sufficiently that when the electrons

return to there standard orbitals the photons are released, excuse my

abbreviate version of this its many years ago that I did quantum physics.

We all vibrate and the bio photons make us vibrate faster - is this called

heat us up, let me think standing in the sun warms us up how very strange a

thought.

I really cringed my way through this article coach.

=================================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

I'm in agreement with you based on my training in nutrition and reading as an

athlete and coach over time.  Justifications of dietary fads usually haven't

got much to stand on, and the " raw food " movement is a bit weird at best and

hard to digest at best (pun somewhat intentional here).

I'd also like Dr. Ralph's feedback on this one - as his specialty is the

digestion and I think he could give us a complete insight on this one.

The Phantom

aka Schaefer, LMT/CMT, competing powerlifter

Denver, Colorado, USA

===================================

Re: Raw Food

> The primary reason for making sure you get plenty of raw food in

> your diet is due to what’s called ‘biophotons.’ It’s a term you may  

> not

> have heard of before, but in Europe, Germany in particular, there’s a

> lot of research in this area. Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt has also  

> discussed it in some detail in one of his expert interviews for my  

> Inner Circle program.

I apologize if this hurts anyone's feelings, but this biophoton  

business is nonsense. Raw food usually does have more vitamins and  

minerals and fewer carcinogens than cooked food, but biophotons have  

nothing to do with it. Cooking denatures organic compounds so there  

are less of many of the vital ones after cooking and produces some  

carcinogenic compounds if heating is excessive.

Fair winds and happy bytes,

Dave Flory,

Flower Mound, TX, U.S.A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

One thing for sure though and that is that raw food contains: 

- more enzymes

- more vitamins

- more minerals

- less carcinogenic substances

- is harder to digest

Ed White

Sandwich, MA USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Subject: Re: Re: Raw Food

To: Supertraining

Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 8:28 AM

<<<One thing for sure though and that is that raw food

contains: 

- more enzymes

- more vitamins

- more minerals

- less carcinogenic substances

- is harder to digest>>>

****

I find the above statements to be a little too broad and all encompassing.  Has

anyone actually done a study comparing the amount of the enzymes, minerals,

vitamins in for instance steamed carrots vs raw carrots.  What if I throw the

carrots in a soup and cook them?  What kind of carcinogens are introduced by

making a soup with carrots and other vegetables.

What happens to the minerals, such as  ca, fe, cu, zn etc when the food is put

into a soup.  Based on my knowledge of chemistry minerals are not changed or

destroyed by heating.

Does heat destroy Vit B, Folate etc. We know that stomach acid does not destroy

these vitamins. 

No distinction seems to be made with the type of cooking.  Certainly burning

food on the grill seems to add carcinogens to food but does heat which is lower

the burning point of food  have the same effect? 

We know from chemistry that some enzymes work best in the presence of heat. 

Enzymes are proteins and as such cannot be absorbed into the blood stream but

are broken down in the digestive process. Does it matter whether they are broken

down by the process of cooking or by the acid and digestive enzymes.

Ralph Giarnella MD

Southington Ct USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...