Guest guest Posted November 5, 2001 Report Share Posted November 5, 2001 Virginia NOW The facts on breast implants are chilling. This is particularly so when considering the medical profession's attitudes about corrective actions and opposition to removal of breast implants. First, all breast implants use silicone which can be damaging to the woman. One of the things that happens with an implant in some women is capsular contracture, which is the formation of scar tissue around the implant. This scar tissue can contract, deforming the breast and causing hardness, painful swelling, and rupture. Ruptures can also occur due to other reasons and are the main cause of problems with implants. Breast implants have an extremely high rupture rate and, therefore, are defective. Manufacturers told women that implants would last a lifetime and that ruptures occurred less than one percent of the time. But recent studies, published in the American Journal of Radiology and the ls of Plastic Surgery, reveal a rupture rate of 5 to 51 percent. A third study, published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ties rupture to the age of the implant. Of implants aged one to nine years, 36 percent had ruptured. Of those aged 10 to 17 years, 96 percent had ruptured. The FDA Commissioner, Dr. Kessler, has stated that " even with a conservative rupture rate of 5 percent, some 75,000, of the estimated 1 to 2 million women with implants, would be at risk for potentially serious adverse health effects. That is not a safety standard that the FDA can accept. " Dr. Kessler states that studies have shown that silicone is a potent stimulant to the immune system and could generate antibodies that attack collagen, a component of connective tissue. In 1992, the FDA received more that 23,000 reports of problems with implants, including complaints of " bleeding " implants, connective tissue disorders that could produce arthritis-like pain and swelling in the joints, fibrous tissue spreading around the implants and swelling of skin and limbs. When silicone leaks from a breast implant into the body, there is a cellular immune reaction which has the symptoms of an inflammation. Because silicone cannot be metabolized, the immune systems keeps trying to rid the body of the silicone. The body then begins attacking its own cell tissue and organs resulting in autoimmune disease. Traditional autoimmune, or connective tissue disorder diseases, include rheumatoid arthritis (the deforming type) and lupus. But women with implants that rupture or leak suffer from a specific group of problems including joint pain, skin rashes, numbness and fatigue. These symptoms have not been grouped together before. This fact has led to misinformation. Most studies did not look for atypical symptoms but traditional diseases. All major studies are flawed in some way with respect to this issue. Saline Alternative Although silicone implants are still available for reconstruction after mastectomy, another alternative is the Saline implant. The procedure varies according to the particular circumstances. In augmentation patients, under general anesthesia an incision is made under the breast, a pocket is formed and the deflated saline implant is inserted. A valve in the implant is used to fill the device with saltwater until the desired fullness is reached. In reconstructive patients, a temporary balloon-like tissue expander is inserted; at office visits over 8 to 10 weeks, the balloon is gradually filled with saltwater to stretch the tight post-mastectomy skin. In a separate surgery under general anesthesia, an implant replaces the expander. Some new types can be filled directly to avoid the second surgery. Mentor H/S and McGhan Medical have an implant with a rough surface marketed to inhibit scar tissue around the implant. Risks of Saline Implants Include: Saline implant envelops are made of 30% fumed silica, a known carcinogen. The result of an ongoing evaluation will be available in 1998. Repeat surgery-Dr. Kessler has recommended that implants be replaced every 8 years. Rupture and deflation requiring surgery. Capsular contracture the formation of scar tissue around the implant. This scar tissue can contract, deforming the breast and causing hardness, painful swelling, and rupture. Hiding of breast cancer signals - implants are radio opaque. Autoimmune disease, as discussed above, because the saline implants are made of 30% fumed silica. Contamination of breast milk. Changes in nipple/breast sensation. Fungal or bacterial infections - saline does not remain sterile in the body, e.g., the envelop is semi-porous. Wrinkling and related problems. The Non-Silicone Alternative Another alternative type of breast implant is that of tissue transfer from another part of the body, usually from the lower abdomen or buttocks. This type of implant, called flap surgery, carries none of the dangers of Silicone or Saline implants, but has new risks. For example, tissue that is transplanted may not re-establish blood flow and may " die, " causing severe scarring and infection. Difficulty Obtaining Implant Removal Doctors do not want to remove silicone implants. One would think doctors would be anxious to remove implants, especially after all of the problems that have been documented. Insurance companies should also have an interest in having implants removed from any woman covered. But we hear nothing from them. On the contrary, this surgery is often denied by Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) and Virginia Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Insurance companies should be required by law, if necessary, to pay for removal of implants. The only way to protect your health is to avoid both silicone and saline implants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.