ASPARTAME

[Guest guest]

ASPARTAME

1972 a first paper by Dr COOK

PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES SC 18862 (now known among many names as

ASPARTAME)

The EFSA has a NEAR complete set of

copies of research done on this sweetener and publicly available.

ASPARTAME has never been found to be

safe and certainly in this first report showed ALARMING potential to

cause harm to humans. It has in the 40 years since infiltrated

itself into the worlds food supplies and has caused massive amounts

of disease and illness such that it could arguably be called the

worst health era in the history of mankind.

Like that other KILLER with its

withdrawal from the world markets in 2000 (DIAZINON) we might say in

five years or so that ASPARTAME is being withdrawn after 40 years of

SAFE use in favour of other sweeteners. That at least will keep Big

pHARMA and world governments from TOTAL and COMPLETE bankruptcy.

The research on ASPARTAME is massive

and this alone makes it an impossible task for ANY person to

understand and interpret all the research done on this chemical.

A mans life work could be put on a

computer in seconds.

The research on aspartame takes hours

to download.

A man just has not the mental capacity

to go through this research and in three months BUT I am still

looking for evidence of safety for ASPARTAME.

In the teeth of MUCH serious harm shown

by both industry, university and governent the lies about its safety

and the denial of serious reproducible data, it is PAST time that a

DESTROYER of HEALTH called ASPARTAME remains in our FOOD today.

Just looking at the first research in

the EFSA file is a 100 page paper on SC 18862 SWEETENING AGENT.

While the summary talks of nothing

particular found except normal responses to a food, the actuality is

COMPLETELY different.

Depression of blood pressure OUTSIDE of

our normal ranges is something that might evoke its use for heart

patients but is hardly foreboding to give to HEALTHY people who dont

want their heart and its beating to be MUCKED ABOUT WITH.

All blood pressure and heart rate

readings were depressed to OUT of normal range values.within the

hour.

At higher levels the blood pressure

went out of range in the REVERSE direction.

Clearly to a lay person giving the

impression of a DEREGULATION of the heart and its ability to function

normally. This is DANGEROUS for our long term health.

These effects in from 30 minutes to one

hour repeated many times a day year in and year out cannot have a

good long term effect on our hearts and might explain an accelerating

decline in quality of peoples hearts suffering from exactly this kind

of irregularity especially when stressed or working hard. Today an

accelrating number of both pacemakers and other implantations to

counter these effects as well as surgery to cut nerves and more food

additives to try to counter the bad effects of ASPARTAME. This is of

course the introduction of FOLIC ACID to counter ASPARTAME harm.

Of course when starting out with your

very first experiment to get a dangerous drug accepted by most

nations for most of its processed foods you dont explain your ACTUAL

findings in these terms I have given above.

More succinctly you want a pay packet

next week and not a life looking for your next job. In addition you

now become one of the boys and your secret has bankable returns in

the long term.

So this is what a DEREGULATION of your

heart every time you eat this additive is paraphrased down to in the

COOK report:

Oral administratiopn of SC 18862

(ASPARTAME) did NOT significantly alter the blood pressure or heart

rate.

Weasel words like not significant

should send a shiver down the spine of any regulator but apparently

it just meant dont look closer perhaps?

A complete deregulation of both our

heart beat and our blood pressure from ASPARTAME with the actual

research showing harm and the BENIGN summary gives a small clue to

the real problem right from the very first in 1972 June when Dr Cook,

cooks his summary for the USA FDA.

There appears nothing wrong with the

research but everything wrong in INTERPRETATION of this report with partiality. Omission of results is another feature of concern as we

have seen this in other research papers on ASPARTAME where death

itself becomes a HEALTH BENEFIT.

Nor is this the only concern here.

Signs of neurological HARM is

abundandantly clear.at rates TEN times LESS than permitted in the USA

for this food additive in 2012. How can this be ALLOWED?

It is quite clear that far from being a

food stuff this is a DRUG and one that has various medium effects on

a WIDE RANGE of our human biochemistry with PREDICTABLE ADVERSE

CONSEQUENCES from its long term use.

You cannot find all these changes from

both high and low doses and not expect HARM to the human body in the

long term.

And finally all these ADVERSE changes

came in an experiment with a duration of less than ONE WEEK and

biochemical ADVERSE effects within half an hour of exposure.

Magnify this to repeated dosages and

build up over a ten years period as we know it does build up contrary

to industry denial and the health of today infants, adults and one in

seven death rate for the child in the womb becomes INEVITABLE.

1972 a first paper by Dr COOK

PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES SC 18862 (now known among many names as

ASPARTAME)

ASPARTAME