ASPARTAME EFSA E2 research paper on SC 18862

[Guest guest]

E2

Dr Rao et al

ASPARTAME 1974 August report:

Dr Rao et al fed animals for 4 weeks

with SC 18862 (ASPARTAME)

This report or research if you can call

it by this grandiose title was to feed animals for a VERY short

period of time with large amounts of aspartame and observe they didnt

DIE! Just to be sure, they killed them at the end of this short

period before they could perhaps DIE later from their HUGE TOXIC

INSULT.

The comment they didnt die, seems

rather odd when you give a food additive for such a short period of

time. I mean you wouldnt be happy if you thought you had every chance

of death or illness even if after a long time just to help some

company make money and the FDA to get WELL paid jobs there later or

often very much sooner in their careers.

Also we know of one error that they

made which resulted in this comment:

The interpretation of the data does not

change because of an uncomfortable but consistent error in writing up

the first report.

They literally put the decimal point in

the wrong place.

What is surprisng about this report is

that everything seems so vague as to be laid back to the point of

blindness.

Almost nothing was observed amiss and

what was amiss didnt seem to evoke any interest.

First the test animals ATE more than 30

per cent more than ANTICIPATED.

In view of the current 2012 obesity

problems for a few people this rang rather loud bells for me.

What would be the effect of over eating

consistently for long periods of time when you have aspartame in your

diet?

Another feature of considerable worry

was the report of a HEAVY CLEAR MODERATELY VISCOUS FLUID which

commenced in the stomach and continued further into the lower

regions.

We will have to guess what this was and

its significance.

The tests just show that giving ADULTS

ASPARTAME for an extremely SHORT TIME wont kill them but may leave

their stomachs in a bit of a mess.

What happens if this drug is given to

babies or given to anyone for more than an extremely short time in

their lives is UNCLEAR.

It reminds me of the THIMEROSAL given

to a group of people who coped with it unremarkably for a week after.

So the report went.

A month later they were all dead but

nobody thought this important enough to comment on let alone publish.

I mean they already had published the safety of THIMEROSAL was PROVEN

and the RISK BENEFIT was CLEAR already to the company.

It DOESNT do to report deaths when you

are trying to get a food additive on the market but this report even

with what it ADMITTED happened gives cause to consider it a TOXIC

compound.

Again you want a job next week and the

week after and you are working for a company that stands to make more

than a BILLION dollars annually if you can prove BLACK is WHITE.

This is reckoned by EFSA to be the

second test done on EC 18862 but is more than two years after the

Cook Report.

Also, approval had ALREADY been granted

for this food additive in the USA.

Hardly any of the most tested in the

history of foods appears true unless the EFSA arrangement of papers

is not chronological.

July

26, 1974 -The

FDA grants aspartame its first approval for restricted use in dry

foods.

EFSA

must have an odd system for their complete set of documents as we

know:

February

1973 -After

spending tens of millions of dollars conducting safety tests, the

G.D. Searle Company applies for FDA approval and submits over 100

studies they claim support aspartame's safety.

No

sign of tens of millions on RESEARCH so where did the tens of

millions GO?

Even allowing the FDA a prior look at

this paper we seem to have a CREDIBILITY gap of 98 missing papers in

the EFSA files.

UNLESS they have a bizarre system of

numbering and arrangement.

And before even the E1 paper we see the

strategy for ASPARTAME approval

December

18, 1970 -Searle

Company executives lay out a "food and Drug Sweetener Strategy'

that they feel will put the FDA into a positive frame of mind about

aspartame. An internal policy memo describes psychological tactics

the company should use to bring the FDA into a subconscious spirit of

participation" with them on aspartame and get FDA regulators

into the "habit of saying, "Yes"."

And

we know that in 1967 came experiments where 5 out of 7 animals

suffered SERIOUS neurological effects from ASPARTAME. Not mentioned

or known of at the time except to a restricted PRIVATE CARTEL.

5 out

of 7 potential LIFE THREATENING reactions and the company pushed

ahead to collect their BILLION dollar annually BLOOD MONEY.

Such

is the background to ONE food additive product.

Imagine

the THOUSANDS of CHEMICAL additives that get passed by the DOZEN

after REGULATORS spend a whole morning going through the relevent

papers prepared by the company submitting them for APPROVAL.

The

FDA and Big pHARMA working to ensure the RISK - BENEFIT is OK.

We

take the RISK.

They

get the BENEFIT.

ASPARTAME 1974 August report:

Dr Rao et al

E2