Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 And then there is the matter of coercian. There is a long history of coercian and abuse in psychiatry going all the way back to forced lobotomies, electroshocks, insulin-induced comas etc. etc. Modern psychiatry relies more on drugs, obviously, but it's fundamental modus operandi hasn't changed. Check out " The Lobotomist " by Jack El-Hai (about Walter Freeman, MD, who performed thousands of ice- pick lobotomies on patients in their own homes who had minor problems like mild depression or social anxiety); or " The Myth of Mental Illness " by Szasz (about the history of coercian in psychiatry). For example, did you know that homosexuality was still classified as a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association as recently as the 1970s? Szasz helped change that. Vornan -- In SSRIsex , " lightsoutluther " wrote: > > > I blame myself more than drug companies and doctors. Sure, they > deserve some blame, but I'm responsible for my own actions. I'm just > unneccessarily paying for a mistake I made 6 years ago. My #1 goal > is to get better, getting " revenge " on those I feel are responsible > won't move me any closer to recovery. The best revenge is to get > better and live a good life. As the saying goes. > > Luther > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > their life > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally > to > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > these > > > castrating drugs. > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > cruel to blame your fellow > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do help > people and save lives. > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > effects have proved > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > machine and choosing a > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > decide. I do know that no > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the case > with just about all large > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > concern--short-term > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > process, just so long as it > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > watched The Constant > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > lurking in the shadows off and > > on for quite a while. > > > > River > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 whooops, make that " coercion " :-) > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > > their life > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > equally > > to > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > > these > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > help > > people and save lives. > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > > effects have proved > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > > machine and choosing a > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > > decide. I do know that no > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > case > > with just about all large > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > concern--short-term > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > process, just so long as it > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > > watched The Constant > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > River > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 I blame myself because I should have researched SSRIs before taking them. Even back in 2001, there was ample data available on the internet that would have raised concerns. Heck, there's stuff going as far back as the early 90s. True, I was deceived by drug companies who hide the real dangers of these drugs. My doctor was decieved as well, and possibly just ignorant. He feels terrible for what happened to me. I put too much trust in the modern medical system. The most important thing for me is to just keep improving. Keep in mind my full emotional range hasn't come back. I mainly have suppressed anger. It's apparent to me that many folks on this board don't have this problem. Luther > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > > their life > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > equally > > to > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > > these > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > help > > people and save lives. > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > > effects have proved > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > > machine and choosing a > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > > decide. I do know that no > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > case > > with just about all large > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > concern--short-term > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > process, just so long as it > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > > watched The Constant > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > River > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Psychiatry is a mess, and has been since the beginning. One just has to look at all the terrible cases over at the Dr. Bob board. I'll bet many of those patients went to the doctor with mild depression, then were put on a roller coaster ride of meds which made their cases worse, which led their doctor to believe their depression got worse, so more drugs with higher doses are prescribed. The drugs are never blamed! That's a big part of the problem. Luther > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > > their life > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > equally > > to > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > > these > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > help > > people and save lives. > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > > effects have proved > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > > machine and choosing a > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > > decide. I do know that no > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > case > > with just about all large > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > concern--short-term > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > process, just so long as it > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > > watched The Constant > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > River > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Feel free to blame yourself, it's your choice. But I don't agree with you at all. I fully researched SSRIs before I took celexa in 2001. I read medical journals and it turned out that the information was completely false. And there was not a single report of PSSD in PubMed. All of the doctors that had patients who complained about PSSD and did nothing are guilty of breaking the hippocratic oath. And the drug companies who suppressed data about increased suicide risks, homicidal behavior, persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns and other birth defects, and so on, have blood on their hands. Vornan > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > > > their life > > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > > equally > > > to > > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give > out > > > these > > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > > help > > > people and save lives. > > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary > side > > > effects have proved > > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > > > machine and choosing a > > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > > > decide. I do know that no > > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > > case > > > with just about all large > > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > > concern--short-term > > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > > process, just so long as it > > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > > > watched The Constant > > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > > > River > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Will you still blame yourself if you never recover? Because there is a possibility that we might not. We just don't have the technology right now to figure out exactly what has happened to our brains. It would take a team of labs working round the clock for a decade to even figure out what has happened, let alone find a cure. Everything we have done so far is trial-and-error. The other iatrogenic psychiatric disaster, tardive dyskinesia, has been recognized by the mainstream for many years, but there is no cure. Vornan > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > > > their life > > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > > equally > > > to > > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give > out > > > these > > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > > help > > > people and save lives. > > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary > side > > > effects have proved > > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > > > machine and choosing a > > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > > > decide. I do know that no > > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > > case > > > with just about all large > > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > > concern--short-term > > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > > process, just so long as it > > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > > > watched The Constant > > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > > > River > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 True, you're not going to find any mention of PSSD in medical journals, etc. But there are plenty of first hand accounts of SSRIs if you you search Google groups or other support groups, which date back several years. There are websites devoted to the dangers of SSRIs that have been around for years. Had I done this, it may have been enough for me to have second thoughts about taking Celexa. I agree 100% with your last paragraph. Ultimately, we shouldn't have to do research before undergoing a medical treatment. Doctors and drug companies should be well informed and know and communicate every possibility to their patients. Sadly, this is not the case in such a money-driven field. Luther > > > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or > saved > > > > their life > > > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > > > equally > > > > to > > > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give > > out > > > > these > > > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless > and > > > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > > > help > > > > people and save lives. > > > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary > > side > > > > effects have proved > > > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a > time > > > > machine and choosing a > > > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what > I'd > > > > decide. I do know that no > > > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > > > case > > > > with just about all large > > > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > > > concern--short-term > > > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > > > process, just so long as it > > > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, > I > > > > watched The Constant > > > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > > > > > River > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 I don't think there is any way I can recover with what's out there now in terms of medical treatment. It's too complex a problem for there to be a " magic bullet " . I know many people here seem to think that certain drugs will reverse the effects (ie " anti-serotonin " drugs). I suppose it's worth a shot, considering I've had many brief drug trials as well. But I wouldn't get my hopes up. I'm resigned to the fact that I may not " fully " recover, but I know I can get to a certain point using alternative therapies, which have already helped somewhat though not sexually. I will not wait for science to catch up to this problem... Luther > > > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or > saved > > > > their life > > > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > > > equally > > > > to > > > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give > > out > > > > these > > > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless > and > > > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do > > > help > > > > people and save lives. > > > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary > > side > > > > effects have proved > > > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a > time > > > > machine and choosing a > > > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what > I'd > > > > decide. I do know that no > > > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the > > > case > > > > with just about all large > > > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > > > > concern--short-term > > > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > > > > process, just so long as it > > > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, > I > > > > watched The Constant > > > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > > > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > > > > > River > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 There are very few first-hand accounts prior to 2001. And there would be no reason to look for them. -- In SSRIsex , " lightsoutluther " wrote: > > > True, you're not going to find any mention of PSSD in medical > journals, etc. But there are plenty of first hand accounts of SSRIs > if you you search Google groups or other support groups, which date > back several years. There are websites devoted to the dangers of > SSRIs that have been around for years. Had I done this, it may have > been enough for me to have second thoughts about taking Celexa. > > I agree 100% with your last paragraph. Ultimately, we shouldn't have > to do research before undergoing a medical treatment. Doctors and > drug companies should be well informed and know and communicate > every possibility to their patients. Sadly, this is not the case in > such a money-driven field. > > > Luther > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or > > saved > > > > > their life > > > > > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their > > > > equally > > > > > to > > > > > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who > give > > > out > > > > > these > > > > > > > castrating drugs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless > > and > > > > > cruel to blame your fellow > > > > > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants > do > > > > help > > > > > people and save lives. > > > > > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary > > > side > > > > > effects have proved > > > > > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a > > time > > > > > machine and choosing a > > > > > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what > > I'd > > > > > decide. I do know that no > > > > > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > > > > > > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is > the > > > > case > > > > > with just about all large > > > > > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only > one > > > > > concern--short-term > > > > > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in > the > > > > > process, just so long as it > > > > > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny > coincidence, > > I > > > > > watched The Constant > > > > > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > > > > > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > > > > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've > been > > > > > lurking in the shadows off and > > > > > > on for quite a while. > > > > > > > > > > > > River > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 > I blame myself because I should have researched SSRIs before taking > them. Even back in 2001, there was ample data available on the > internet that would have raised concerns. Heck, there's stuff going > as far back as the early 90s. True, I was deceived by drug companies > who hide the real dangers of these drugs. That seems to me to be the real crux of the matter, though. This type of thing happens again and again: given the choice of coming clean with the full results of clinical trials or selling a new drug to a larger population, drug companies frequently choose the latter. (I would say " usually " or even " invariably " instead of " frequently, " but I don't know the statistics; probably no one does.) In 1998, I switched from Wellbutrin, which had been prescribed by my primary-care doctor and wasn't helping, to Zoloft after biting the bullet and deciding to see a psychiatrist. Ironically enough, I checked out Wellbutrin rather thoroughly before starting on it; I checked the PDR and several other books. When I made the switch, I was less thorough in my research because I was so relieved to find a new doctor I liked and trusted. To that extent, I guess I was culpable in my own fate, but I really don't blame myself. It damn well is the responsibility of drug manufacturers to provide full information to prescribing physicians, and in turn it is the physicians' responsibility to disclose to their patients all the possibilities, including potential negative outcomes such as long-term sexual dysfunction. Even those of us who may be astute and motivated enough to want control over our own treatment are sometimes too ill to take charge, let alone give informed consent, so it's incumbent upon the professionals who are being well paid for their services to look out for us. That, after all, is a large part of why they went to medical school and completed residencies. They're supposed to know more than us. If the drug companies are deceiving them and causing them to harm their patients, then it seems to me they have a pretty big complaint, too. Speaking solely for myself, I cannot imagine myself in the throes of deep depression and being able to sift through data or decide which among various sources saying different things I should trust. At times like that, I may read a single sentence three times and still be unsure of the meaning. Critical thinking? I wish! River Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 Another thing is all these people that say antidepressents helped them...most of them have pssd, but they feel getting over the depression is worth the penis loss. Now do they really believe that? I doubt it. Their just brain washed by the pyschatrists. Taking antideprresents is no different than taking a drug like fosomax which is an osteorporosis drug that caused jaw bone decay(permanent excrutiating pain) in 1000s of people. Expect we get permanent sexual dysfunction forever making our lives meaningless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 it helped me cos i tried to suicide and now i'm not having suicidal toughts anymore... > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved their life > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally to > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out these > castrating drugs. I just feel like punching them. I still hate the > pychatrist the worst though. Their making 100 of thousands of dollars > by castrating people by drugs. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.