Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Le Roy girls suffering from new vaccines and nerve chemical attack?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Le Roy girls

Are they suffering from a new vaccine

yet to be perfected?

Regard the initial work on the flu

vaccine.

The flu vaccine

When was the flu vaccine developed?

An excellent timeline for vaccines is

here:

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/all

It appears that the flu vaccine is so

well hidden there is no mention of its use in 1918/1919.

No mention of its re-development in

1945.

Nor mention of the use of it in 2009.

There is a mention for 1976 and the

link to Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) but immediately links its

cause to bacteria.

Also in 1957 there is mention to a flu

vaccine and its production in four months. Two million died from this

illness. In the USA 70 000 died. So how do they maintain the figures

for death in present day flu vaccine campaigns?

The history seems to puzzle even those

who follow the history of this means of health care.

Todays methods are clearly explained in

simple pictures here:

http://www.aimtoolkit.org/influenza/Edu_Annual_flu_Vax_Production_Timeline.pdf

Wiki provides lots of information

On INFLUENZA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza

The

most famous and lethal outbreak was the 1918

flu pandemic (Spanish

flu pandemic) (type

A influenza, H1N1 subtype),

which lasted from 1918 to 1919. It is not known exactly how many it

killed, but estimates range from 20 to 100 million

people.[162][163] This

pandemic has been described as "the greatest medical holocaust

in history" and may have killed as many people as the Black

Death.[159] This

huge death toll was caused by an extremely high infection rate of up

to 50% and the extreme severity of the symptoms, suspected to be

caused by cytokine

storms.[163] Indeed,

symptoms in 1918 were so unusual that initially influenza was

misdiagnosed as dengue, cholera,

or typhoid. One observer wrote, "One of the most striking of the

complications was hemorrhage frommucous

membranes,

especially from the nose, stomach, and intestine. Bleeding from the

ears and petechial

hemorrhages in

the skin also occurred."[162] The

majority of deaths were from bacterial

pneumonia,

a secondary

infection caused

by influenza, but the virus also killed people directly, causing

massive hemorrhages and edema in

the lung.[164]

The

1918 flu pandemic (Spanish flu pandemic) was truly global, spreading

even to the Arctic and

remote Pacific

islands.

The unusually severe disease killed between 2 and 20% of those

infected, as opposed to the more usual flu epidemic mortality

rate of

0.1%.[155][162] Another

unusual feature of this pandemic was that it mostly killed young

adults, with 99% of pandemic influenza deaths occurring in people

under 65, and more than half in young adults 20 to 40 years

old.[165] This

is unusual since influenza is normally most deadly to the very young

(under age 2) and the very old (over age 70). The total mortality of

the 1918–1919 pandemic is not known, but it is estimated that 2.5%

to 5% of the world's population was killed. As many as 25 million may

have been killed in the first 25 weeks; in contrast, HIV/AIDS has

killed 25 million in its first 25 years.[162]

The

first significant step towards preventing influenza was the

development in 1944 of a killed-virus vaccine for influenza by

Francis, Jr..

This built on work by Australian

Macfarlane Burnet,

who showed that the virus lost virulence when it was cultured in

fertilized hen's eggs.[174]Application

of this observation by Francis allowed his group of researchers at

the University

of Michigan to

develop the first influenza vaccine, with support from the U.S.

Army.[175] The

Army was deeply involved in this research due to its experience of

influenza in World

War I,

when thousands of troops were killed by the virus in a matter of

months.[162]

This next again conflicts with known

timelines for vaccines.

Perhaps to avoid the obvious.

New vaccines usually involve some

COLLATERAL DAMAGE until the experts get the methods and production

sorted out.

But the first development of vaccines

for influenza et al also coincided with a rather high number of dead

people.

Something not seen before or since in

our vaccine history.

http://explorevaccines.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/a-vaccine-timeline-the-global-experiment/

1917 U.S. soldiers

are vaccinated prior to going overseas to fight in WW I. They soon

begin to drop dead by the thousands from a strange syndrome that

preferentially attacks young adults.

1918 “The

Pandemic of Influenza in 1918-1919â€

prepared by the US Department of Health, Education and Welfare Public

Health Service National Office of Vital Statistics indicates that the

extraordinary feature of “the Great

Spanish flu†was that it attacked young people in the prime of life

unlike any other epidemics recorded: “The

pandemic of influenza in 1918-19 which swept over nearly every

continent and island of the whole globe has been described as one of

the great human catastrophies. There are excellent descriptions of

epidemics and pandemics as far back as the year 1500, and various

records of epidemics since the 1918-19 holocaust. Many of them

were relatively mild infections, while others were severe, but none

of them showed the extraordinary high mortality in young adults that

characterized the 1918-19 pandemic and its aftermath in 1920. The

greatest amount of mortality in epidemics prior to and subsequent to

1918-19 was found in children under 1 year of age and in persons 65

years and over.â€

“Frost,

in one of his reports, pointed out that influenza and pneumonia

mortality rose sharply in some cities in the United States in

December 1915 and January 1916, which may or may not have been

related to the 1918 epidemic. In January 1916, influenza was s

reported to be epidemic in 22 States, but it was described as a mild

type of illness.â€

The

1918-19 epidemic

was often referred to in the United States as “Spanish influenza,â€

but there is no reason to believe that it originated in Spain. Indeed

the occurrence of influenza in the United States in the spring of

1918 may have preceded that which occurred in Spain.†It

has been estimated that there were about 20,000,000 cases of

influenza and pneumonia in the United States in 1918-19, with

approximately 850,000 deaths. In 1918 alone, 464,959 deaths from

influenza and pneumonia were registered in the registration States

and the District of Columbia as compared with 115,526 in 1917. “It

was the impression of many

in 1918 that an unrecognized virus was the primary cause of influenza

and that the streptococci, pneumococci, and influenza bacilli were

secondary invaders which might be termed “bacterial

hitch-hikers.â€Attempts

by two groups of investigators to transmit the infection by nasal

instillation of filtered and unfiltered secretions from influenza

cases in human volunteers were not successful. Nor could they produce

influenza in the volunteers by nasal instillations with Pfeiffer

bacilli.â€

If

a vaccine containing the viruses now known to cause the disease had

been made available early in the epidemic, it is doubtful whether it

would have been effective, since the epidemic in the fall of 1918

spread with great rapidity.†Pathologists

became intimately familiar with the condition of lungs of victims of

bacterial pneumonia at autopsy. But the viral

pneumonias caused by the influenza pandemic were so violent that

many investigators said the only lungs they had seen that resembled

them were from victims of poison gas.

THE

USE OF INFLUENZA VACCINE IN THE PRESENT EPIDEMIC.

Leary.Am

J Public Health (N Y). 1918

October; 8(10): 754-755, 768.

1919 PRESENT

STATUS OF PNEUMOCOCCUS VACCINE.

L. Cecil. Am

J Public Health (N Y). 1919

August; 9(8): 589–592. ‘ …some

experiments with a pneumococcus vaccine, and, after consultation with

Dr. Rufus Cole of the Rockefeller Institute, it was decided to

prepare a

vaccine, type I, II and III pneumococcus, in approximately equal

parts, and to inoculate about 50 per cent of the camp with this

vaccine. Twelve

thousand five hundred and nineteen men were vaccinated at Camp Upton

(about 40 per cent of the camp strength)…The local and general

reactions were usually mild, but there were quite a few small,

sterile, infiltrations at the site of the injection which appeared to

be an expression of pneumococcus susceptibility. In spite of the

successful results obtained at Camp Upton, there was

certain objection

to pneumococcus vaccine which interfered somewhat with its extensive

use. In the first place, three injections were necessary in order to

obtain a satisfactory immunity,

and this for obvious reasons was burdensome to the regimental

surgeons and to the men themselves, who had already

received typhoid and smallpox vaccine. Another

objection to pneumococcus vaccine was the occurrence of small sterile

infiltrations which sometimes followed its use…this commission was

directed to proceed to Camp Wheeler, Georgia, for the purpose of

instituting voluntary vaccination among the troops. In this

experiment we decided to substitute a

pneumococcus lipovaccine for

the saline vaccine which we had used at Camp Upton. This vaccine

was prepared for us by Col. E.’ R. Whitmore of the Army Medical

School, and the dose finally adopted after some preliminary

experiments was 30 billion pneumococci (10 billion of each of the

fixed types in one cc. of oil). Pneumococcus

vaccine, however, produces at best only a moderate degree of

protection and probably affords very little cross immunity. Pneumonia

rarely occurs as an epidemic scourge like-smallpox so there would be

difficulty in having vaccination against pneumonia made

compulsory. People

do not fear the disease and are, therefore, unwilling to submit to

the inconvenience of being vaccinated. An experiment

is being carried out at the present time by the United States Public

Health Service in the insane asylums of New York State, which should

give some very interesting results.

Another TIMELINE fro vaccines is here:

http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/allergy/402-allergy_timeline.htm

A very simple TIMELINE:

Again mentions the 1945 start for the

flu vaccine and NOT the debacle around 1918 / 1919.

Or more complete:

http://www.immunize.org/timeline/

The BMJ clearly records the production

of POLYVALENT flu vaccine in 1918 by Wellcome and Co.

The USA as indicated above were mass

vaccinating all their soldiers for everything imaginable and

possible.

Add to this the million of pounds of

NERVE DESTROYING chemical agents used in North Europe and the

subsequent world wide dispersion together with mass vaccine campaigns

and we have a RECIPE for more deaths in peacetime than EVER during 4

years of WORLD WAR 1918 style.

The flu vaccine was developed and

MASSIVELY used in the 1918 – 1919 influenza outbreak and by any

logic DID NOT work.

How much damage did it do?

And why is this part of VACCINE HISTORY

clinically, surgically and totally removed from most TIMELINES of our

vaccine history?

When was the flu vaccine developed?

The flu vaccine

Perspective here

http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp058068

Are the Le Roy girls having similar

teething problems to GARDASIL a very new and troublesome vaccine with

a lot of anecdtotal evidence all is not quite right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...