WHAT IF

[Guest guest]

WHAT IF?

What if SCIENTISTS reverted to SCIENCE?

What if OBSERVATIONS were called

SCIENCE and not ANECDOTES? Harry vaccinated at 4.30 and dead in

6 hours is scientific evidence of possible VACCINE HARM.

What if ANECDOTES like: I know a man

who knows a man who knows someone who had his son DIE of SIDS and

didnt have any vaccines and was 6 months old and living in the USA.

(In the USA almost everyone is vaccinated at DAY ONE and often

families are UNAWARE of this) were called ANECDOTES and not used as

part of every nations vaccine policy. One doctor observed his patient

turn into a GREEN MONSTER is an example of a LYING doctor and far too

common when defending vaccines in this BIZARRE fashion. Trying to

destroy the POTENCY of PROPER OBSERVATION and proving that while

amibiguity over 1998 interests warrants dismissal from the medical

practice that LIES are fine especially if they cloud the issue over

vaccine danger. Just what will happen to Thorsen for example? And

what happened to the green monstrous doctor?

The evidence is overwhelming that

vaccines in some ways are HARMFUL and that the HARM is ignored:

1. Repeat vaccines (discovered in 1903)

cause ANAPHYLAXIS.

2. Thimerosal vaccines cause

(discovered in circa 1866 and again in circa 1933 and again in circa

1977 and again in circa 1997) DEATH. Safety data (circa 1933) from 22

people exposed and 22 DEAD, and scientists called it a promising

antibiotic.

3. Vaccination too young elicits no

proper immune response. EVERYONE agrees; ALLELULAH!

4. Too many vaccines at once OVERLOADS

the immune system. Just ONE person (anecdotally referred to ALREADY)

has PROOF that 10 000 at once is fine for the infant. Do we base all

our vaccine advice on this person? At the moment the answer is

(already alluded to) YES. His nameis prominent on current UK vaccine

guidelines. His word is accepted as destractors are taken to the

TOWER.

5. Vaccines do work and no one doubts

this. But TB vaccines have been halted perhaps because they dont work

and the disadvantages are too great? My own experience here is of

vaccinated people getting TB or just dropping DEAD. Based on a sample

of less than 50 though. Anecdotal only!

Vaccines are an art form more than a

science. Even the proper keeping of vaccines can be abused. Human

error is too great. Too many vaccine experts in life have regretted

their acceptance of safety on reflection and examination of data

which initself is often secret, top secret or not known. One example

in the VAERS is of a nurse who just happened to read the obituary of

a healthy man she had recently vaccinated. Getting into the public

domain by sheer luck or simply another anecdote perhaps?

In the UK compensation used to range

from 10 to 20 thousand pounds. Stuart examined over four months

one case brought against a doctor. Why did a vaccine company pay more

than 1 million pounds to protect this doctor who would have

professional insurance. The cost to him would be nothing. The judge

took an adverse event of 1 in 310 000 and proved in the four months

that the figure was no adverse events ever. The parents were liars.

An example where search and destroy tactics were used decades ago.

The child continues to be ill and with no admittance even with a no

fault scheme of compensation. UK pays defence costs for vaccine

damaged families but a lost case means that money is repaid and

interest added to the unpaid part at around 8 per cent. This family

vaccine injured now faced financial and doctor induced insults. To be

called a liar would also affect the work prospects of a person (see

Wakefield for example)

Some years later this vaccine was

replaced with a SAFER vaccine. This at least is true. How do you get

SAFER than 100 per cent SAFE? This vaccine talks of 1 child in every

thousand in a big study arriving DEAD in the short space of the

safety tests (possibly 2 months maximum?). To come up to date in 2008

a new vaccine came onto the market and guess what? One in a thousand

did not DIE. The use of CONTROLS was the method to get on the market

a vaccine used from 1991 to 2001 with thimerosal and FRAUDULENT

admittance of harm using a control. Apart from epidemiology to prove

no harm the control is the other way to cover up harm. The proper

control for a healthy person getting vaccines is that they will NOT

die in two months as shown is correct in a 2008 vaccine study and was

shown wanting in 1991. For me this is prima facie evidence of a

KILLING effect of the 1991vaccine for around one vaccinated personin

thousand for ten years. But who cares?

How can 1 in 310 000 go to zero and

then 1 in 1 000 dead when replaced by a SAFER vaccine. The reason lay

in the EPIDEMIOLOGY (research Doll the worlds GREATEST). 1 in

1 000 infants are expected to die in 2 weeks so the vaccine

regulators passed the vaccine as SAFER than 100 per cent SAFE.

So what if we accept FACTS?

What changes would we make to 1 though

4 in the current vaccine scheme?

For 1 At present we have anaphylaxis

medication handy at hospital but most cot deaths occur at night at

home. And giving vaccines at the end of a day appears a callous time

to give them as anaphylaxis kicks in during the babies sleep an hour

or so later.

For 2 At present we have a woolly

please get the mercury out while recommending mercury for other

countries. In 2011 we see every not new born to 6 months recommended

to have possibly two different mercury vaccines every year.

For 3 At present recommendations are

for ever earlier vaccines. 2011 april experience is that people are

getting measles at ages 16 and 17 years old and vaccinated against

the illness.

The current what ifs are UNACCEPTABLE.

No better represented than the FARCE

over a continuing and increasing use of neurotoxins in vaccines while

actually LYING that they have been removed and that they are NOT

neurotoxins. Fritz Lorscheider and his film showing a growing brain

cell continuing to grow in various toxins but being taken apart in a

controlled and reverse life process with mercury is DISMISSED as

FRAUD.

The reverse of LIFE is DEATH.

The reverse of BAD vaccines policies is

a SPARED life of MISERY and or DEATH to person or persons UNKNOWN.

What would be the ATTITUDE of

Government, Regulators and Industry if they accepted the WORST CASE

SCENARIOS above and constantlyand increasingly put forward by

increasing and ever knowledgable persons.

Science must be based on OBSERVATIONS.

It must Not be on the BOTTOM LINE we

WILL never STOP the relentless advance of the 4 vaccination policies

described above.

WHAT IF?

Post Script 1 Vaccines reduce the

ability to resist other illnesses or even the illness of the vaccine.

The effes?ct is standard. What is done tocheck this effect?

Post Scipt 2 Head blow ups are common

after vaccines. Accurate measurement is increasingly available but

again NEVER done.

Post Script 3 Government protection

almost means attempted murder is ALLOWED for certain members of

society? See one in thousand of every vaccinee above for example.

Post Script 4 How do top scientists get

figures of no harm often in contradiction of even the makers of

vaccines.

We are in a parallel world to that of

the nuclear industry and tobacco industry?

WHAT IF?

POST SCRIPT POST SCRIPT

from todays emails

14

years old has been unable to attend school due to fatigue

and nausea and other symptoms since last December 2010.

When I took her to her G.P. and had all the usual blood

tests done they returned as normal. I did mention to the

doctor that my daughter had had her second HPV injection at

school just before she began to feel sick, but she

dismissed any connection.

Like the lamb to slaughter the next

vaccine is IMMINENT!

THEY WOULD NEVER HARM US

Words from Mr BEFORE his wife got

DOUBLE LIFE but after 2 deaths to his first and second born

The third STILL ALIVE but not

vaccinated the SAME as the first and second born.