UNKNOWN PANDEMIC in our midst?

[Guest guest]

PANDEMIC DEATH

I was until recently unaware that

pregnancy was the cause of a PANDEMIC medical problem where death was

almost to be expected. Evidently this is the viewpoint at least of

those who not only see no problem with death immediately following

vaccination but portray it as a medical intervention of SUCCESS.

Looking at the adverse reactions from

vaccines, we first of all find nearly all adverse events (99.99 per

cent) are discarded as coincidental. The safety of vaccines therefore

comes out as almost totally safe with many doctors and nurses denying

any or all possibility of any bad effects whatsoever. This leads to

dangerous areas for families where adverse effects really do happen.

Even where harm is caused by vaccines there is nothing to be done.

All this denial causes most sensible people to take care about how,

when and how many vaccines they give their child. A simple idea might

be to restrict vaccines for their children to no more than the adults

in the family take. Certainly doctors or nurses should take regular

vaccines to show their acceptance of NO HARM. The minister for health

in France being the first to get the H1N1 vaccines without any

subsequent adverse effects.

Studies of vaccines with no vaccines

should be the gold standard to vaccine studies where the placebo is

often more dangerous than the true vaccine. Vaccines are carefully

developed, normally over long periods of time, even decades. The AIDS

vaccine predicted to be in use by now is still WANTING after 30

years. Placebos on the other hand, contain all the ingredients except

the virus or bacterial fragments and are concocted ad hoc by the

researchers. Their administration of a useless medical intervention

that can do no good is for me unethical and typical of the standards

of medical research. Often shoddy, often designed to cover up harm or

show harm and often not done where there is a need for such work.

There must be ways of simulating the effect of an injection without

injecting, maybe administration during sleep et al. In any event the

deaths et al after or not after vaccines are hardly likely to be

simulated or faked.

The science of anaphylaxis and allergy

are long and old and evidently obselete according to governent,

regulators and vaccine makers. These adverse effects, automatic for

repeat vaccines are being ignored by those charged with our safety

after vaccines.

The untested H1N1 vaccine used in 2009

usually contained organomercury, a known neurotoxin and therefore a

dangerous chemical to encounter at any age. In addition, the vaccine

was hurriedly made. It was not subject to any testing. And it was

specifically forbidden for pregnant women.

This is typical of hundreds or

thousands of comments following its use:

Debra Giraudo says:

November

19, 2009 at 9:50 pm

My son and his pregnant wife just lost their little baby. She got

a swine flu vaccine and lost the baby that day. We would like to

join others in a class action suit. Do you have any information?

Not only have none of these any action

for the harm done but the statute allows even death to all after

vaccines to be unactionable in courts of law.

It rather surprised me to find figures

for spontaneous abortion up to 50 per cent with comments from vaccine

supporters that deaths to infants in the womb etc were actually

showing the vaccine doing its job of protecting globally the unborn

children in the USA.

I find it totally amazing that a doctor

might say to this pregnant mother, OK, you will get the vaccine at 4

o clock and you may have an abortion at 10 o clock but don't worry,

overall we will save more lives than the loss of your unborn child if

it should happen. Perhaps like some advocates for vaccines he might

add: If you dont take the vaccine you may still have the abortion

tonight.

Where are we left when during a

pandemic of H1N1 we realise we have a GENOCIDE of unborn infants

which doctors do not tell us about? And this genocide is happening

every year in the USA.

Surely health issues around the world

will show how well the USA fares in health terms?

My own anecdotal look at births in the

family 200 years ago shows a dozen births with only one gap where an

abortion could have the possibility of happening in my ancestors.

Have abortions increased with the use of pills, drugs and vaccines

and even modern food styles (GMO)?

While vaccine supporters talk of the

increased safety after thousands of adverse incidents it does seem

that in this case at least where vaccines for the pregnant mother is

NOT compulsory or where no pressure is given that the medical

researchers have an ideal opportunity to compare the vaccinated

mothers to be with equivalent mothers that avoided the vaccine. There

seems no interest in this at all.

In any event in a simple world the

worst case scenario must be used as the gold standard if we are to

have faith in the repeat use of vaccines, given at ever earlier ages

when natural immunity is being LOST causing a downward trend in

residual illness and an increase in deaths to babies at ever younger

ages. Vaccines during pregancy MUST give real benefits in saving life

and not a catalogue of hundreds and thousands of DISSATISFIED people.

Not so much lack of science all round

as BLIND FAITH in a process often of temporary effectiveness and on a

front too wide to wipe out disease, too narrow to take in fatal and

pandemic medical events at levels unacceptable. And of course in

total contradiction of even known science of toxicity and adverse

events from safe vaccines when repeated or given inappropriately as

here to pregnant mothers. Vaccine science really a VACCINE ART.

While deaths are discounted as evidence

of vaccine safety. Move forward just 8 weeks and the scenario changes

dramatically: In just over a month or two the same scenario of death

or illness for now a newborn baby immediately after vaccines will

cause an automatic police inquiry and imprisonment with no evidence

for MSBP, FII, SBS or simply strangling or plain murder.

Why isn't there a police inquiry for

the above case where death was almost instaneous after a vaccine?

PANDEMIC DEATH

ADDENDUM

It�s

interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last

week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, �Oh, you�re

talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that

year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don�t

work.� I was like, �Yeah, I know.� [laughter].

IS THIS TRUE?

And if so what

good effect will a vaccine have for the unborn child.

Even accepting

that all the thousands of people experiencing adverse events are

actually experiencing nothing of the kind, we see an attitude in

doctors and nurses (a very few) that is ACTIONABLE. If vaccine

companies have built up immunity then comments like these need

addressing. Some people are admitting their vaccines are useless but

give them. With cot deaths running in the past at 1 in 500 this leads

us to think of theroetical GENOCIDE. Today autism like spontaneous

abortion is running at UNKNOWN levels but like abortion we know

autism does exist where it should not exist.

Government may

like to add up the cost of these WELL VISITS? Some vaccines costing

more than 200 dollars for example. No wonder even here in France it

seems while the local hospital could put up the whole community,

there is NO BAR and NO HOTEL in town. What a waste of MONEY.

ADDENDUM