Tho NEUROTOXIC ORGANMERCURY healthcare standard for expectant mums in 2011?

[Guest guest]

Tho NEUROTOXIC ORGANMERCURY healthcare standard for expectant mums in 2011?Medical interventions for healthy women

and their unborn child

In 2009 in an astonishing reversal of

all recommendations from vaccine companies, the USA government

injected at times an organomercury poison into the pregnant mother.

This substance in many peoples minds had been removed from use some 9

years previously.

An interested but not government,

industry or regulatory group or person has claimed a 25 fold rise in

death following this lethal injection at low levels. Other claims

while lower are still CRIMINALLY damning if proved accurate.

For its part the government and / or

regulators claim:

THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EVENTS

What is the truth?

Claims of huge numbers of fetal deaths

by those who see no harm in mothers losing their unborn children the

same day as this vaccination, do not agree with government figures.

The 2005 set of figures for fetal death

put its level at 6 per 1 000 roughly in line with your chance of

living to be 100 or so. Also in line with the risk in years one and

two when babies get so many vaccines of dubious value. Repeat

vaccines scientifically proven to be BAD for our health.

The figures given are extremely

accurate. Quoted to two decimal places. Hence we see for one year

fetal death at 6.20 with changes being minor year by year.

The reports for 2003 and 2004 come with

addenda for ERRORS. Do governments make ERRORS? Obviously so. And if

so have they made an ERROR in claiming that there are no:

ADVERSE VACCINE REACTIONS.

The last person known by me to be

vaccinated here just failed to make an appointment for a meal and one

problem was large red angry area around her flu jab for this year.

Last year, two such friends who had jabs got the flu which then

turned to pneumonia or to be correct double pneumonia. No such known

cases for my non vaccinated friends.

The USA claims 50 per cent of the 2009

cohort of pregnant mothers were vaccinated which does not fit with

the French experience of globally less than 5 per cent or the Polish

experience of ZERO. Is this 50 per cent ACCURATE?

We can expect figures in 4 years time

for 2009 if those I found are UP TO DATE figures.

While the 25 fold figures (increased

risk of DEATH after vaccines) have been thrown out of court or more

accurately they never were ALLOWED to go to court; we are waiting

patiently for more accurate (without ERRORS) research by the USA

government and regulators who CLAIM that the vaccine reduced the

number of fetal deaths substantially.

Where is their EVIDENCE?

In 2010 and 2011 using the SAFER than

no vaccines, the repeat vaccinations continue for pregnant mothers.

Are they being used for medical experimentatation?

Here is part of one response to a

vaccine blog this winter (Oct 2011)

Last Tuesday the appointment at GMC

I received a influenza vaccine ~ Wednesday baby was fine on

Ultrasound and saw strong heartbeat (in fact they told us that it

was excellent that you could see it so early!).. On Friday was

starting not to feel “right†and Saturday m…uch of the same

~Sunday started to spot/bleed and lost the baby.

More than 400 other responses were

received in reply to this article on vaccine worries for expectant

mothers. The lady who wrote the above above is an infection control

nurse.

A healthy child is PROTECTED in the

womb (without medical interventions) and high figures of fetal death

are for unviable conceptions from the first days or so. Figures of 6

per thousand are the gold standard.

And injecting toxic mercury into

pregnant mothers could be described as the mercury standard or more

accurately the NEUROTOXIN ORGANOMERCURY standard of those charged

with looking after our HEALTH.

Medical interventions for healthy women

and their unborn child

Tho NEUROTOXIC ORGANMERCURY healthcare standard for expectant mums in 2011?