[FAMESys] Vaccines & Autism - The Wrong Argument

[Guest guest]

ALL,

Attached are the " doc " and " pdf " files of an editorial

" Vaccines and Autism -- The Wrong Argument " .

For those who do not receive attachments, a " .pdf "

version of this article can be found in the

" Documents " section of the CoMeD web site:

http://www.Mercury-freeDrugs.org

by the 25 February 2011 at the latest.

In addition, the rough text of this editorial reads

as follows:

>

>

>Vaccines and Autism - The Wrong Argument

>

>Introduction

>

> The keys to maintaining any unsafe

>commercial activity are misdirection,

>disinformation, big lies, and pervasive

>propaganda.

> To be effective, the commercial interests

>use persons whom the public trusts.

> These spokespersons then promote the

>activity.

> They lie about its risks.

> They portray an activity that is less

>than safe as not only safe but also as

>a desirable activity.

> In the place of proof of safety, these

>propagandists invariably tout the " lack of

>evidence of harm " .

> In addition, the promoters of an unsafe

>activity do all they can to bury studies

>that question the activity's safety under an

>avalanche of " recognized " studies that are

>touted as showing " no evidence of harm " .

> Those who benefit from the commercial

>activity also do all they can to discredit

>those persons who dare to publish studies

>that question the safety of the activity.

> Further, they use their wealth to buy

> " experts " who refute any link between the

>activity and the harm that it inflicts on

>the " general public " .

>

>Tobacco Products as an Example

>

> In the 1900s, the healthcare establish-

>ment and medicine were intimately involved

>in protecting the use of tobacco products.

> In the 1950s and 1960s, there were even

>commercials in which doctors who smoked

>promoted the " benefits " of smoking.

> Numerous " scientific " studies were

>published that " disproved " the link between

>smoking and lung cancer or heart disease.

> While the tobacco industry paid for much

>research, the only studies that the public

>got to see were those that showed notives even testified that they were

unaware of any " real " harm from smoking tobacco.

> Yet, some appeared to be harmed by smoking.

> It took a whistle blowing insider to

>expose the widespread collusion among the

>tobacco-product producers to conceal the

>overwhelming proof of that harm.

> The tobacco companies, through their

>attorneys, had hidden these damning studies

>behind the veil of lawyer-client privilege.

> Moreover, the peer-reviewed, published

>disinformative and misdirective " scientific "

>studies that they funded spawned the term

> " tobacco science " .

> This term was so powerful that it became

>an integral part of the American idiom.

> Today, the term " tobacco science " is

>widely used to describe the misuse of

> " science " to support any activity, like

> " global warming " or " healthcare " , in

>a manner that benefits certain business

>segments at the expense of the public's

>fiscal interests or health.

>

> " Tobacco Science "

>

> Since the early 1960s, we were

>increasingly exposed to the misuse of

>statistical " science " and the phrase " no

>evidence of harm " in the tobacco industry's

>efforts to discredit the link between

> " smoking " and " lung cancer " .

> To draw our attention away from the

>broader issue, the tobacco industry

>successfully narrowed our focus to the

> " smoking causes lung cancer " issue.

> They did this because, based on the

> " available " science, this was the hardest

>link to prove. This is the case because the

> " causes " of lung cancer are complex; and the

>delay between starting to smoke and being

>diagnosed with lung cancer is usually

>decades.

> They did this to draw our attention away

>from the broader issue. That broader issue

>was the link between " the use of tobacco

>products " and " adverse health outcomes " .

>These tobacco-product-related adverse health

>outcomes included cancer, heart disease,

>premature death and other chronic diseases.

> Unfortunately, it took until 4 February

>1996, when the TV-program Sixty Minutes

>finally aired the revelations of Dr. Jeffery

>Wigand, an executive-level PhD Biochemist

>working inside the tobacco industry.

> In that Sixty Minutes program, Dr. Wigand

>came forward and provided the American

>public his knowledge, well known among the

>tobacco industry insiders, that using

>addictive tobacco products was unsafe. He

>also calmly told the American people that

>smoking tobacco products was causal for, or

>contributory to, lung cancer, heart attack,

>and stroke as well as a number of chronic

>illnesses (e.g., emphysema and " hardening of

>the arteries " ).

> Since then, the American public has come

>to " recognize " that " big tobacco " had

>intentionally lied to the people for decades

>about the " safety " of using its tobacco

>products. Moreover, today

>that industry continues to mislead the

>people concerning the safety of its

>products.

>

>The " Vaccine-Autism Link "

>

> Currently, Americans are watching a

>similar Kabuki dance.

> Today, the pharmaceutical, academic, and

>healthcare oligarchies and apparently, to

>varying degrees, various agencies of the

>federal government are engaged in an

>intensive misdirective propaganda campaign.

> That campaign's apparent goal is to

>conceal the linkages between our current

>vaccination programs and the acute harm and

>chronic disease that the current vaccination

>programs cause.

> These groups are seeking to hide these

>adverse outcomes behind a false " Vaccines Do

>Not Cause Autism " façade.

> Further, without any real proof of

>safety, they continue to claim that vaccines

>are " the safest of medicines " .

> Unfortunately, the evidence provided by

>the independent toxicological, animal model,

>patient case, and epidemiological studies

>overwhelmingly points to a causal linkage

>between:

> * Vaccines and/or some vaccine components

> and

> * A growing number of now epidemic,

> chronic, childhood, medical conditions.

> In addition, though touted as " the safest

>of medicines " , evidence of the real harm

>that vaccines can cause continues to

>accumulate in the government's Vaccine

>Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)

>database. Unfortunately, as our government

>admits, generally " no more than 10% " of the

>actual adverse events associated with a

>given vaccination are reported.

> The vaccine propagandists, who now

>virtually control key aspects of the

>governmental apparatus, the mainstream media

>and, increasingly, even the courts, are

>continuing to successfully misdirect the

>majority of the American public.

> Currently, the American public is being

>incessantly brainwashed to:

> a. Focus on the " MMR-Autism " and,

> currently to a lesser extent, the

> " Thimerosal-Autism " linkages, but

> b. Ignore the epidemic vaccination-related

> increases in childhood diseases [1]

> that, as of 2006, now affect more than

> 1 in 4 of our children.

> c. Consider the Establishment-sponsored

> epidemiological studies and other

> biased population studies as if they

> were valid, but

> d. Ignore the valid independent studies

> that indicate causal links between the

> harm observed and the vaccinations

> received.

> In addition, to discourage independent

>research, the Establishment has increasingly

>engaged in attacks on the integrity, motives

>and expertise of the independent researchers

>who have dared to question the

>Establishment's fabricated realities.

> Further, the Establishment has recently

>increased the volume and intensity of its

>pro-vaccine propaganda. It has done this in

>an attempt to drown out the ever-increasing

>volume of reports of lifelong disability and

>death caused by an ever-growing number of

>vaccines and vaccination program doses to an

>increasing percentage of our developing

>children and ourselves.

> Unfortunately, no recognized high-level

>Establishment insider has come forward and

>been allowed to speak the truth to all

>Americans on national television about the injury, disability and death

caused by our current vaccines and vaccination programs.

>

>The " Vaccination Program-Chronic Disease " Reality

>

> The pharmaceutical industry has been

>able, through its advertising dollars, to

>define and control most of the " vaccine

>safety " information that the American public

>can see, hear or read. The pharmaceutical

>industry has been able to do this because,

>unlike most countries, the federal

>government has allowed drug companies to

>advertise its products directly to the

>American consumer.

> The industry has effectively used its

>money and the influence its advertising

>money buys to " control " the mainstream

>media. It has used this clout to bury the

> " safety " and " chronic disease " issues

>surrounding our current vaccination programs

>beneath a tidal wave of industry-favorable

>vaccine/vaccination propaganda.

> Today, if a high-level vaccine-industry

>insider were to try to expose the links

>between our current and impending national

>vaccination programs and the chronic

>diseases in our children, there probably is

>no mainstream news media outlet in the USA that would let that person

speak to the nation as Sixty Minutes did in 1996.

> Today, the American mainstream media

>focuses on the entertainment, advertising

>and propaganda businesses - it is certainly

>no longer in the business of investigating

>its advertisers.

> Yet the chronic disease and vaccination

>program realities remain:

> * From unrecognized in the 1950s [2],

> today several chronic childhood diseases

> and disorders [3] are occurring at well

> above epidemic levels [4]. By 2006, at

> least one chronic disease afflicted more

> than 1 in 2 of our children during their

> childhood and condemned 1 in 4 to at

> least one lifelong chronic disease. [5]

> * Vaccination programs have been shown to

> be a major causal factor in the growth

> of chronic disease rates in the

> developed countries.

> Instead of addressing the preceding

>realities, today's mainstream media and

>governmental officials:

> * Openly attack those who are demanding

> reasonably safe vaccines " in-use

> effective " [6] vaccines,

> * Ignore those researchers who are

> demanding that any recommended

> preventive mass vaccination program must

> be independently proven to be " medically

> cost-effective " [7],[8],

> * Label those seeking safer, and in-use-

> and cost- effective vaccines as anti-

> vaccine,

> * Label those seeking cost-effective

> vaccination programs as anti-

> vaccination,

> * Attempt to blame these vaccine-safety

> advocates and any unvaccinated child for

> all of the cases of " vaccine

> preventable " disease in the USA,

> * Seek to paint these advocates for

> vaccine safety and cost-effective

> vaccination programs as disease

> spreaders and/or evil doers,

> * Ignore and/or dismiss the obvious link

> between one or more vaccination programs

> and one or more chronic diseases,

> * Hide the reality that all live-virus

> vaccines infect all who are inoculated

> with them with the live viruses they

> contain behind unproven claims that the

> vaccine's claimed benefits outweigh the

> vaccine's risks, and

> * Disregard the reality that live-virus

> vaccines [9] infect some who have

> contact with the inoculees or the

> inoculees' bodily emissions for weeks

> after the inoculation date.

> Yet, the reality remains that the real

>issue is the obvious connection between the

>increases in the US recommended vaccination

>programs and the near-parallel increases in

>the epidemics of chronic diseases that now

>affect more than 1 in 4 [10] of our children

>for a lifetime.

> In the 1950s, the level of chronic

>childhood disease in America was so low that

>the low levels of acute disease (e.g.,

>paralytic polio at < 1 child in 3,000)

>grabbed the headlines.

> Childhood asthma was virtually unknown;

>and childhood type 2 diabetes had not even

>been identified [11].

> Today, the level of asthma, a chronic

>disease, in our vaccinated children is

>greater than 1 child in 9 (> 11 %); and,

>though our government keeps no exact

>statistics, childhood type 2 diabetes has

>increased from < 1 child in 100,000 to more

>than 1 child in 10,000.

> Yet, this news is not covered.

> There is no media outcry as more and more

>of our children become less and less

>healthy.

> The overall health of all Americans

>continues to decline as chronic disease

>levels and our recommended vaccination

>programs show parallel increases.

> Instead of the truth, we are simply told

>that we must accept our children's and our

>ever-increasing levels of an ever-increasing

>number of chronic diseases.

> We are told we must do this because these

>growing levels of chronic diseases are

> " genetic " or " caused by our lifestyle " or

> " caused by anything other than 'vaccines',

>'mercury' [12], 'adjuvants' [13], and 'other

>vaccine ingredients' " .- none of whose

> " safety " has ever been independently

>established to the standard 'nontoxic', much

>less the higher standard of 'sufficiently nontoxic …' to the children and

adults given

>vaccines starting, in many instances, from

>before their birth and, with increasing

>frequency, continuing periodically

>until death.

> We are told we must accept that our

>vaccination programs are " safe " even though:

> * The lifetime safety level has not been

> established for any one vaccine [14] and

> * The short-term safety of each of our

> current vaccination programs has not

> been properly evaluated [15].

> We are told we must accept that our

>government-approved vaccines are safe even

>though, in some instances, they are

>knowingly adulterated drugs [16] and, in

>other instances, government-approved

>vaccines seem to be knowingly mislabeled

>drugs [17].

> In spite of the Establishment's

>advertising, propaganda, and twisted

>studies, the American public is increasingly

>concerned about the " safety " of vaccines and

>our current Establishment-profit-driven

>vaccination programs.

> Increasingly, the public is beginning to

>see that our current vaccines and

>vaccination programs are, if not the cause,

>a major cause of the increasing levels of

>chronic disease in our children and in

>ourselves.

> Today, many Americans understand that

>there is an ever-growing linkage between

> " increasing doses of more vaccines and

>vaccine formulations " and " increasing levels

>of chronic disease " .

> Yet, the Establishment pro-vaccination

>propaganda, misrepresentations, and personal

>attacks continue along with the increasing

>number of vaccinations and growing levels of

>chronic disease in our highly vaccinated

>population.

> In contrast, though the Establishment

>refuses to study them, there appears to be a

>much, much lower level of chronic disease in

>our initially healthy, never-vaccinated

>children.

> Hopefully, the American public will soon

>wake up and demand that we stop all changes

>to our current vaccination programs until

>each current vaccine is independently proven

>to be " reasonably safe " and in-use

>effective, and all of the current preventive

>mass vaccinations programs are proven to be

>medically cost-effective.

> Then, let all vaccines that are not

>reasonably safe or are " deemed to be

>adulterated drugs " be withdrawn from the

>market. For those that are reasonably safe

>but are currently improperly labeled

>(misbranded), let the manufacturer

>correct the label to fully comply with all

>applicable laws without any government-

>granted exception or withdraw the vaccine

>from the market.

> In addition, we should demand that all

>vaccines that are not in-use effective in

>preventing at least 90% of those who

>vaccinated with them from contracting the

>disease they are intended to prevent should

>have their licenses revoked.

> Further, for vaccines that are reasonably

>safe and in-use effective, we should demand

>that any mass vaccination program using them

>be reduced to a program that is medically

>cost-effective.

> For those programs that cannot be made

>both in-use effective and medically cost-

>effective, we should demand that the federal government immediately revoke

any

>recommendation for all such programs.

> Then, the states should revoke any

>vaccination mandates for any vaccine that is

> " not reasonably safe " ; " not in-use

>effective " ; or " not medically cost-

>effective " .

> Additionally, the public should demand

>that all those involved in the manufacture,

>licensing or approval of any vaccine that is

>not reasonably safe and in-use effective be

>prosecuted under the RICO [18] statutes for

>colluding to damage the financial and

>physical health of the American people.

> The public should also demand that all

>who colluded with the industry to recommend any mass vaccination program

that is not

>medically cost-effective should be similarly

>prosecuted.

> Finally, to ensure that only reasonably

>safe vaccines are developed, licensed and

>approved for any use, the protections

>afforded to the vaccine manufacturers by the

>National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

>(NVICP) be stripped from the law and all

>federal governmental agencies be banned from

>indemnifying the manufacturer of preventive

>vaccine for the harm its preventive vaccines

>can cause.

> Then and only then, will the American

>public be able to begin trusting that the

>remaining vaccines are:

> * Reasonably safe,

> * In-use effective, and

> * If recommended for mass use, cost-

> effective.

> Then, the reality that " vaccination

>programs " and/or the " components " that one

>or more vaccines contain do cause chronic

>disease will slowly fade into our past.

> All that will remain is the sad

>historical reality that there was a time in

>American history when our vaccination

>programs and/or the components that one or

>more vaccines contained caused epidemic

>levels of chronic disease.

> Until then, let us engage in the correct

>argument: increases in vaccination and/or

>vaccine doses have caused and are causing

>increases in chronic diseases.

> Let us begin this argument by demanding

>an industry-independent national study that,

>by birth date, compares the health of all

>those children 6 to 18 years of age in the

>USA who were born here, have exclusively

>lived here, were initially healthy at birth,

>and have never been vaccinated to the health

>of a fully matched cohort of initially

>healthy children who have been fully vaccinated.

> Until:

> * The safety and in-use effectiveness of

> all FDA-licensed vaccines can be proven

> against a true placebo for all safety

> assessments and against a disease-

> challenge using healthy volunteers for

> in-use effectiveness,

> * The cost-effectiveness of all the

> currently recommended vaccination

> programs can be established when all

> costs, including 10 times those for all

> reported adverse events in VAERS, are

> considered, and

> * The proposed " never vaccinated " - " fully

> vaccinated " study can be completed,

> published and its findings confirmed by

> independent outside reviewers,

>let us demand that, at a minimum, using

>today's no-Thimerosal vaccines, the US

>national childhood vaccination recommenda-

>tions and state mandates be rolled back

>to those recommendations and mandates that

>were in effect in 1980.

>

>Endnotes:

>

>[1] These chronic childhood diseases

> include, but are not limited to,

> severe food allergies and

> intolerances, asthma, COPD,

> diabetes, gastrointestinal

> disease, IDCM, certain leukemias,

> MS, neurodevelopmental disorders

> and behavioral problems, obesity,

> and SIDS.

>

>[2] For this discussion, a disease is

> considered to be unrecognized if

> it was either unidentified in the

> medical literature (e.g., child-

> hood type 2 diabetes) or was

> reported to occur at a level that

> was less than 1 child in 10,000

> (e.g., autism) in the 1950s.

>[3] Example chronic diseases and

> disorders that are currently at

> or above epidemic levels include,

> but are not limited to, childhood

> asthma [at greater than 1 child

> in 9 { > 11 %}], childhood

> gastro-intestinal disorders [at >

> 1 in 100 {> 1 %}], and childhood

> autism spectrum disorders [at > 1

> %]).

>[4] Accepting that paralytic polio

> occurred at epidemic levels in

> the late 1940s and 1950s in the

> USA and that its maximum

> incidence rate in children was no

> more than 1 child in 3,000

> (< 0.033%), any childhood disease

> or disorder that occurs at a

> frequency that is greater than 1

> child in 2,000 (0.05 %) is a

> medical condition occurring at

> epidemic levels.

>[5] This statement is based on the

> results reported for the 2006

> NHANES cohort of children.

>[6] The phrase " in-use effective "

> means that, after vaccination

> with the initial series of doses

> claimed to provide protection and

> exposure of healthy volunteers to

> the disease or diseases for which

> the vaccine is claimed to be

> protective, those who are fully

> vaccinated do not contract the

> disease. Moreover, in general,

> this disease protection should

> last for not less than 10 to 50

> years and should match the

> protection level provided by

> having the disease or diseases in

> question and recovering from

> them.

>[7] The phrase " medically cost-

> effective " means that all of the

> medical costs associated with any

> vaccination program must be less

> than all of the medical costs

> that were associated with the

> level of disease occurring in the

> nation before the vaccination

> program was introduced.

>[8] In computing the costs, all costs

> including the worst-case costs

> associated with the maximum

> number of vaccinees who will be

> permanently disabled or die must

> be properly considered. In

> addition, beyond the cost of the

> vaccine dose itself, the vaccine

> program's costing must also

> consider all distribution,

> administration, tracking and

> recordkeeping costs.

>[9] At present, the live virus

> vaccines routinely recommended by

> the US CDC for administration to

> children include attenuated

> vaccines for measles, mumps, and

> rubella; an attenuated herpes

> varicella zoster vaccine (for

> " chickenpox " and " shingles " );

> genetically engineered type A and

> type B influenza viruses (for

> " flu " ); genetically engineered

> human-bovine hybrid rotaviruses;

> and a human-attenuated rotavirus.

> In addition, there are FDA-

> licensed live-virus vaccines:

> vaccinia (for " smallpox " ), yellow

> fever, the Bacillus of Calmette

> and Guerin (BCG) strain of

> Mycobacterium bovis, and

> Salmonella typhi Ty21a (for

> " typhoid fever " ).

>[10] The reported values is 26.6 %

> in the 2006 NHANES cohort of

> children followed from 2000

> through 2006.

>[11] This chronic childhood disease

> was not even recognized in

> America until the 1980s.

>[12] In today's America, the " mercury "

> in vaccines is principally the

> Thimerosal in most doses of

> influenza vaccine as well as in

> several other vaccines that are

> less commonly administered to

> children and adults. In

> developing countries, Thimerosal,

> at preservative levels, is still

> used in most, if not all, of

> their DTP, haemophylis

> influenzae, and hepatitis B

> vaccine doses.

>[13] Adjuvants are mostly insoluble

> polymeric aluminum compounds but

> also, with GlaxoKline's HPV

> vaccine Ceravix®, " organic oil-

> in-water " compounds, which are

> known human immune system

> disruptors that are used to

> increase the levels of antibodies

> formed when vaccine antigens are

> co-injected with them.

>[14] To do this, a study would have to

> be conducted comparing a cohort

> of not less than 10,000 initially

> healthy subjects who have been

> vaccinated to a matched cohort of

> 10,000 initially healthy never-

> vaccinated subjects given a " true

> placebo " (i.e., sterile isotonic

> saline) for a period of not less

> than 4.5 years.

>[15] To do this, a study would have to

> be conducted comparing a cohort

> of not less than 1,500 initially

> healthy subjects who have been

> vaccinated to a matched cohort of

> 1,500 initially healthy never-

> vaccinated subjects given a

> " true placebo " (i.e., sterile

> isotonic saline) for a period of

> not less than 50 years.

>[16] Preserved vaccine formulations

> for which the manufacturer failed

> to prove the preservative was

> " sufficiently nontoxic … " as

> required by 21 CFR § 610.15(a),

> where 21 CFR § 610.15(a) is a

> CGMP regulation and under 21 USC

> § 351(a)(2)(, a drug that fails

> to comply with all aspects of

> current good manufacturing

> practice (CGMP) is " deemed to be

> adulterated " . In general, this

> knowing failure has been admitted

> by the vaccine makers and

> officials of the US Food and Drug

> Administration.

>[17] Vaccines in which the manufac-

> turer knowingly failed to fully

> disclose the names and amounts of

> all of the components in a

> vaccine dose in a manner that, at

> a minimum, fully complies with

> all the strictures of 21 CFR §

> 210.100 for parenteral drugs

> (drugs that are injected or

> infused).

>[18] RICO is the acronym for the

> " Racketeering, Influencing, and

> Corrupt Organizations " statutes

> as set forth in 18 USC Sec 1961

> et seq.

>

>

>

>

Please share this message with others who seek

to understand the reality about the links between

the increase in vaccines and vaccine doses and the

epidemic increase in chronic childhood diseases.

Thanking everyone in advance for all of your

efforts, no matter how small, to spread this document

and its message to the four corners of the Earth.

Respectfully,

G. King, PhD

http://www.dr-king.com

Founder, FAME Systems

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++