Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Seizures after vaccines: Not so harmless as the CDC says?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

SEIZURES after VACCINES

Seizures after vaccines are a known,

accepted, adverse reaction to a vaccine.

Unlike ANAPHYLAXIS which is serious and

life threatening, SEIZURES are benign. So we are told.

http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p3072a.pdf

Impossible to find the word SEIZURE

even mentioned by the CDC!

If the CDC think they are benign why

dont they use the term?

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/vac-admin/contraindications.htm

Tells us that the 2009 version is

being UPDATED!

They occur at a rate of around 6

fold the background rate after babies vaccine at 8 weeks.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/MMRV/qa_FebrileSeizures.html

This CDC document does talk of

vaccine induced seizures once you get through the real causes of

seizure. Real to the CDC. Colds and flu give lots of people seizures

evidently. And if you get hot. Seizures after vaccines are SMALL,

NONE EXISTENT, NO ASSOCIATION in direct disagreement with their

research staff and the belated admittances even here. No previous

seizures but with this years vaccines 2010-2011 there is a problem.

The long term effects are nothing

they say. They admit 1 in 3 get repeat seizures but then say 9 out of

10 dont get epilepsy.

But they use the part that although

a vaccine seizure is the same as the non-vaccine seizures that the

risk of epilepsy is identical and for DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY!

By 52 weeks a vaccine can elicit a

threefold rate of seizure activity.

This all sounds like classic toxicology

effects; dropping off as baby gets stronger and bigger.

Are SEIZURES really benign? And even if

so, would it not be wise to wait say until two years when these

seizures would approach background rates?

Also it is known that a vaccine takes

better as baby gets older. Another benefit of waiting.

Giving MMR shots at less than 12 months

means the rate of take up of immunity is so reduced that you need a

second or third shot. And the known risks escalate.

The CDC researchers looked at MMR ten

years ago and found the increased rate of seizures after the MMR

vaccine was threefold.

More recently a quadrivalent vaccine

induced more seizures than those given at the same time in several

vaccines.

And in the last round of flu vaccines

we again get total agreement from the CDC that the seizure rate is

elevated.

If a seizure was benign and left no

after effects we could agree with the CDC on the outcomes.

But we know the children by the age of

five years can be expected to have had seizures at a rate of one

child in 25. An enormous number compared to the chance after a

vaccine even at 6 fold the background. This risk is a handful per 100

000 injected children for each vaccine.

Each vaccine represents a very low risk

of seizure but overall the rate climbs to huge levels as we get baby

vaccinated with a myriad of vaccines, several repeats and sadly in

some cases 9, 10 or 11 at once.

Anaphylaxis is now clearly stated for

each vaccine on their hand-out for adverse effects. This coming from

REPEAT vaccines in the manner researched by Nobel Winner

Richet a hundred years ago.

The effects both of anaphylaxis and

seizures are REAL, ACCEPTED adverse events AFTER vaccines.

Both can have other driving forces.

Vaccines are one part only of the risks.

Doctors claim the seizure is scary but

benign. But is it?

A seizure activity in England for an

adult is an automatic two year suspension of your driving in most

cases unless an alternative explanation to epilepsy is found.

Two repeat seizures and epilepsy is an

almost inevitable conclusion. Epilepsy is not a benign illness.

Death and sudden death are real risks

for epilepsy patients. In the UK this figure for sudden epilepsy

death was around 750 sudden deaths per year. One that affected me was

of a friend in sturdy health at lunch time and dead by tea time.

Sudden, yes, unexpected yes! At this time I was only vaguely aware of

this risk and hardly thought it was at a level comparable to SIDS.

If two seizures are serious then why

not one?

A political answer might be it would

stop the vaccine uptake dead in its tracks. Why would people want a

serious adverse effect affecting up to 1 in 25 (not all from

vaccines) by giving lots of vaccines to baby?

In fact because of the lax attitude by

doctors it is unlikely the true rate is anywhere near the figures

quoted. Only a determined parent will get the baby seen and the event

recorded properly.

We have a genuine benign effect of

vaccines admitted but not really benign only politically so. And

although the event is beyond dispute, it is clearly at a rate much

higher than admitted.

Vaccines are given and needed to keep

HEALTHY people, HEALTHY. Why should we not be recording faithfully

every adverse event and taking it seriously? There is little point in

vaccinating people who then die a month later.

As a rule of thumb, it appears as if

safe vaccines of yesterday are now not so safe as vaccines given

today. Alternative vaccine regimes are therefore being advised and

not well received.

It seems odd that seizures after

vaccines are not talked of but madcap doctors recommending schedules

where seizures are known to drop to background rates are getting a

bad press. Do doctors that inject really want babies to have high

rates of benign seizure activity?

Seizures lead to epilepsy which link to

autism by known accepted linkages and all start with a vaccine giving

a very low risk but rising as we vaccinate younger and more often

with many vaccines together.

Known and accepted science leads us to

a better method of vaccines for babies but to date accepting a

seizure as benign and hiding the unknown extent of seizures and

denying that 50 to 100 more seizures have a link to vaccines is not

helping our vaccine safety effort or doing much for the health of the

USA child today.

SEIZURES after VACCINES

see also

In 2001 while denying harm from MMR in

the UK this paper came out by the CDC team.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa003077

How many on this next paper had their

one day Hep B shot?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2939969/pdf/nihms204351.pdf

Free paper explains well some

biochemistry to date for seizure activity:

This shows by ignoring what happens to

children you risk the same as an adult.

It all takes time, so the myth that

iuts good news to look for a vaccine seizure on the day or even a

week later is so so wrong. So how many of the 80 fold non-vaccine

seizures are actually vaccine related. We just dont know.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131729/pdf/CN-9-388.pdf

or the same for 63 dollars from

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cn/2011/00000009/00000002/art00013

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...