Guest guest Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 SEIZURES after VACCINES Seizures after vaccines are a known, accepted, adverse reaction to a vaccine. Unlike ANAPHYLAXIS which is serious and life threatening, SEIZURES are benign. So we are told. http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p3072a.pdf Impossible to find the word SEIZURE even mentioned by the CDC! If the CDC think they are benign why dont they use the term? http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/vac-admin/contraindications.htm Tells us that the 2009 version is being UPDATED! They occur at a rate of around 6 fold the background rate after babies vaccine at 8 weeks. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/MMRV/qa_FebrileSeizures.html This CDC document does talk of vaccine induced seizures once you get through the real causes of seizure. Real to the CDC. Colds and flu give lots of people seizures evidently. And if you get hot. Seizures after vaccines are SMALL, NONE EXISTENT, NO ASSOCIATION in direct disagreement with their research staff and the belated admittances even here. No previous seizures but with this years vaccines 2010-2011 there is a problem. The long term effects are nothing they say. They admit 1 in 3 get repeat seizures but then say 9 out of 10 dont get epilepsy. But they use the part that although a vaccine seizure is the same as the non-vaccine seizures that the risk of epilepsy is identical and for DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY! By 52 weeks a vaccine can elicit a threefold rate of seizure activity. This all sounds like classic toxicology effects; dropping off as baby gets stronger and bigger. Are SEIZURES really benign? And even if so, would it not be wise to wait say until two years when these seizures would approach background rates? Also it is known that a vaccine takes better as baby gets older. Another benefit of waiting. Giving MMR shots at less than 12 months means the rate of take up of immunity is so reduced that you need a second or third shot. And the known risks escalate. The CDC researchers looked at MMR ten years ago and found the increased rate of seizures after the MMR vaccine was threefold. More recently a quadrivalent vaccine induced more seizures than those given at the same time in several vaccines. And in the last round of flu vaccines we again get total agreement from the CDC that the seizure rate is elevated. If a seizure was benign and left no after effects we could agree with the CDC on the outcomes. But we know the children by the age of five years can be expected to have had seizures at a rate of one child in 25. An enormous number compared to the chance after a vaccine even at 6 fold the background. This risk is a handful per 100 000 injected children for each vaccine. Each vaccine represents a very low risk of seizure but overall the rate climbs to huge levels as we get baby vaccinated with a myriad of vaccines, several repeats and sadly in some cases 9, 10 or 11 at once. Anaphylaxis is now clearly stated for each vaccine on their hand-out for adverse effects. This coming from REPEAT vaccines in the manner researched by Nobel Winner Richet a hundred years ago. The effects both of anaphylaxis and seizures are REAL, ACCEPTED adverse events AFTER vaccines. Both can have other driving forces. Vaccines are one part only of the risks. Doctors claim the seizure is scary but benign. But is it? A seizure activity in England for an adult is an automatic two year suspension of your driving in most cases unless an alternative explanation to epilepsy is found. Two repeat seizures and epilepsy is an almost inevitable conclusion. Epilepsy is not a benign illness. Death and sudden death are real risks for epilepsy patients. In the UK this figure for sudden epilepsy death was around 750 sudden deaths per year. One that affected me was of a friend in sturdy health at lunch time and dead by tea time. Sudden, yes, unexpected yes! At this time I was only vaguely aware of this risk and hardly thought it was at a level comparable to SIDS. If two seizures are serious then why not one? A political answer might be it would stop the vaccine uptake dead in its tracks. Why would people want a serious adverse effect affecting up to 1 in 25 (not all from vaccines) by giving lots of vaccines to baby? In fact because of the lax attitude by doctors it is unlikely the true rate is anywhere near the figures quoted. Only a determined parent will get the baby seen and the event recorded properly. We have a genuine benign effect of vaccines admitted but not really benign only politically so. And although the event is beyond dispute, it is clearly at a rate much higher than admitted. Vaccines are given and needed to keep HEALTHY people, HEALTHY. Why should we not be recording faithfully every adverse event and taking it seriously? There is little point in vaccinating people who then die a month later. As a rule of thumb, it appears as if safe vaccines of yesterday are now not so safe as vaccines given today. Alternative vaccine regimes are therefore being advised and not well received. It seems odd that seizures after vaccines are not talked of but madcap doctors recommending schedules where seizures are known to drop to background rates are getting a bad press. Do doctors that inject really want babies to have high rates of benign seizure activity? Seizures lead to epilepsy which link to autism by known accepted linkages and all start with a vaccine giving a very low risk but rising as we vaccinate younger and more often with many vaccines together. Known and accepted science leads us to a better method of vaccines for babies but to date accepting a seizure as benign and hiding the unknown extent of seizures and denying that 50 to 100 more seizures have a link to vaccines is not helping our vaccine safety effort or doing much for the health of the USA child today. SEIZURES after VACCINES see also In 2001 while denying harm from MMR in the UK this paper came out by the CDC team. http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa003077 How many on this next paper had their one day Hep B shot? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2939969/pdf/nihms204351.pdf Free paper explains well some biochemistry to date for seizure activity: This shows by ignoring what happens to children you risk the same as an adult. It all takes time, so the myth that iuts good news to look for a vaccine seizure on the day or even a week later is so so wrong. So how many of the 80 fold non-vaccine seizures are actually vaccine related. We just dont know. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131729/pdf/CN-9-388.pdf or the same for 63 dollars from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cn/2011/00000009/00000002/art00013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.