J G Dathan Paediatrician

[Guest guest]

J G Dathan, Paediatrician, Acrodynia

and intake of MERCURY

Are the SBS experts EXPERT and if so at

what?

While f Warkany and his 1948

discovery of mercury poisoning was still not accepted years later,

JGD could be seen for example in the BMJ championing his cause in

England for many years.

The British Government as late as April

1952 would give no public warning of harm from mercury products.

British children were dying or becoming ILL from IGNORANCE.

That couldn't happen today?

Nevertheless, JGD continues to

investigater and finds in one patient in 1954:

A month later X-Ray

examination showed extensive decalcification of the long bones. …Some

six months after his skeleton presented with normal radiological

features.

From 1954 BMJ for Jan 30 page 247.

The implication of mercury exposure and

reactions of long bones when examined by radiology must be considered

vital, important and critical.

Every year 900 000 such cases are seen

in 2011 and put down to abuse by carers: SBS.

This finding contradicts the current

idea of SBS and the triad used to imprison so many carers, parents

and mothers for the past 20 years. Are INNOCENTS going to jail?

I have personally seen such an X-ray

described as proof of harm and the witness states clearly that all

bones in the body were abused. I have obtained corroboration from

eminent paediatricians who are in absolute agreement that the X-ray

shows a deficiency condition and NOT abuse.

Just how you damage a long bone in a

100 different places with micrometer symmetric precision of

arrangement while leaving the external soft tissue pristine and

unbruised defies the imagination.

While we regale the doctors of yester

year who for a hundred years or 40 years had not a clue to the cause

of acrodynia, Swift's Disease or Pink's Disease, they at least

recognised it as infectious, nutritious, vitamin deficient or toxic.

Today with one million sudden deaths (a

feature of acrodynia) and tens of millions SBS (all identical murders

mimicking this finding for acrodynia above) we might think of reverse

technology? Were we more astute years ago, than today?

Today our experts can't identify a

disease syndrome but find imaginary reasons for a cause they claim as

abuse. Wrong diagnosis and even more wrong EXPLANATION. The real

cause for any illness cannot be found until we accept a disease

exists. Therefore to jump ahead to conclusions of parental or carer

harm seems too hasty.

Todays autism, sudden deaths and SBS

and yesterdays acrodynia, Swift's Disease or Pink's Disease may well

yet have a common aetiology.

Mercury poisoning.

So are these reactions vitamin

deficiency as I thought or are they more likely a sure sign of

MERCURY poisoning.

Are the SBS experts EXPERT and if so at

what?

J G Dathan, Paediatrician, Acrodynia

and intake of MERCURY