Guest guest Posted March 6, 2011 Report Share Posted March 6, 2011 Just something that stuck me and I most likely wrong but this part of the ruling " The Supreme Court acknowledges that they are indeed, unavoidably unsafe " makes me wonder if this has not helped us in some way. If vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. The word unavoidably make me think that it should strengthen your right to refuse it. The only way to avoid being harmed is not to take it. Since we no longer have the right to sue in court, wouldn't that also strengthen the right to refuse. For so many years they have admitted that vaccines can cause harm to a very small number of people. Most states have religious exemptions, and medical exemptions except for a few that have nothing but medical. Isn't it time now to challenge the right of states to mandate something that is unavoidably unsafe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.