The three card trick

[Guest guest]

The three card trick

DeStefano is a past master at proving the impossible. In 2010 with a dozen other

scientists, ten years worth of

investigations and millions of dollars he does it again.

Injecting the worlds most toxic compound for the pre-natal infant or one day

child is the best way to protect them

from the scourge of autism or imperfect wiring or whatever in the brain of your

child.

You will of course also have lost your home, job and money as you will have

succumb to the many three card sharks

around town if you accept such poor work.

Vaccine take up in the USA is high and for the western world is typically in the

90 per cent range and rarely less

than the 80 per cent necessary for herd immunity.

Any research such as this into any illness and the link to vaccines is going to

be impossible to prove or disprove

to any significance and yet here we see the CDC team in action trying to prove

the impossible or more like trying to

pull the wool over peoples eyes. The research can never prove anything and

before going into such expensive time

consuming study it would have been good to put forward results which would from

such work prove the harm of a brain

destroying chemical when injected into a person. I claim this would be

impossible for the live born child.

With deaths possibly from vaccines at around 1 in 500 to 1 in 2 000 or so and

autism at the rate of 1 in 50 to 1 in

200 a survey of children and their vaccine status is certain to prove nothing

other than no difference. And so it

came to pass, the difference in mercury exposure for the most part was around 2

per cent with one exception. The

ability from such minimal differences to show a 40 per cent reduction in autism

for those taking the mercury vaccine

is nothing short of remarkable use of statistics. And of course nothing short of

remarkable for the three card shark

who fleeces you for your money when you can follow the lady with your eye so so

easily.

Apart from the fallacy of this study which was done in all honesty or so we are

told there is a mountain of error in

collecting, collating and concluding the innocence of a brain destroying

chemical exposed to infants at more than a

thousand times the reference levels. We have to say reference level as the level

at which signs of clinical harm is

called the reference level rather than the level at which death, destruction of

the brain and a hundred other

negative medical events relentlessly begin for pretty obvious reasons.

So whether you say a thousand times a reference level or a thousand times higher

than that to cause autism, death or

whatever, it is the same thing. They say the bigger the lie the more people will

believe you. To get anyone to

deliberately inject themselves or their tiny baby with this thimerosal is beyond

comprehension. But only today

through the mail in France the demand to do this to protect yourself is still

extant. The best way to protect

yourself from a mild illness is to give yourself a 200 fold shot of brain

destroying mercury and possible gulf war

type maladies if this fits.

For ASD with regression for example an exposure of 140µG is recorded compared

to controls at 137µg. So here

everybody is over toxified more than 500 times showing first the ability of

everyone to resist huge toxic events or

more like the inability of man to find harm when clearly all are exposed to

harm.

In a personal study of harm from vaccines I have found a 90 per cent blow of the

head in the clinical records where

experts go on to indite the family father mother or carer for SBS. Children

given a mercury vaccine crying for hour

after hour until exhausted in a hospital setting and nothing done by the staff

except to hand the infant to the

parent.

Harm is done to children and experts whether scientists or medical failing in

their duty except to demand more of

the same.

How does a 2 per cent change of mercury exposure ( 140 cf to 137) come out at a

40 per cent reduction in autism for

those with more brain destroying mercury injections? It makes no biological

sense as the team state. It makes no

toxicological sense either. In fact the best you can say is the work is rubbish,

expensive rubbish and time

consuming rubbish.

Does it take much brain power to realise you are talking of real people facing

hard decisions. If just one family in

50 thought for a moment that vaccines had a negative impact, they could stop at

two vaccines for hepatititis or even

delay the vaccine just enough to be in the next time zone. Of course although

there is a blinded trial, there is

« expertise » in selecting the candidates by interview before this blinding

even begins. The medical equivalent of

the three card trick maybe or maybe not.

The research was based on 800 or so with autism out of a population of just

under 72 000 who all get mercury

injections. A kill rate in the sense of the end result of autism of more than

one in a hundred. And chillingly, many

more suspect cases in the healthy group.

The need for honest, straightforward and even clever research to prove, find,

search diligently for the cause of

autism cannot be overstated. As an amateur looking at health issues for more

than a decade I cringe and cannot

believe at times, not only the arrogance, the incompetency but the inability to

listen to people at the bottom level

who know but are just ignored. I note in this research it wasn't the autism

children that concluded these

researchers were not be trusted but those with healthy children. It must say

something for modern day USA when those

that survive the gauntlet of autism from brain destroying injections get nervous

when scientists want to experiment

with their healthy infant. The small passing remarks in this paper do show the

machinations from a dozen people

allowing these small but important points to mock the whole study.

I note as always there was no search for dead babies in this study. Let us

remember a toxic chemical at a thousand

times the level of reference can be expected to kill as well as cause autism.

Let dead babies rest in peace perhaps.

The known lethal toxicity for thimerosal means that most of the healthy dead

babies and many of those falsely

diagnosed as dead from other harmless causes could really be hiding mercury harm

as well. The study of SIDS has long

been known to be as corrupt as the modern studies on autism. If only honesty was

the name of the game in 1969 when

SIDS was put forward we may have avoided the 20 year battle to see if brain

destroying compounds actually destroy

brains. But even back in 1969 any mention a toxic brain destroying chemical was

met with an immediate – DONT BE

STUPID reply.

Despite the uselessness of such a poor research project except for propaganda

purposes where it excels, it made one

gaff or to be polite it found one staring example of mercury harm causing autism

and a finding most most alarming.

Pre-natal exposure to 3.34µg of mercury resulted in autism compared to only

1.86µg for the controls. Since one

mercury injection can deliver 25µg of mercury and as there is clear over

numbers of autism from such a tiny amount

on average of mercury, it does show immense, worrying and fatal harm from

mercury vaccines for our children. It also

underlies the uselessness of low mercury injections which can deliver this

amount of thimerosal. The safe level of

brain destroying mercury for little babies and big men is zero.

The paper is fraudulent, as it can never get results showing harm from the

design of the research and knowledge of

normal high vaccine rates. Where they found the pre-natal harm, they just

pretended it wasn't there. Many ordinary

folk have been saying for more than a decade that children from families with

blood incompatibility seem to have

high numbers of autism in the family. We have been told this is not true but

here in a useless experiment where no

possibility of mercury harm can be expected we see that even they forgot that

for the pre-natal child there would be

a vaccinated versus non-vaccinated result of catastrophic impact for those

saying brain destroying mercury does not

destroy brains. From their poor design it shows harm from miniscule amounts even

of mercury only highlighting the

problem to every child from the massive over-dosing of mercury for the USA

child.

Again simple comparison for Europe where less autism results from less mercury

vaccines delivered more slowly seems

to escape the experts who cannot even see this simple result at no cost in

money, manpower but simply relies on

simple common sense.

Again as a simple person they show 256 ASD children divided into 49 with

regression and 187 just autism. The numbers

just don't add up;

But then the entire paper just doesn't add up.

Unless of course you are taken in by

The three card trick