Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

DeStefano the CDC WONDER

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

CDC Wonder

Anyone on this site who wants to investigate health effects using the CDC

databank would do well to look at this

site.

Looking at a new paper by DeStefano « proving » mercury is fine to

inject into everyone, I decided to look at

the actual USA death rates to children from birth;

My reasoning is that a toxic chemical will be more deadly for a little baby than

a heavier one. Standard toxicology

in fact.

So using CDC Wonder data I chose California parents having one child and found

this:

1.0 to under 1.5 Kg 2 deaths from 39 or a death rate of 51.3 per thousand

1.5 to under 2.0 Kg 7 deaths from 365 or a death rate of 19.2 per thousand

2.0 to under 2.5 Kg 17 deaths from 1970 or a death rate of 8.6 per thousand

2.5 to under 3.0 Kg 14 deaths from 3448 or a death rate of 4.0 per thousand

3.0 to under 3.5 Kg 9 deaths from 2354 or a death rate of 3.8 per thousand

3.to under 4.0 Kg 2 deaths from 786 or a death rate of 2.5 per thousand

I would expect deaths to be less with lighter babies but a difference of this

size for me indicates CERTAIN toxic

exposures to infants with the lighter babies dying off at a greater rate.

It is self evident the value of the site and also the simplicity to obtain

results, as this exercise took about one

minute.

Even at the lightest weight we see survival for 948 of 1 000 babies and at

heaviest weight survival of 997 of 1 000

babies.

With care for the child, I see no reason for this huge discrepancy in life

expectancy as most babies survive at all

weights and any difference should be minimal UNLESS they are subject to TOXINS.

A good reason why the rate falls dramatically for me is indeed the TOXIC nature

of injecting mercury into babies and

the normal lethal dose effect coming into play taking out more of the light

members as expected by simple

toxicology.

As DeStefano has been campaigning to inject mercury into little babies for

more than a decade shown first by

the commissioning of small studies to show a different effect than that

discovered by Tom Verstaeten on a huge and

accurate database now lost to humanity or so we are told he might if he had any

scruples suggest the vaccine

campaign of injecting a toxic percury posion into infants even if that vaccine

was diluted more than a hundred fold

might have the humanity to suggest waiting until the little babies had become

heavier and more able to handle this

most toxic substance.

Conclusions:

Unless you have a strapping baby – then vaccinating with poisons will not

increase life expectancy but could raise

the chance of dying more than 10 fold. Which is better? A dead baby fully

vaccinated or a live baby vaccinated with

care and at a slower rate.

European countries BANNED mercury vaccines up to nearly 50 years ago and the

rate of autism is about ten times LESS.

Using a mercury vaccine still toxic even if diluted a hundred fold is attempted

murder and the effect on the smaller

baby is well known to DeStefano and the CDC.

My enquiries discovered his retirement in 2006 from the CDC so why is he at the

CDC in 2010 as this paper tells us.

Further you find that even DeStefano finds that babies in the womb ARE in

danger of death from mercury filling

in the last link to even lighter babies than mentioned above.

Mercury is not out of vaccines despite the ten year old PROPAGANDA that confuses

most people as to the amount of

mercury still used in vaccines.

No paper that does not measure mercury is not fit to be considered as proving

ANYTHING but is of interest ONLY.

Measurements actually taken on people suffering dementia show a level of mercury

only FOUR times what is in ONE

mercury vaccine.

The more than 95 per cent refusal to take a mercury vaccine by the ADULT French

population shows a perpicacity

lacking for Destefano and the CDC.

Seizures when mercury vaccines are injected into adults shows a huge rise in the

number compared to a similar time

interval before the vaccine.

The fact this is not seen in infants is that crying and leaving them to get over

a blown up head from mercury

toxicity shows yet more contempt heaped on the almost obligatory vaccination

unless you are a « bad » parent.

It took a hundred years to show multiple vaccines cause ANAPHYLAXIS and a

hundred years on ANAPHYLAXIS is only not

found because of legal and medical attitiudes shown by « research » of such

poor quality.

Instead of proving a negative for the Nth time it is high time that the CDC

actually looked at what DOES cause

autism or better accept the results of Tom Verstaeten many years before they saw

the light of day in a controlled

scientific journal after suitable modification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...