Guest guest Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 CDC Wonder Anyone on this site who wants to investigate health effects using the CDC databank would do well to look at this site. Looking at a new paper by DeStefano « proving » mercury is fine to inject into everyone, I decided to look at the actual USA death rates to children from birth; My reasoning is that a toxic chemical will be more deadly for a little baby than a heavier one. Standard toxicology in fact. So using CDC Wonder data I chose California parents having one child and found this: 1.0 to under 1.5 Kg 2 deaths from 39 or a death rate of 51.3 per thousand 1.5 to under 2.0 Kg 7 deaths from 365 or a death rate of 19.2 per thousand 2.0 to under 2.5 Kg 17 deaths from 1970 or a death rate of 8.6 per thousand 2.5 to under 3.0 Kg 14 deaths from 3448 or a death rate of 4.0 per thousand 3.0 to under 3.5 Kg 9 deaths from 2354 or a death rate of 3.8 per thousand 3.to under 4.0 Kg 2 deaths from 786 or a death rate of 2.5 per thousand I would expect deaths to be less with lighter babies but a difference of this size for me indicates CERTAIN toxic exposures to infants with the lighter babies dying off at a greater rate. It is self evident the value of the site and also the simplicity to obtain results, as this exercise took about one minute. Even at the lightest weight we see survival for 948 of 1 000 babies and at heaviest weight survival of 997 of 1 000 babies. With care for the child, I see no reason for this huge discrepancy in life expectancy as most babies survive at all weights and any difference should be minimal UNLESS they are subject to TOXINS. A good reason why the rate falls dramatically for me is indeed the TOXIC nature of injecting mercury into babies and the normal lethal dose effect coming into play taking out more of the light members as expected by simple toxicology. As DeStefano has been campaigning to inject mercury into little babies for more than a decade shown first by the commissioning of small studies to show a different effect than that discovered by Tom Verstaeten on a huge and accurate database now lost to humanity or so we are told he might if he had any scruples suggest the vaccine campaign of injecting a toxic percury posion into infants even if that vaccine was diluted more than a hundred fold might have the humanity to suggest waiting until the little babies had become heavier and more able to handle this most toxic substance. Conclusions: Unless you have a strapping baby – then vaccinating with poisons will not increase life expectancy but could raise the chance of dying more than 10 fold. Which is better? A dead baby fully vaccinated or a live baby vaccinated with care and at a slower rate. European countries BANNED mercury vaccines up to nearly 50 years ago and the rate of autism is about ten times LESS. Using a mercury vaccine still toxic even if diluted a hundred fold is attempted murder and the effect on the smaller baby is well known to DeStefano and the CDC. My enquiries discovered his retirement in 2006 from the CDC so why is he at the CDC in 2010 as this paper tells us. Further you find that even DeStefano finds that babies in the womb ARE in danger of death from mercury filling in the last link to even lighter babies than mentioned above. Mercury is not out of vaccines despite the ten year old PROPAGANDA that confuses most people as to the amount of mercury still used in vaccines. No paper that does not measure mercury is not fit to be considered as proving ANYTHING but is of interest ONLY. Measurements actually taken on people suffering dementia show a level of mercury only FOUR times what is in ONE mercury vaccine. The more than 95 per cent refusal to take a mercury vaccine by the ADULT French population shows a perpicacity lacking for Destefano and the CDC. Seizures when mercury vaccines are injected into adults shows a huge rise in the number compared to a similar time interval before the vaccine. The fact this is not seen in infants is that crying and leaving them to get over a blown up head from mercury toxicity shows yet more contempt heaped on the almost obligatory vaccination unless you are a « bad » parent. It took a hundred years to show multiple vaccines cause ANAPHYLAXIS and a hundred years on ANAPHYLAXIS is only not found because of legal and medical attitiudes shown by « research » of such poor quality. Instead of proving a negative for the Nth time it is high time that the CDC actually looked at what DOES cause autism or better accept the results of Tom Verstaeten many years before they saw the light of day in a controlled scientific journal after suitable modification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.