Guest guest Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Now can we ALL shout?..... WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CHARLESTON, S.C., July 27 -- /PRNewswire/ -- Today, Policyholders of _America_ (_http://topics.sacbee.com/America/_ (http://topics.sacbee.com/America/) ) (_POA_ (_http://topics.sacbee.com/POA/_ (http://topics.sacbee.com/POA/) ) ) released a consensus statement written by treating physicians and researchers in the field on the mechanism and treatment of illness found in people sickened by exposure to water-damaged buildings. This illness has been the subject of heated debate that has resulted in harsh allegations being Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Sharon, My only concern is that many Drs. won't read the information and still only treat the symptoms when they see patients. I have many friends who are treated for different things and I know they are working in moldy schools or workplaces. They don't listen to me and say they have diabetes, arthritis, dermatitis, migraines, and more. It's not only physicians who don't understand it's people in general. I am keeping my fingers crossed that more and more physicians will listen so they can help their patients!!! This certainly is a GIANT leap for everyone!!!! I sent the information on to ALL my family and friends!! Thanks for everything you do!!! Sue Sue, I would say so. What is very good about this paper, among other things, is that Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome CIRS has an ICD 9 code. These codes are what physicians must follow when diagnosing a patient and prescribing treatment. So, unlike those who carry the label for their illness of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity MCS, which has no ICD code, and thus the physicians have a difficult time with insurers when trying to treat if that diagnosis is given; the label of CIRS-WDB will help the physician to be able to do with what he needs to - while adhering to the rules of the system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Thanks for everything you do, too, Sue. It takes us all. I think if WE on this board could start using the term " Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome " (CIRS - WDB), when describing these illnesses, it would help much to start getting that ICD 9 Code approved name into common language and thus into the doctor's offices. In a message dated 7/29/2010 12:18:05 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ssr3351@... writes: Sharon, My only concern is that many Drs. won't read the information and still only treat the symptoms when they see patients. I have many friends who are treated for different things and I know they are working in moldy schools or workplaces. They don't listen to me and say they have diabetes, arthritis, dermatitis, migraines, and more. It's not only physicians who don't understand it's people in general. I am keeping my fingers crossed that more and more physicians will listen so they can help their patients!!! This certainly is a GIANT leap for everyone!!!! I sent the information on to ALL my family and friends!! Thanks for everything you do!!! Sue Sue, I would say so. What is very good about this paper, among other things, is that Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome CIRS has an ICD 9 code. These codes are what physicians must follow when diagnosing a patient and prescribing treatment. So, unlike those who carry the label for their illness of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity MCS, which has no ICD code, and thus the physicians have a difficult time with insurers when trying to treat if that diagnosis is given; the label of CIRS-WDB will help the physician to be able to do with what he needs to - while adhering to the rules of the system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Thanks Sharon, good post. > > Sue, > > I would say so. What is very good about this paper, among other things, > is that Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome CIRS has an ICD 9 code. > These codes are what physicians must follow when diagnosing a patient and > prescribing treatment. So, unlike those who carry the label for their illness > of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity MCS, which has no ICD code, and thus the > physicians have a difficult time with insurers when trying to treat if that > diagnosis is given; the label of CIRS-WDB will help the physician to be able > to do with what he needs to - while adhering to the rules of the system. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 Sharon, so is it safe to say and in agreement by our experts that the reactions, whatever they may be, when re-exposed to a chemical/toxin, after you have been basically sensitized or maybe better said,recieved the damages to you system that cause you to react to further toxin insults, is based on a inflammatory responce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 And, wouldn't it be a fare statement to say that the more damage to organs and tissues that you recieved during your inital exposure the more worse a inflammatory responce might be that you would have with re-exposure to a chemical/toxin.? (as far as only physical damage, other immune effects aside for a moment) and that this itself could explain some of the difference in the reactions from mild to severe. given that dose does matter but we have no way to deturmine that, really. but if it were able, that two people exsosed to the same dose of the same toxin would have different levels of reaction based on the damage they had suffered to those certain organs/tissues that are now being assulted again by a toxin, as for example, the difference that one may suffer in the nasal to brain route, olfactory system, and the difference between haveing brain fog and seizure type symptoms, being ruled by the amount of damage there, therefore possably also the level of inflammatory responce one might have. this makes sence to me, because the more damage to tissues and organs, the more of a inflammatory responce you would have. and I dont think alot of people are understanding this. but really, it needs to be understood because the longer you say in a WDB, exspecially if it's a moderate dose exposure, but even at possabily a lower dose exposure, if there is toxin exposure involved, the more damage to tissues and organs you well recieve. because really at even low dose exposures, mycotoxin exposure can and does make it past the mucosa barriors,ect. at some rate from what I understand. I'm pretty convienced that high dose exposures well basically forse one to get out sooner than later but chances are the damage will have already been done, but at lower dose exposure, one may just not reconize that what is happening to them is tied to that WDB and could suffer for years, depending on exactually what they are exposed to and how those certain toxins can affect certain organs, plus no doubt, some effects that still might not be fully reconized. > > Sue, > > I would say so. What is very good about this paper, among other things, > is that Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome CIRS has an ICD 9 code. > These codes are what physicians must follow when diagnosing a patient and > prescribing treatment. So, unlike those who carry the label for their illness > of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity MCS, which has no ICD code, and thus the > physicians have a difficult time with insurers when trying to treat if that > diagnosis is given; the label of CIRS-WDB will help the physician to be able > to do with what he needs to - while adhering to the rules of the system. > > As such, I would strongly suggest anyone who has the " inflammation gone > wild " from an exposure to the microbes in WDBs, start using the term Chronic > Inflammatory Response Syndrome from Water Damaged Buildings " CIRS-WDB " when > describing the illness they have acquired from the environmental exposure. > > _http://www.policyholdersofamerica.org/doc/CIRS_PEER_REVIEWED_PAPER.pdf_ > (http://www.policyholdersofamerica.org/doc/CIRS_PEER_REVIEWED_PAPER.pdf) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 The answer is yes. [] Re: 7.27.10 Research Shows Controversial Illness is Real and ... Sharon, so is it safe to say and in agreement by our experts that the reactions, whatever they may be, when re-exposed to a chemical/toxin, after you have been basically sensitized or maybe better said,recieved the damages to you system that cause you to react to further toxin insults, is based on a inflammatory responce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 I got my MCS, EI, from a WDB feel really bad for those who did not get it like this and still do not have a code. Although there are many codes for poisoning which is really what MCS is slow systematic poisoning of your organs , ................................then I have so many other things from WDB with codes and still it has been hard getting treatment due to complete ignorance of the Dr's I have seen. Cannot get into the right Dr due to the ignorance of Medicaid !  Mayleen ________________________________ From: osisposis <jeaninem660@...> Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 6:57:15 PM Subject: [] Re: 7.27.10 Research Shows Controversial Illness is Real and ...  And, wouldn't it be a fare statement to say that the more damage to organs and tissues that you recieved during your inital exposure the more worse a inflammatory responce might be that you would have with re-exposure to a chemical/toxin.? (as far as only physical damage, other immune effects aside for a moment) and that this itself could explain some of the difference in the reactions from mild to severe. given that dose does matter but we have no way to deturmine that, really. but if it were able, that two people exsosed to the same dose of the same toxin would have different levels of reaction based on the damage they had suffered to those certain organs/tissues that are now being assulted again by a toxin, as for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.