BMJ rapid responses re: Deer............edited and censored........

[Guest guest]

It was Yazbak responding to Deer and his access to patient records and

verifying his grandson's treatment with Wakefield and then Stone and

and Bill Welsh talking about the same - why does Deer have access

to medical records................maybe , who is here has a copy of

her post.

Deer was who was feeling threatened as he was 'outed' by himself

that he had all the patient records and knew who they were and where they

lived

Interestingly that one is still there

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/feb02_4/c644#232399

Here are the ones by Stone & Bill Welsh (i had saved

them)

Re: Patient

Confidentiality 12

March 2010

Stone,

Contributing editor: Age of Autism

London N22

Send response to journal:

Re: Re: Patient Confidentiality

Prof Dodge raises some

interesting questions. It might be one kind of issue if Mr Deer had legal

access to the documents and possibly misused them, but what if he did not

have legal access? Would this still be a matter for the civil courts, or

something else? I think we need clarification.

Competing interests: Autistic son

Patient Confidentiality

12

March 2010

Bill Welsh,

President

Autism Treatment Trust. Edinburgh EH3 7BJ

Send response to journal:

Re: Patient Confidentiality

Professor Hodge,

and Stone touch on probably the most alarming aspect of the

already disturbing MMR debacle: The provision of the medical records of

vulnerable children to a tabloid journalist.

Unless ‘medical ethics’ is a one-way street applicable only to Dr

Wakefield and his colleagues there was apparently a monumental breach of

ethics at the Royal Free Hospital. One assumes a criminal investigation

was instigated (with full police involvement) by Dr Ari Zuckerman and Dr

Pegg (senior witnesses against Dr Wakefield) because anything

less would be totally unacceptable to the British public and one hopes to

the medical community.

In today’s pervert laden Britain there have been far too many examples

of slipshod attention by medical supremos to the safety of children.

Perhaps Ari Zuckerman or Pegg would be kind enough to enlighten

us regarding what action was taken.

But what about Horton, Lancet Editor, surely he knew earlier than

anybody that the journalist had obtained confidential records. Why did he

personally not actuate a police enquiry?

The list of doctors who knew but were content to do nothing is becoming

endless.

It would appear that the destruction of Dr Wakefield et al was

paramount. Ethics, integrity, rectitude and even common sense lost out in

the race to destroy the careers of three fine physicians.

Competing interests: Grandfather to an autistic boy.

I DON'T HAVE HILARY'S - but will get it

Here is Stone's summary on AofA

http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/brian-deer-blunders-in-british-medical-journal-.html#more

Deer Blunders in British Medical Journal

Sheri

check

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/feb02_4/c644#233328

someone threatened the BMJ

They took Professor Dodge's letter out and Stone's and

's and Bill Welsh

They removed one sentence from Yazbak's........... this part

" He should relax and take a deep breath "

Sheri

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start March 24, March 31, & April

1

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

" Vaccine Dangers Activists " group.

To post to this group, send email to VaxActivistsgooglegroups.