Guest guest Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 I really expected there to be interest in this. We need data! > > It's been noted before that the polling capabilities that yahoo provides are too limited for our > needs. I have a bit of programming experience and access to my own server. The main thing I > want to add are the ability to specify the remedies which did not work and the ability to select > what symptoms the remedies helped and how efficacious they were. Is this something I > should go for? If so I will work up a draft for your input. > > If I was to setup a comprehensive poll would we be able to make participation a requirement > for joining the PSSD group? I'd like participation to be as comprehensive as possible so we > can gather the data we need to quazi-scientifically assess the problem and possible > solutions. Another advantage of this setup is that we can statistically analyze the data in ways > we cannot do with the current poll. For example we might notice that Dostinex occasionally > works for men but seems useless for women or vice-versa. What does everyone think? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 Hi Biologic, I think it would be VERY IMPORTANT, if something could be worked out. I would not mind being involved in helping phrase the questions! JR > > > > It's been noted before that the polling capabilities that yahoo provides are too limited > for our > > needs. I have a bit of programming experience and access to my own server. The main > thing I > > want to add are the ability to specify the remedies which did not work and the ability to > select > > what symptoms the remedies helped and how efficacious they were. Is this something I > > should go for? If so I will work up a draft for your input. > > > > If I was to setup a comprehensive poll would we be able to make participation a > requirement > > for joining the PSSD group? I'd like participation to be as comprehensive as possible so > we > > can gather the data we need to quazi-scientifically assess the problem and possible > > solutions. Another advantage of this setup is that we can statistically analyze the data in > ways > > we cannot do with the current poll. For example we might notice that Dostinex > occasionally > > works for men but seems useless for women or vice-versa. What does everyone think? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 Didn't you get the email from Velden? We're planning to do a publishable survey of the group, and you could certainly help set it up online. Vornan > > > > It's been noted before that the polling capabilities that yahoo provides are too limited > for our > > needs. I have a bit of programming experience and access to my own server. The main > thing I > > want to add are the ability to specify the remedies which did not work and the ability to > select > > what symptoms the remedies helped and how efficacious they were. Is this something I > > should go for? If so I will work up a draft for your input. > > > > If I was to setup a comprehensive poll would we be able to make participation a > requirement > > for joining the PSSD group? I'd like participation to be as comprehensive as possible so > we > > can gather the data we need to quazi-scientifically assess the problem and possible > > solutions. Another advantage of this setup is that we can statistically analyze the data in > ways > > we cannot do with the current poll. For example we might notice that Dostinex > occasionally > > works for men but seems useless for women or vice-versa. What does everyone think? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.