Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

please take time to post comment - FW: What do you think about fluoride?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Friends,

Please take the time to post a comment about the truth of sodium

silicofluoride and sodium hexafluorosilicate poisons aka “water

fluoridation chemicals” forcibly placed into our water supplies

under the guise of “dental health” – we still have to

reach a lot of people who have no clue that they are consuming toxic waste from

industries.

I notice the article never referred to the massive overdose back

in May, 2009 I think it was in the Warner/Joyner area. To

those who may not know of Langbroek Opposition Leader, he is a

silicofluoride loving Dentist!

Thank you, Di

From: The

Anti-Fluoridation Association of

Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 1:32 PM

To: The Anti-Fluoridation Association of

Subject: Fwd: What do you think about fluoride?

To List -

Here's your opportunity to HAVE YOUR SAY ( you'll be

redirected to the Courier

Mail site) re the BIOCIDE FLUORIDE.

Fluoride underdosing and plant headaches:

health breaches

SOUTHEAST

Queensland's fluoridated water is still in breach of health regulations almost

a year after the roll-out of the controversial policy.

SEQWater

is still struggling to get the concentration of the chemical right, with

underdosing at one of the five treatment plants in the most recent September

quarter, while another plant remained out of action.

What do you

think about fluoride? Have your say.

Queensland

Health reports that were released to The

Courier-Mail reveal three other sites across Brisbane and the

Gold Coast also underdosed supplies in the second quarter to June last year.

But

SEQWater has dismissed concerns over the reliability of the plants and insisted

the erroneous levels were expected but should be eliminated in the next

quarterly report.

The

lingering errors come after revelations last year that all five plants failed

to hit their marks and underdosed residents in the first three months of the

roll-out.

But

now the two subsequent quarters show that while accuracy is improving, errors

are still occurring.

Water

supplies should be fluoridated between 0.7mg/L and 0.9mg/L. But in the three

months to June 30, plants at North Pine (0.34mg/L), Mt Crosby (0.44mg/L) and

Mudgeeraba (0.54mg/L) all missed the regulated range.

In

the September quarter, the Molendinar plant on the Gold Coast recorded an

average of 0.68mg/L. North Pine was still offline after an overdose debacle in

May when Brisbane residents received 20 times the allowable limit.

Natural

Resources Minister on yesterday welcomed the reports'

accountability to the public.

" I

look forward to seeing the concentrations reaching the regulated range in the

new year, " he said.

Authorities

only have to comply on an average basis over the quarter to meet regulations

but the reports show every plant has days when as little as 0.01mg/L is

recorded.

Anything

over 0.4mg/L on average has health benefits.

Opposition

Leader - Langbroek said the results raised more questions about

promises the roll-out would be safe and controlled.

" What

we are seeing, time and time again, is water suppliers failing to meet the

standards for fluoride delivery, " Mr Langbroek said.

An

SEQWater spokesman expected the all clear next quarter after a

" conservative approach " until now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...