RE: Re: Response To The facts on mercury, preservative in vaccines

[Guest guest]

Oh yes Lenny…you most certainly did say “maybe”….yet

I still stand on what I stated. They DO NOT want to print the

TRUTH. “Flaming” or not…I have read on OTHER topics

very “FLAMING” words that were PRINTED regarding what was stated by

the press in a previous article. Not to mention the ‘flaming’ words

they use against us; i.e.“parasites” and “putting society at

risk yadda yadda yadda” etc…funny how the ‘sheeple’

society do not find those FLAMING words boring, but actually truthful. When

it comes to this topic…they will not touch it with a “ten-foot pole”

let alone on their ‘tippy-toes’.

No, Lenny you are not a liar…it is what it is…they

will not publish anything that is truthful regarding this topic.

Autism=Mercury Poisoning

T.

From:

EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of schaferatsprynet

Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 3:01 PM

To: EOHarm

Subject: Re: Response To " The facts on mercury,

preservative in vaccines "

,

I said " maybe " the reason they didn't publish it, didn't I ? That

was constructive criticism in an effort to see that his important messages,

which I respect, get more widely reproduced. The fact is that you will almost

never see letters to the editor in print media with " you lie! " in it.

For most people, flaming is boring reading. If we want to get the word out, to

reach beyond the two or three thousand who already read here and places like

AoA, we have to do better than flaming, name calling and group speak. If I am

wrong, call me a liar, I guess. . .

Lenny

> >

> > One Scientist's Response To " The facts on mercury, preservative

> > in vaccines " Posted by Dr. Molly O'Shea on Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at

> > 7:12 AM at:

> >

> http://apps.detnews.com/apps/blogs/askthepediatrician/index.php?category=Vac

> > cinations

> >

> > [NOTE: Comments also submitted on 18 Dec 2009 to

> > " detnews.com " but not published.]

> >

> >

> > In your recent article, " The facts on mercury, preservative

> > in vaccines " , why did you apparently feel compelled to lie

> > about the on-going presence of Thimerosal at preservative

> > levels in vaccines given to children?

> >

> > Especially, why lie about the influenza vaccines recom-

> > mended to be given to children 6 months and older since

> > 2002 -- and currently annually to children until they

> > turn 18, when the influenza vaccines (both seasonal and,

> > in 2009, A-H1N1), are such that most doses (>75%) of

> > the inactivated vaccines contain a preservative level

> > of Thimerosal (49.55-wt% mercury) and a 0.5-mL dose is

> > only safe (if you think the EPA's reference dose [RfD;

> > 0.1 microgram of mercury per kilogram of weight per day]

> > for ingested mercury is an adequate safety level for

> > INJECTED mercury [which it is NOT]) when the " child "

> > getting the 25-microgram dose of mercury from Thimerosal

> > in the 0.5-mL vaccine dose weighs at least 250 kilograms

> > (551+ pounds)?

> >

> > How is a mercury dose that exceeds the EPA RfD mercury

> > amount by a factor of 125 (for the 0.25-mL vaccine dose)

> > and 250 (for the 0.5-mL dose) " minuscule " when the

> > " child " who get the 0.25-mL dose typically weigh less

> > than 18 kg and the " child " who gets the 0.5-mL dose

> > typically weighs less than 70 kg?

> >

> > How can Thimerosal used as a preservative be safe when

> > the toxicity studies required by law (21 CFR 610.15(a))

> > since the late 1960s have NOT been conducted (as the

> > FDA and the vaccine makers have repeatedly admitted

> > or failed to refute)?

> >

> > How is a dose of mercury that exceeds the putative " safe

> > level " (the putative no observed adverse-effect level

> > [NOAEL]) for injected Thimerosal-related mercury (based

> > on a chronic toxicity study in rats that is cited and

> > recognized by the FDA) of < 0.0042 micrograms of mercury

> > /kilogram of weight per day for developing humans by

> > more than a factor of 2900 for a 0.25-mL dose or more

> > than a factor of 5900 for a 0.5-mL dose EITHER SAFE or

> > MINUSCULE?

> >

> > Since Thimerosal has NOT been removed from all doses of

> > all of the vaccines administered to pregnant women and

> > developing children, isn't your assertion, " the rates

> > of autism have actually continued to increase despite

> > the removal of thimerasol from vaccines " , a KNOWING

> > FALSEHOOD?

> >

> > Since when can population studies be used to prove

> > whether or not an ingredient in a vaccine is

> > toxicologically safe?

> >

> > When you can provide:

> > 1. A list of ALL FDA-licensed vaccines that can be

> > routinely given to pregnant women and children

> > at any age and that list contains NO vaccine --

> > NOT one -- that contains ANY level of Thimerosal,

> > and

> > 2. The published toxicity studies that prove that,

> > with at least a 100-fold safety margin, it is

> > safe to expose a developing fetus weighing < 100

> > g to 50 micrograms of Thimerosal OR a 3-kg 6-month

> > old to 25 micrograms of Thimerosal from a seasonal

> > flu shot and 25 micrograms of Thimerosal from a

> > " swine flu " shot on the same day, then, we can

> > talk about the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines

> > and the safety of Thimerosal in vaccines.

> >

> > Until then, it should be obvious to all that you are

> > lying about the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines

> > and about the unproven safety of INJECTED Thimerosal

> > at the levels found in Thimerosal-preserved vaccine

> > doses of inactivated-virus flu vaccines recommended

> > by the CDC to be administered to pregnant women and/

> > or to children 6 months to 18 years of age.

> >

> > Should any want factual information about Thimerosal

> > in vaccines or Thimerosal's putative mercury toxicity

> > when injected or related subjects, then they should

> > read the applicable documents posted on:

> > http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org.

> >

> > Moreover, if you or anyone wants to know about the

> > in-use effectiveness of most of the current vaccines

> > recommended for mass vaccination in the United States

> > and rational vaccination schedules, the draft reviews

> > of the report produced by the State of Florida Depart-

> > ment of Health that are also posted on the cited web

> > site should provide a good starting point.

> >

> > As to the other issues, I see no need to address them

> > because your posting's title, " The facts on mercury,

> > preservative in vaccines " , should only have ACCURATELY

> > addressed Thimerosal, the mercury preservative in

> > yesterday's and TODAY'S influenza (and a few other)

> > vaccines that are FDA-approved and recommended by the

> > CDC to be administered to children and/or pregnant

> > women.

> >

> > Hopefully, after reading this response and checking

> > the facts, you will, at a minimum, know: Thimerosal

> > has NOT been removed from vaccines administered to

> > pregnant women and children as well as adults of all

> > ages.

> >

> > Respectfully,

> >

> > G. King, PhD

> > http://www.dr-king.com

> >

> >

> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

> >

>