Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: WHO PROFITS FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN? AND FROM OTHER INVESTMENTS…

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

yes, explosive...............

EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: WHO PROFITS FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH

PLAN? AND FROM OTHER INVESTMENTS…

By Jon Rappoport

www.insolutions.info

www.nomorefakenews.com

DECEMBER 25, 2009. I have to begin by saying you need to know

about Walter Burien.

http://CAFR1.com

Walter curls people’s hair. For many years, he has been

investigating the investments made by governments. The what?

I know. This sounds like a non-sequitur. Governments aren’t

businesses, are they?

It turns out they are. Well, when you think about it, it’s

obvious. They run, for example, retirement funds for their

employees, and those funds make investments, they don’t just store money

in shoe boxes.

Recently, Walter provided a link to the New York State Retirement Fund

Asset Listing (March 31, 2006). You can find it at:

http://cafr1.com/STATES/NEWYORK/RETIREMENT/NYRINV2006.PDF

This document shows the investments this fund makes, and the value of

each stock holding. The implications are enormous. For

example, when you pinpoint the many pharmaceutical stocks, you realize

New York State government will be a primary beneficiary of any national

health plan. Why? Because drug companies, under such a plan,

will be selling far more drugs as millions of new, previously uninsured

people come under the federal umbrella.

Any piece of news that makes the pharma landscape glow tends to shoot up

stock values.

From a financial point of view, it would be ridiculous to assume New

York State government would oppose national health insurance. It’s

good for business. The business of, yes, New York State

government.

And by the way, to the extent that some of these drug companies

manufacture vaccines (and they do), the New York State government would

be a big-time supporter of the mass vaccinations that accompany each new

phony epidemic, such as Swine Flu. Again, for business

reasons. In fact, we may now understand a new reason why, until

huge protests derailed it, New York tried to make the H1N1 vaccine

mandatory for all state health workers.

Here are some of the pharmaceutical listings in the New York Retirement

Fund. The value of each stock holding is as of Mar.31,

2006.

Schering-Plough: $138,013,129

Barr: $39,152, 525

Baxter: $105,606, 745

Gilead: $127,348,101

Roche: $87,762,875

MedImmune: $46,942, 968

Sanofi-Aventis:$153,887,891

Bayer: $39,318,918

Bristol-Myers Squibb: $195,807,422

GlaxoKline: $137,729,350

Pfizer: $834,756,329

Novartis: $131,221,033

Merck: $344,768,742

Eli Lilly: $249,409,636

Vertex: $17,947,395

Drug companies. $2.5 billion and change. One retirement

fund in one state.

Walter Burien goes much further­and here you would have to consult

his site for supporting evidence. He states that, when you look at

the various investment funds of the 50 state governments, and when you

consider the possibility that many of these funds act (invest) in

concert, governments turn out to be controlling stockholders in some of

the biggest corporations in America.

Turn that thought over in your mind a few times.

Here’s another explosion: To what degree did the federal bailout

bail out the New York State government? Well, among the 2006 NY

Retirement Fund listings, we have:

Goldman Sachs: $268,770,613

Bank of America: $896,993,638

Citigroup: $1,036,682,080.

This gives another perspective on what a fed bailout means. It

functions as profit protection. For a state government.

Imagine state legislators and other state officials consulting THE

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO of their state government before they vote for or

against legislation.

The hits keep coming.

“As governor of your state, my friends, I am taking every action I can to

assure the profits of this administration continue to rise. As

taxpayers, you are the stakeholders. What you pay us, we

invest. Of course, we never show you the balance sheet, and we

never indicate whether we need your taxes, or whether our profits alone

are sufficient for running the state. But that’s the way the game

works. You stay in the dark. When we raise your taxes, we

give you reasons­which may be accurate or sheer nonsense. The point

is, we keep taking your money and investing it…”

JON RAPPOPORT

www.insolutions.info

www.nomorefakenews.com

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start January 6 & 7

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...