[dr-king] The On-going Struggle for Choice in Vaccination

[Guest guest]

All,

Today, an essay titled, " The On-going Struggle

for Choice in Vaccination " , is attached and

available for all those receiving direct e-mails.

This essay is provided in the hope that all who

receive it will forward it to everyone that they

know.

You MAY need Adobe Reader v. 6 or later to

read these files.

For those who need a " doc " file, please send

an e-mail with " TOS_CIV_Dec2009 " in the " Subject "

line, the file or files you need, and the reason

for your need in the body of the document.

For those who do not receive direct e-mails,

the rough text of this essay reads:

>The On-going Struggle for Choice in Vaccination

> By G. King, PhD

>

> " Never, never, never give up "

>

> " Success is not final, failure is not

> fatal: it is the courage to continue

> that counts "

>

> - Sir Winston Churchill

>

>

> Introduction

>

> In 2005, an article in the American Journal of Public

>Health[1] by K. Mariner, JD, LLM, MPH, J.

>s, JD, MPH, and Leonard H. Glantz, JD with the

>Department of Health Law, Bioethics and Human Rights,

>School of Public Health, School of Law, and School of

>Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Mass.,

>comprehensively reviewed the progression of the Court's

>view of forced public health mandates from 1905 through

>the end of 2004.

> Their paper ended by observing:

> " One practical reason for protecting constitutional

> rights is that it encourages social solidarity.

> People are more likely to trust officials who protect

> their personal liberty. Without trust, public

> officials will not be able to persuade the public

> to take even the most reasonable precautions during

> an emergency, which will make a bad situation even

> worse. The public will support reasonable public

> health interventions if they trust public health

> officials to make sensible recommendations that are

> based on science and where the public is treated as

> part of the solution instead of the problem. Public

> health programs that are based on force are a relic

> of the 19th century; 21st-century public health

> depends on good science, good communication, and

> trust in public health officials to tell the truth.

> In each of these spheres, constitutional rights are

> the ally rather than the enemy of public health.

> Preserving the public's health in the 21st century

> requires preserving respect for personal liberty " .

>

>

> Today's Realities

>

> Today we, the People, face clearly unconstitutional

>federal and state laws crafted after " 9/11 " using

> " bioterrorism " as their pretext and enacted:

> § Under the color of law,

> § At the behest of the pharmaceutical industry and

> the other facets of the healthcare establishment,

> § Without truly open public debate and/or public

> acceptance, and

> § In the case of the federal " PREP Act " , attached

> to an unrelated defense appropriation bill,

> finally titled, " Department of Defense, Emergency

> Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes

> in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act,

> 2006 " , by conference committee members who, as

> with the previous " Lily " riders that were inserted

> in a previous defense appropriation in the dark

> of night and subsequently repealed, were obviously

> serving interests other than those of the people.

>

> The federal laws enacted in 2004 ( " Biodefense I " )

>and late 2005 ( " PREP Act " ) not only unconstitutionally

>strip the people of the right to sue for redress if

>injured but also delegate to a non-elected, political

>appointee (the Secretary of Health and Human Services

>[the Secretary of HHS or, simply, the Secretary]) the

>unilateral right, stated to be not subject to judicial

>review, to suspend the normal federal safeguards for

>drug approvals and to protect all those involved in

>any aspect of any item he or she declares is related

>to a possible pandemic from being held accountable

>for their actions unless: a) the Secretary grants the

>persons alleging harm the right to seek redress and

> the persons alleging harm have proof that the

>person or persons being sued acted with the explicit

>intent to harm said person or persons or were grossly

>negligent in their actions.

>

> In the area of vaccination, the state laws generally

>void all but " recognized medical exemptions " for any

>mandated vaccination program and allow public health

>officials to mandate vaccination programs and/or

>quarantine at sites designated by the public health

>officials whenever the state's governor declares a

> " health emergency " - whether or not there really is a

>health emergency.

>

> Thus, since 2006, the people's constitutionally

>guaranteed rights, including their right to seek

>redress for harm done to them or their children or

>wards in any court and the constitutionally recognized

>right to due process of law and bodily integrity, have

>been and/or are being summarily trampled under and a

>de facto Pharma-Healthcare control state has been

>and/or is being erected in the United States of

>America.

>

> Following the PREP Act, first came the 2006

> " possible bird-flu pandemic " that not only failed to

>meet the then-current World Health Organization's

>definition of a " pandemic " but also failed to cause

>more than about 300 hundred human cases - all outside

>of the United States.

>

> Nonetheless, on April 17, 2007, our FDA approved a

> " bird flu " vaccine[2].

>

> Even after two doses of this Thimerosal-preserved

>vaccine - with each dose delivering nominally 49

>micrograms of Thimerosal-derived mercury or a total

>of about 98 micrograms of mercury within one month[3],

>this sanofi-pasteur A-H5N1 " bird flu " vaccine only

>provided " 45 percent of individuals who received the

>90 microgram, two-dose regimen " with a level of

>antibodies " that is expected " [not guaranteed] " to

>reduce the risk of getting influenza " [not guaranteed

>to prevent even that " 45 percent " from contracting

>influenza].

>

> Worse, as the FDA admitted, there were " no reported

>human cases of H5N1 infection in the United States " .

>

> Nonetheless, without the manufacturer's submitting

>the toxicity testing required to prove that the

>Thimerosal used as the preservative was " sufficiently

>nontoxic … " (as required by 21 CFR § 610.15(a)), the

>FDA, ignoring the FDA-binding requirements set forth

>in 21 CFR § 601.4(a), approved this less-than-

>effective vaccine for a non-existent disease [the

> " 2004 " " A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1, clade 1) " [4]].

>

> Next, in 2008, public health officials " identified "

>another " possible influenza pandemic " situation and

>the then Acting Secretary of HHS began issuing

>Emergency Declarations for antiviral drugs and other

>items to protect everyone from all liability under

>the " possible pandemic " rubric built into the PREP Act.

>Moreover, to convert the reported " Swine Flu "

>outbreaks into a " pandemic " situation, in 2009,

>the World Health Organization:

> · Changed its definition of " pandemic " [5] to omit 2

> key requirements, " a high morbidity " and " a high

> mortality rate " so that, after the change, all

> that was needed for there to be a " pandemic " was

> that: a) there must purportedly be a disease new

> to a population - or at least a disease that had

> not surfaced for a long time, this disease

> must be caused by disease-causing agents that

> infect humans, causing serious illness, and

> c) the agents must spread easily and sustainably

> among humans, and

> · On June 11, 2009, using its new definition,

> declared that the current A-H1N1 ( " Swine Flu " )

> influenza outbreaks to be an " influenza

> pandemic " [5].

>

> On June 15, 2009[6], Secretary of Health and Human

>Services Kathleen Sebelius extended the PREP Act

> " pandemic " declaration to include vaccines for a

>specific 2009-A-H1N1 influenza strain.

>

> Then, on September 15, 2009[7], acting under the

>Secretary's " Emergency Declaration " for A-H1N1

>influenza ( " Swine Flu " ) vaccines, the U.S. Food and

>Drug Administration (FDA), using its questionable

> " Emergency Use Authorization " authority, approved

>four (4) A-H1N1 vaccines (one Thimerosal-free live-

>virus " mist " vaccine and 3 inactivated-virus

>vaccines[8].

>

> In addition, on Friday, October 23, 2009, " BARACK

>OBAMA, President of the United States of America "

>proclaimed[9] " the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in

>the United States constitutes a national emergency " ,

>which, according to said proclamation, allows the

>Secretary of HHS to " exercise the authority under

>section 1135 of the SSA to temporarily waive or

>modify certain requirements of the Medicare,

>Medicaid, and State Children's Health Insurance

>programs and of the Health Insurance Portability

>and Accountability Act Privacy Rule throughout the

>duration of the public health emergency declared

>in response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic " .

>

> Next, on November 12, 2009 (subsequently corrected

>to November 16, 2009[10]), the FDA approved another

>Thimerosal-preserved A-H1N1 vaccine formulation.

>

> Thus, we, the People, now face:

> Ø An obviously artificial " flu pandemic " , and

> Ø The Secretary's dubious " Emergency Declaration "

> for said ersatz " flu pandemic " covering " Swine

> Flu " influenza vaccines as well as approvals

> of incompletely tested influenza vaccines that

> provide marginal protection (protecting less

> than half of those who will be vaccinated from

> only " one " [11], " novel " 2009-A-H1N1 strain of

> influenza[12]) under the FDA's questionable

> " Emergency Use Authority " made possible by the

> Secretary's issuance of the aforesaid, at best,

> problematic " Emergency Declaration " .

>

> To add insult to injury, the information about

>these " Swine Flu " vaccines provided to the people

>(as well as to " healthcare professionals " ) is both:

> Ø Less-than-accurate and, at best, misleading and

> Ø Based on a misrepresented history derived from

> " related " vaccines that contain three strains

> of purportedly non-novel influenzas (a type B

> strain and 2 type A strains).

>

> Then, without: a) regard to their possibly dif-

>ferent adverse effects and adverse effects arising

>from the interaction between the seasonal influenza

>and the " Swine Flu " influenza or consideration

>for the probable doubling of the mercury exposure

>in most who will, of necessity, be vaccinated with

>the multi-dose inactivated-influenza vaccines, the

>U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

>(CDC) recommended that pregnant women and young

>children be vaccinated with both the trivalent

>seasonal and " Swine Flu " vaccines.

>

> Moreover, the CDC made these recommendations

>without: a) warning that the effects on the fetus

>and the reproductive capability as well as the

>mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of these vaccines

>are not known or even suggesting that, where

>possible, only the mercury-free vaccines should

>be given to pregnant women and young children[13].

>

> Furthermore, based on the reports received and

>those published in the national media,

> Ø Most all of the cases of " Swine Flu " are not

> even influenza and the small percentage that

> are actually " influenza " cases are mostly not

> infections by the 2009 A-H1N1 strain of

> influenza;

> Ø Public health officials are still trying to

> " scare " and/or otherwise pressure the public

> into taking both the seasonal flu and the

> " Swine Flu " vaccines;

> Ø Most of the public is electing to avoid the

> " Swine Flu " vaccine;

> Ø Most of the healthcare providers are electing

> to avoid either the " Swine Flu " vaccine or

> both types of influenza vaccines; and

> Ø The providers of the inoculations for all of

> these vaccines are not only giving the

> potential recipients less-than-truthful

> information about the vaccines but also, in

> several instances, both pregnant women and

> young children received the wrong vaccine

> and some children got the wrong dose of

> vaccine.

>

> If the preceding realities have not undermined

>the people's trust in public health officials,

>public health officials have seized upon this

>fabricated " Swine-Flu Pandemic " to push their

>stalled agenda to mandate annual influenza

>vaccination throughout America even though they

>know, or should know, that influenza vaccines

>are not effective in preventing those who are

>inoculated with them from contracting influenza.

>

>

> Opposition to Forced Vaccination/

> The Struggle for Personal Choice

>

> Arrayed against today's forced-vaccination

>mandates stands a small, but growing, group of

>hundreds of clergy, doctors, lawyers, nurses,

>researchers, scientists, teachers, and other

>professionals who are affected by various

>vaccine issues.

>

> Behind this growing group stand hundreds of

>thousands of citizens who, at a minimum, have

>a possibly vaccine-damaged child, grandchild,

>niece, nephew, brother, sister, first, second,

>third or fourth cousin, or other family member,

>or friend or acquaintance who has one or more

>of these who have a possible vaccine-related

>injury in their family.

>

> Moreover, the public officials and others

>behind the influenza vaccination mandates,

>such as those in New Jersey and US Air Force

>childcare centers, have consciously chosen to

>use their " control " of the governmental health

>agencies and the mainstream media to ridicule

>any who oppose their near-religious, but

>scientifically unsupported, belief in the

>sanctity of vaccines and mandated vaccination

>programs.

>

> In addition, these vaccination-mandating

>individuals seem to knowingly ignore the

>fundamental shortcomings in the flu vaccines

>as well as in most of the other vaccines and

>vaccination programs.

>

> These flaws include, but are not limited to:

> Ø The need for multiple vaccine doses to

> provide " full protection " from the " disease "

> or the " disease component " ,

> Ø The limited duration of the protection

> provided by the recommended initial

> vaccination protocols,

> Ø The lack of any protection for some percent

> of those vaccinated,

> Ø The lack of proven effectiveness/safety in

> protecting those vaccinated from the disease,

> Ø The need for " booster " doses, and

> Ø The serious collateral damage to the immune,

> neurological and other systems of some who

> are inoculated with vaccines from the non-

> disease components in the vaccine (e.g.,

> Thimerosal, polymeric hydroxyaluminum com-

> pounds, gelatin, egg protein, extraneous DNA,

> adventitious viruses, cell debris, and

> formaldehyde - to name a few).

>

> Worse, they have conveniently " forgotten " the

>established Public Health principle that no

>vaccine should even be recommended for a mass

>vaccination program unless, including the worst-

>case long-term costs from the adverse events

>that that vaccine may cause, the vaccination

>program is truly cost effective.

>

> Moreover, these vaccination apologists have

> " forgotten " that those who oppose forced vac-

>cination range from:

> Ø Those who simply oppose such mandates on

> constitutional grounds to:

> Ø Those who oppose mass inoculation for vac-

> cines for diseases, like influenza and

> herpes Varicella zoster, where, based on

> even the available adverse reactions and

> their costs, the vaccines' cost and the

> true in-use effectiveness data, the vaccines

> are not effective, much less cost effective,

> to:

> Ø Those who are simply opposed to forcing

> anyone to get any vaccine under any cir-

> cumstance either because:

> ¨ Vaccination violates their deeply held

> religious/philosophical beliefs or

> ¨ Based on their research and study,

> o Vaccines cause more long-term

> chronic disease, harm and death

> than the few childhood diseases

> for which we have a vaccine that

> is truly cost-effective to use for

> mass vaccination, and/or

> o Exposure to these childhood diseases

> is safer than inoculation with a

> vaccine for a childhood disease

> because:

> · In a truly healthy environment

> where: a) there is no smallpox;

> measles and rubella are rare;

> c) there have been no confirmed

> diphtheria cases or paralytic

> polio cases in the last half

> decade; and d) tetanus occurs

> mostly in the elderly, the risk

> of harm from the disease is

> vanishingly small and/or,

> · Once you have had: a) a mumps

> infection on both sides of your

> neck, or a pertussis infection

> promptly treated with the appro-

> priate antibiotics, or c) a prompt-

> ly treated rotavirus infection, or

> d) an untreated acute Hepatitis A

> or B, or an untreated HPV infection

> from which you recover, you have

> near-lifetime immunity, and/or

> · For many reasons, vaccines provide,

> at best, only limited protection

> from contracting a " vaccine preven-

> table " disease if subsequently ex-

> posed to it, and/or,

> · Vaccines weaken rather than streng-

> then the capability of the immune

> systems of those who are inoculated

> with said vaccines to differentiate

> between self and not self - signifi-

> cantly contributing to the observed

> increases in a variety of immune and

> autoimmune diseases that, before

> 1950 where very rare (< 1 in 10,000)

> but are increasingly common (e.g.,

> asthma occurring at a rate of about

> 1 in 9 in today's vaccinated children),

> and/or

> o In today's environment in America, healthy

> kids should contract the remaining endemic

> childhood diseases to which those born in

> America before 1950 were most certainly

> exposed, and/or to:

> Ø Those who hold some combination of the preceding

> views or other vaccination-questioning views.

>

> Finally, all need to understand that, today, with

>each attempt to compel some group to be inoculated

>with some vaccine(s), particularly with flu vaccines

>that have dubious effectiveness and unproven safety

>at best, the number of people who oppose forced

>vaccination grows along with the public's:

> Ø Loss of trust in vaccination and

> Ø Determination to:

> ¨ Actively oppose forced vaccination and,

> increasingly, most vaccination programs and

> ¨ Teach their children and all with whom they

> are acquainted to oppose:

> o The forced vaccination that is currently

> imposed on any group as well as

> o Any and all attempts to increase vaccine

> mandates.

>

> Thus, unless the Establishment abandons its

>attempts to mandate vaccination on additional

>groups and reverses course by making all vacci-

>nation voluntary with incentives for those

>vaccines that are reasonably safe and truly cost

>effective, then, not tomorrow but in the not-too-

>distant future, the number of people that are

>opposed to vaccination will grow until they are

>clearly in the majority.

>

>In closing, let us remind the establishment that

>we, the People, understand the reality of

> lin's admonishment, " We must all

>hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang

>separately " .

>

> Moreover, on the issue of forced vaccination,

>though diverse in our views on vaccines and

>vaccination, we, the People, shall hang together

>and continue to grow our numbers daily.

>

> Furthermore, we understand lin's

>admonishment " They that can give up essential

>liberty to obtain a little temporary safety

>deserve neither liberty nor safety " .

>

> Therefore, we are striving to take back all

>of the essential liberties that, since September

>11, 2001, if not before, the federal government

>has been and is attempting to take from we, the

>People.

>

> Let us remind the federal government and the

>governments of the states that the Constitution

>of the United States of America begins by

>stating: " We the People of the United States,

>in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish

>Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide

>for the common defence, promote the general

>Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to

>ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and estab-

>lish this Constitution for the United States of

>America " .

>

> Moreover, the Tenth Amendment, which ends the

>so-called " Bill of Rights " added to " this

>Constitution for the United States of America " to

>ensure the American People's hard-won freedoms

>would no be usurped by the governments established

>or permitted by the People's Constitution, states:

> " The powers not delegated to the United States by

>the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the

>States, are reserved to the States respectively,

>or to the people " .

>

> However, though the Federal Courts have repeat-

>edly recognized the coercive police powers of the

> " States " in the area of forced vaccination, we,

>the People, have not forgotten that we, the People,

>who are citizens of these " States " :

> Ø Retain the powers not delegated by us to the

> federal government or to the " States " and

> Ø Also, directly or indirectly, retain the right

> to retake any power that has been " delegated "

> to the " States " or, for that matter, to any

> other governmental unit.

>

> Further, let all be assured that, no matter what

>the cost or how long it may take, we, the People,

>will: a) stop the attempts to mandate more vaccines

>and roll back all vaccination mandates where,

>in the United States of America, mass vaccination

>is not truly cost-effective when all the costs are

>considered, including the injury-related costs from

>unsafe/adulterated vaccines.

>

> Therefore, if strongly opposed, we will resist

>and push back ever harder until, if our oppression

>continues unabated, we, the People, become the

>majority in all of the States, Commonwealths,

>Districts and Territories and when that happens,

>we will: a) outlaw all mandatory vaccination

>programs in America and only allow voluntary

> " opt in " vaccination policies.

>

> Awakened from our complacence, we, the People,

>who oppose forced vaccination and our children,

>and our children's children unto seven genera-

>tions and beyond, will:

> Never, never, never, never, never, never

> give up until vaccination choice is

> universally allowed in the United States

> of America. - G. King

>

Hopefully, the information provided in this

e-mail will be helpful to you in understanding

today's realities and the need for choice in

vaccination.

Respectfully,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

CoMeD Science Advisor

PS: If you find errors or areas that need

clarification, please send them to me.

*******************************************

*The information provided in this email *

*and any attachment thereto is just that *

* -- information. *

* *

*It is not medical advice and it does not *

*require any specific action or actions. *

* *

*While the information is thought to be *

*accurate, no representation is made as *

*to the accuracy of the information posted*

*other than it is my best understanding of*

*the facts on the date that this email and*

*any attachments thereto are posted. *

* *

*Everyone should verify the accuracy of *

*the information provided for themselves *

*before acting on it. *

*******************************************

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++