Guest guest Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 All, Attached is a Press Release titled: " Federal Judge Considers Protecting Pregnant Women from Mercury-preserved Flu Shots (25 August 2009) in " pdf " format. If you need a " doc " document, then send an e-mail to me with " FJC-PPWFHg " in the title along with the reason for your request in the e-mail. For those not receiving attachments, the rough text of the CoMeD press release is: >Federal Judge Considers Protecting Pregnant >Women from Mercury-preserved Flu Shots > >PRESS RELEASE CONTACTS: >For Immed. Release CoMeD President [Rev. K. >August 25, 2009 Sykes (Richmond, VA) > ext. 113; E-mail: syklone5@...] > CoMeD Sci. Advisor [Dr. King (Lake > Hiawatha, NJ) ; E-mail: > drking@...] > >Washington, DC - In their lawsuit against the >defendants, the Secretary of Health and Human >Services (the Secretary) and Commissioner of >the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), >the Court has granted the Coalition for Mercury- >free Drugs (CoMeD, Inc.) plaintiffs a hearing >on their motion for a preliminary injunction to >stop pregnant women from being given mercury- >preserved flu shots. The Women's Division of >the United Methodist Church, Mothering Magazine >and individual people, from as far away as India, >have submitted sworn declarations in support of >CoMeD plaintiffs' lawsuit. > >Thimerosal (49.6-wt% mercury) is used as a >preservative in most flu shot doses (mercury- >preserved flu shots). It has been confirmed as >the preservative component for " preserved " or > " multi-dose " " swine flu " vaccine formulations. >Currently, Thimerosal-preserved flu shots may >legally be given to pregnant women in most >States. Pregnant women are presently one of the >primary targets for the upcoming " swine-flu " >campaign. In response to the CoMeD plaintiffs' >legal challenge, the FDA has, as of August 17, >2009, failed to produce the vaccine maker's >clinical and/or toxicological proofs that the >level of mercury contained in their Thimerosal- >preserved flu vaccine is safe to the required >standard, " sufficiently nontoxic so that the >amount present in the recommended dose of the >product will not be toxic to the recipient, " . [1] > > [1] This prerequisite is a minimum safety > requirement in the current good manu- > facturing practice (CGMP) regulations > set forth in 21 CFR § 610.15(a) for > preserved biological drug products that > the vaccine makers of preserved vaccines > are required to: a) meet, and submit > proof of safety to this CGMP minimum in > their Biological License Application (BLA) > (by 21 CFR § 601.2(a)) before the FDA can > legally approve the vaccine maker's BLA > (as per 21 CFR § 601.4, governing the > FDA's conduct with respect to proof of > safety and BLA approval). > >Based on statements by the producers of Thimerosal, >exposure in utero can produce fetal death, mild >to severe mental retardation, and impaired fer- >tility. According to the package inserts for all >inactivated-flu shots, the vaccines producers >have not proved their safety to pregnant women >and their unborn children. One government study >reviewed more than 50,000 pregnancy-outcome >instances and found links between both low-level >topical and single-vaccine-dose Thimerosal >exposures during pregnancy and significant >increased risks for serious birth defects (e.g., >cleft palate and microcephaly) in the child. >Many published toxicological papers and several >recent multi-case studies in children have >linked low-level Thimerosal exposure to adverse >developmental outcomes in children. > >The Court has granted the CoMeD plaintiffs a >hearing on their motion for a preliminary >injunction to prevent these injuries to the >next generation of our children. This >injunction asks the Court to stop: > # The vaccination of pregnant women with > any mercury-preserved flu vaccine, and > # The Secretary and the Centers for Disease > Control and Prevention (CDC) from recom- > mending the vaccination of pregnant women > with mercury-preserved flu shots. > >The Court has scheduled a hearing on the CoMeD >plaintiffs' motion on August 26, 2009. > Hopefully, the information provided will be helpful. Respectfully, Dr. King http://www.dr-king.com CoMeD Science Advisor. PS: Readers MAY want to also read the three (3) short articles posted in the " Documents " section of the CoMeD web site: http://www.Mercury-freeDrugs.org that were posted on 12 August 2009: > " The Rise of Diseases 'Caused' by >Sub-acute Hg Poisoning (12 August >2009; 9 pages) " > > " The 'Truth' About The Toxicity Of >Thimerosal (12 August 2009; 6 pages) " > > " The 'No Thimerosal-Preserved Vaccines' >Lie (12 August 2009; 9 pages) " ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.