Guest guest Posted July 10, 2009 Report Share Posted July 10, 2009 Vaccinated versus unvaccinated UNETHICAL We have been told for the past few decades that we can’t look at unvaccinated and vaccinated to see harmful effects at small levels from vaccines. It is unethical and can’t be done. This fall, the pregnant mothers will be vaccinated but not the unpregnant mothers. This will of course allow us to look at what happens to vaccinated mothers and their children compared to other mothers. Will the Government use this lack of enough vaccine to do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study? Did you see that pig fly across the sky? And another? And another? Swine “Flew” will give the USA government time to do this previously unethical study IF they want. But you will need real swine “flu” to do it. Will they be counting dead bodies too? Or will those be written out of the studies as is usual practice in all “safety” studies on new vaccines? To date a million live-born children, dead before age 5 with 11 out of 12 clinical signs of vaccine deaths have been written out of vaccine adverse effects over the past 40 years but we seem to have an excess of deaths from swine flu compared to England which has a similar number of cases but not a single death. Will there be a study on these 170 “dead” who have died from swine flu already or are these as spurious as denying justice for a million 0 to 5 year old infants? UNETHICAL Vaccinated versus unvaccinated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.