[CoMeD] Drft Revu of FDA's 'Thimerosal in Vaccines Q&A' webpage

[Guest guest]

All,

Attached is a draft of a review of the FDA's 'Thimerosal

in Vaccines Questions and Answers' webpage.

This document provides answers to the numerous obvious

misrepresentations made by the FDA in a doublespeak-

filled webpage that asks the wrong questions and then

fals to provide truthful answers to even its biased

questions.

Unfortunately, the document is too long and complex for

me to provide you a rough text of it.

If you get this e-mail but not the attachment,

after the middle of the month, you can download it

in " pdf " form from the CoMeD website:

http://www.mercury-freedrugs.com.

or, if your need is more immediate, please send me

a request for it at:

paulgkingphd@...

This copyrighted (by the author) document is being

freely distrubuted with the understanding that any

recipient agrees that he or she will not publish

any portion of it out of its context and that he

or she will credit the author, G. King, PhD,

and the authoring organization, CoMeD, Inc.

Please feel free to distribute this document to

your friends.

Also, PLEASE send a copy to each of your U.S.

Senators and your U.S. Congressman requesting

that he or she pursue the apparent " Data Quality

Act " violations in the FDA's original document

quoted w/o alteration, EXCEPT as noted, in the

text of this review and available at:

Hopefully, this review will help anyone who

carefully reads it to understand just how broken

the FDA is when it comes to, as the 2003

Congressional report 'Mercury In Medicine --

Taking Unnecessary Risks' found:

a. The failure of the manufacturers of Thimerosal-

preserved vaccines to comply with the recipient

safety requirement that each dose of a

Thimerosal-preserved vaccine MUST be proven

by the applicant/sponsor/manufacturer to be

" sufficiently nontoxic ... " , something that

ONLY toxicity studies can do, BEFORE filing for

a license for that Thimerosal-preserved

vaccine (21 CFR 620.15(a)),

b. The failure of the applicant/sponsor/manufac-

ture MUST submit that proof of safety in its

license application (21 CFR 601.2(a)), and

c. The FDA's failure to:

1. Enforce the law governing preservative

toxicity testing (21 CFR 610.15(a)),

2. Comply with the laws governing the

FDA's conduct (21 CFR 601.4(a)) when

it comes to the licensing of any vaccine

including a Thimerosal-preserved vaccine

when the makers thereof have failed to

provide proof that their Thimerosal-

preserved vaccines are " sufficiently

nontoxic ... " , a requirement from 1973

onwards, and

3. Protect all those people involved from

the first clinical onwards from being

UNNECESSARILY subacutely mercury-poisoned

by the Thimerosal, a known human teratogen,

mutagen, carcinogen and immune-system

disruptor at dose-levels below 1 ppm,

in the Thimerosal-preserved vaccines

where the manufacture of the vaccine have

NOT proven, and NOT been required to prove

the toxicological safety of the Thimerosal

being used as a preservative to the

standard " sufficiently nontoxic ... "

BEFORE any human can be injected with

that Thimerosal-preserved vaccine.

Respectfully,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++