Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Why Hep B vaccines for infants?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Why Hep B vaccines for infants? Why Hep B Vaccines at day one and for the first ten years or more of their usage complete with organomercury brain destroying toxins in an impure mix of ethyl and methyl compounds? Safe today, if unsafe ten years ago, except as yet, no one admits brain destroying chemicals are dangerous to the one day infant. No one except for EVERY chemist that believes in the PROPERTY OF MATTER. Evidently NO medical Doctor seems to be a chemist with apologies to those who have brains still working. A significant number of ADULT medical workers REFUSE even ONE Hep B injection despite it being considered NECESSARY to practise as a medical worker today. Now that’s SENSIBLE! This means per se, a significant number of doctors are administering these injections to infants while not practising the same disease prevention strategy themselves. In that oft quoted remark. WE ARE/WERE JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS. Hepatitis B is not a nice disease to get and the aim of the vaccine to get rid of this salopery is a fine aim. But the idea of giving an organomercury vaccine to an infant as soon as they are born and then repeat this toxic insult twice more before the infant is four months of age and still at least to the eye an extremely fragile and vulnerable being is STUPID. It actually makes a healthy child less healthy. When they (Well Visit nurses and doctors) fail to do simple before and after checks like measuring to see, as does happen, the head blows up to twice its size is STARTLING. Naturally the incidence of this illness has descended post vaccinations and it is a mute point to say if the vaccine played a role or better hygiene and nursing care. The Hep B figures for this illness in USA are hard to find and even harder to get reliable figures. There is even hint of them being massaged or ‘quality reviewed’. On the good side, from some sources, 9 out of 10 who get the illness recover and are protected for life. This disagrees with some other claims that 9 out of 10 go on to die from liver cancer. 73 000 new cases each year in 2009 USA according to some figures would imply that the numbers are less than when vaccines commenced by a factor of three to four fold. Looking at a white person’s risk before the vaccines commenced for one day babies there was a 1 in 100 000 risk for this population in USA again from some sources and in this case CDC. This means that you are giving 99 999 vaccines to white children that just DON’T need that vaccine at this age. Looking at SIDS running at 0.5 to 1.5 deaths per 1 000 you might be killing 150 + babies each time you give this vaccine in order to prevent one person becoming infected at birth or in life and with some quotes of a 90 per cent complete recovery with FULL lifetime protection. 3 lots of injections by 4 months might leave a death trail of nearly 500 + USA children for that one tenth of a person that might get the disease and rest chronically ill but still leading a life of perhaps 70 plus years in goodish but could be better health. I think the idea of a sledge hammer to crack a nut looks relevant. But exactly who or what is the NUT? We have in association with DEATH, a rate of ten times as many walking wounded. So along with the 500 dead by 4 months comes an estimated 5 000 neurologically or otherwise affected USA children. On top of all this is the fact that vaccine type fragments turn up in the Hep B cases showing the infection does not come from anywhere but past Hep B vaccinations gone wrong. Gone wrong on top of the 500 dead and 5 000 neurological cases. The CDC can supply more on the proliferation of illness direct from vaccines and Hep B in this case. Let’s take a closer look at the one tenth person who didn’t make a full recovery with life time protection. That’s one person who may get Hep B at birth or later. Look at the birth case. An infected mother gives birth to a child. Before you give or miss giving the Hep B vaccine there are ISSUES. We have full testing for infection and for the natural antibody protection. Strange but 9 out of 10 of those UNCLEAN will have recovered and give their child IMMUNE PROTECTION, natural and long lasting for this illness. So why the vaccine for this group? Disease is often SELF LIMITING and with good hygiene a huge reduction can be achieved especially as the pathways of infection are relatively clear and unambiguous. If the mother is infected while pregnant, then special practices can ensure the risk of infection is REDUCED for the infant. In a world where forced medication is practised such as fluoride in our water or compulsory vaccines it might be thought that recovery from the Hep B might proceed the birth; We do have abortion on demand in USA almost at a whim and running at numbers so high no one wants to publicise them but lets give a figure of 1 child KILLED out of 3 by doctors before it gets a chance to breath FRESH air. Assuming now the worst and the child is born to an infected mother and is suffering from Hep B will a vaccine actually work? So why the vaccine for this group? Surely the deed is done. How does a vaccine prevent infection already rampant? 99 999 vaccines given at day one not appropriate as NO RISK to infant and now we have the one case where there is INFECTION but it’s now too late for a vaccine. So why the vaccine for this group? Why therefore do we give the vaccine? To kill 500 babies each year? To have 5000 babies with long term neurological illness? To mothers who pass on lifetime Hep B protection to their child? To Hep B mothers who give birth to a child at birth with rampant Hep B? In this case possibly to add a bit of extra man made GMO bits of Hep B to an infant already complete with millions of Hep B virus in the hope that you might make a new strain more infectious, more dangerous and possibly of use to the MILITARY? The only thing likely to help this child is: Good and conscientious nursing and delivery. Use of protective globulin which will help fight and destroy the illness and not add to the childs problems. A vaccine theoretically is for protection from illness and is absolutely counter indicated if you have the illness. Why Hep B Vaccines at day one and for the first ten years or more of their usage complete with organomercury brain destroying toxins in an impure mix of ethyl and methyl compounds ? Why Hep B vaccines for infants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...