Wiznitzer versus Olmsted

[Guest guest]

Wiznitzer versus Olmsted There seems to be the issue of lies, damned lies, and more damned lies. The study done on the Amish community found that autism did not exist except with rare exceptions where it was found the people had been vaccinated before coming to the Amish Community. This statement from Olmsted was so long ago that it can easily have been checked and disproved which it most certainly has not to my knowledge and Wiznitzer in contrast implies that the Amish do however STRONGLY vaccinate their children and do indeed NOT get autistic symptoms completely in agreement with Olmsted. Whatever else; there does seem consensus that Amish people do not become autistic but there is dissent on whether they are vaccinated. The only way out of this impasse is for someone to study the group of Amish that Wiznitzer says are vaccinated and see if he is telling the truth. We all know what government statements mean when they come out with no mercury in vaccines after 1999. Its sheer PROPAGANDA. I was under the impression that they (Amish communities) were more likely to suffer from nervous type complaints because of a true genetic weakness they have, so in any event the lack of autism claimed by all sides of this argument is to me totally incredible and almost unbelievable. The work of Olmsted was a pivotal analysis of autism AND ITS CAUSE that to my knowledge has not been dismissed except by innuendo. Wiznitzer does put his head on the chopping block when he talks of autistic children ACTUALLY becoming less autistic as they get older! Imagine the scenario this means. Age half a day passed as FIT AND HEALTHY by the APGAR score and then in the words of the infant gets hit by a bus. The head inflates to enormous size often unoticed until the next ‘Well Centre’ visit 8 weeks later where the child then gets hit by 5 buses. Again a few weeks later another 5 buses hit this child. If they survive all this, which mysteriously they often do, then at age 1 year another bus comes along and often this is the beginning of the end for the child. They REGRESS and lose their ability to talk, walk and perform normal bodily functions in the normal way. But as Max tells us and proves, there is SOME RECOVERY generally in the short term by the right treatment as per or in the long term by the ‘time mends all’ philosphy of Max. Any later vaccines are to a much heavier stronger person so this recovery fits easily into a vaccine – too soon, too many, and not the milk that is the life blood for the child scenario. The question must be asked what explanation is there for a healthy to ill to healthy ROLLER COASTER ride for the health of USA children? And what is different for children that takes them at age 1 day to illness and then a long road to some recovery? Is it the ‘rocket fuel’ in the cows milk that is causing it? Or could it be the 100 or so bits of animal parts, GMO organisms, pathogenic dead and live organisms, toxic metals, organophosphates (insecticide) et al that has been proved since time immemorial to be capable of downing a full grown elephant let alone the fragile, still unformed body of an infant? Its a difficult shot to answer but for me the last time I got an injections was 40 years ago and it may have altered my mental ability to get the above exactly right. But with 50 or so by the age of four I am sure I would truly be in another WORLD. Wiznitzer versus Olmsted