Where We Stand - A Call for Change

[Guest guest]

Where We Stand - A Call for ChangeOkay, so here we are - the government (as far as I know) has decided notone, but *all three* autism omnibus cases at once. According to Kirby(http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/02/vaccine-court-to-weigh-in-on-

thursday.html) there are also interesting questions surrounding thetiming of announcing these verdicts - it is possibly significant thatthese verdicts are coming at about the same time as the findings againstWakefield over in Britain.What are we to make of this? I'm not sure. Even if the cases decidedwere not specifically about thimerosal ("The Mercury Theory") or MMR("The MMR Theory"), they are both about vaccines. The Wakefield casepertains to the MMR Theory, but to the Mercury Theory. Of course, thegovernment have already tried to discredit individual links to bothmercury and MMR in "many scientific" papers - to no real avail. Theyare still scared and "vaccine uptake rates" are dropping - and they havenever to my knowledge released their own rebuttal to claims by "ourside" of methodological errors on their part.So, by releasing the US verdicts almost simultaneous with the Wakefielddecision, is the HHS trying not just to bury both theories of causation,but to bury a link to vaccines *at all*? Anyone who has been readingthe recent (and even *not so recent* papers) knows that theautism-vaccine debate has moved beyond *just* mercury, or even justMMR. It has moved to over-stimulation of the immune system in general,un-natural TH1/TH2 skewing of the system, un-natural activation of theneural immune system and glial cell disruption, the neurotoxic andimmunologic effects of aluminum and possibly other toxins - both in *theenvironment* and vaccines.*Especially* environmental effects which have *nothing* to do withvaccines - except perhaps making infants more vulnerable to theimmunological onslaught. See(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6W81-4VK6N5N-

3 & _user=10 & _coverDate=02%2F10%2F2009 & _rdoc=1 & _fmt= & _orig=search & _sort=d &

view=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVersion=0 & _userid=10 & md5=

7472c7a767898a930d3a5e85749045f3) and(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338635) and(http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/04/olmsted-on-auti.html). Hmm.. Ipersonally want to see someone in a Congressional hot-seat and get tothe bottom of what was or was not said by whom and when (and who elsemight have known it).There is also the nature of the three autism cases themselves. The HHShas publicly "concluded" that vaccines do not cause (or "have any rolein causing") *autism* (or, as I prefer, "mitochondrial and/orimmunological failure leading to widespread metabolic collapse"). Weall knew that was a likely outcome, even though we hoped it wouldn'thappen. They did concede the Poling case, but they did not concludethat vaccines caused her *autism* - only that vaccines exascerbated orotherwise turned an existing mitocondrial defect, when then causedautism. And then concluded that this is "rare". But does ANYONE reallyknow how rare this is? I don't think so, given that we don't even know*how* otherwise non-symptomatic mitochondrial problems can turn intoautism).But in the Cedillo case, she not only has autism, but alsoepilepsy. Epilepsy, unlike autism, I believe is a *recognized* vaccinereaction. So, is she being quietly compensated for that, out of sightof the media? If they have not, one might even conclude that the HHS issaying - implicitly or explicitly - not just that vaccines have nothingto do with *autism*, but also they have no role in *any other adversereactions* (such as epilepsy).If that is what they are saying, it is *much* more serious, as we allknow that "autism" is just the tip of the (probable) vaccine-injuryiceberg - and the government knows it too. The rest of the iceberg isat least some proportion of juvenile-onet diabetes (type 1 certainly,possibly type 2 as well), juvenile RA, juvenile MS (the mind shudders atthe possibility - I though MS only affected "old" people..), autoimmunehypothyroidism, other autoimmune conditions including alopecia,epilepsy, possibly other psychiatric conditions, and of course asthmaand allergies - sometimes life-threatening.I find it interesting as well that they are releasing judgement on *allthree* cases at once. Instead of "closing the window" a little, theyappear to be slamming it shut. Case closed, end of story. And buryyour head in the sand about the coming 'autism tsunami' - which may makecurrent financial crisis look like a gentle breeze over a pond.Sorry for being so long-winded - I just have questions - as do weall. Now to the 'change' part. If my conclusions above are a fairassesment of the government's position, they have pretty much decidedalready declared that vaccines DO NOT CAUSE ANY HARM WHATSOEVER (sorryfor shouting - I just get rather excited sometimes (just like Mr.Heckenlively, Esq.http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/04/the-ever-excita.html). If so, thereshould be no harm in opening the VSD database, should there? After all,if there actually IS no link, then we won't be able to find it - and anystudy we come up with that says we have should be easy to refute..There are other questions as well, raised by Kirby in Evidence ofHarm, that I feel *really* need answers. Such as: What exactly *is*"Task Order 74" - *one* page that the is apparently "Un-FOIA-able" forsome reason? Why were parts of the VSD database sold or otherwise lost- in apparent *violation of Federal law*? Of course, all of thesequestions and more can be found in the "Questions for the Future"section at the end of EoH.I for one want these questions answered - as do thousands of otherparents. *Especially* the one about the above-mentioned anecdotalcomment by Mike Leavitt. President Obama publicly said he wanted to"change" the way Washington worked - indeed, that is likely what got himelected. This notwithstanding the fact that his campaign apparentlyswam - or drown (depending on your perspective) - in money from "BigPharma", he has stated repeated that he wants change within the Beltway.*I* want change. Thousands of other people want change.I will digress from autism into the larger health-care debate here -only because I feel it is important not only to the future of autismtreatment, but also the treatment of everything else: If autism hastaught us nothing, it is that our pollution of our environment WILL (andhas) come back to haunt us, that *everything* is related, and that weunderstand VERY little about how our bodies really work. Seehttp://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v41/n2/abs/ng.298.html for an exampleof a how a new result can drastically call into question and expand along-standing "though-we-understood-it-all" concept in biology. In thiscase, it is the methylation of DNA in so-called CpG islands altering DNAfunction. Recently it has been shown that methylation in parts of DNAthat are far distant from such "CpG islands" that appears to have a rolein cancer. The point is that things change, new things are discovered,and very little in biology is sacred, and almost nothing can be said tobe at a state of "we know everything". Certainly not when it comes tosomething as complicated as the immune system(http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/howms.html#Causes - search for 'size ofLondon')We want a health system (notice I did not say "health-*care*") thattakes these important facts into account. We want a health system thatdoes not track everything we do, does not take away doctors' [sic]freedom to make decisions based on individual patient needs andsituation (so much as they actually exercise it now), and does notincrease our dependence on drug companies. We want a health system thatencourages research, innovation, and taking steps to *reduce* disease,rather than to simply "treat" it.Personally - and I know I speak for hundreds or thousands of others insaying this - I want *real*, publicly funded and completely openrigorous studies into the use of low-dose naltrexone for multiplesclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's, and other autoimmune diseases- and yes, autism. I want studies into the role of vitamins andsupplements in many diseases that our DAN doctors and others arediscovering - not just the too-small RDA values that may or may not besufficient for humans given our very toxic environment. A recentlyreleased study found that vitamin E did not in fact prevent cancer. Myfirst question upon reading that was, "*which* vitamin E? Alpha orGamma?" Gamma form vitamin E is the one found primarily in foods, and Ibelieve is generally better for the body than the alpha form - which isprimarily used in supplements. Gamma form E is also found to bedepleted in the brains of Alzheimer's patients - but NOT the alpha form,and is thought to be a major anti-inflammatory agent in the disorder(http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/81/2/508). If there is adifference between the two forms in regard to cancer risk and/orprevention - this study was at least incomplete and at worstinvalid. But how many other people asked that? Almost no-one, I'msure.And we all want studies on the treatments that Bernie Rimland (bless hisheart) and his organization the ARI, have researched for the past 60years. The failure of our government (or indeed, *any* government to myknowledge) to act on these is a stain that I hope will be rememberedwith utter shame by future medical histories.And then there are the recent reports that the FDA has classified thep5p form of B6 as a drug (http://www.naturalnews.com/025606.html andhttp://aahf.nonprofitsoapbox.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view &

id=677 & Itemid=). Here is a copy of the complaint petition against theFDA filed in 2005(http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/dockets/05p0305/05p-0305-rc00002-01-

vol1.pdf) and the recent FDA response(http://www.naturalproductsassoc.org/site/DocServer/FDA_Response.pdf?

docID=9001). Such a decision will possibly give the FDA the legalpower to go after any supplement manufacturer they choose to who usesp5p in one of their products. Can anyone come up with any more"reputable" source - meaning one that ANYONE will believe - not that I'dever expect this to show up on MSNBC or the like.If this is true, I personally consider it something akin to adeclaration of war upon parents pursuing "fringe" treatment of theirautistic kids everywhere. Parents who are working and researching andsearching for answers - that NO ONE else is apparently looking for - seeabove. All this in the hope that their kids might one day again (atleast in the case of regressive autism, which most seems to be) be ableto become functional, contributing members of society and lead happy andFULL lives. This includes *normal* social and emotional cognition of"the other" 70-95% of humanity out there.But most of all, we want *transparency* from our health system and ourgovernment. The government has made a bold statement in recent daysabout their non-belief in the vaccine-autism hypothesis. If they areright, they have NOTHING to fear from opening their precious databanksfor all to see - and getting to the bottom of what Mike Leavitt said ordidn't say. As many have said, sunshine is the best cure for manythings (the vitamin D pun noted).*I* cannot do this. Perhaps there are those reading this who can (theoriginal "DC 7" come to mind). Congress *can*. Obama *can* - byexecutive order if necessary, overriding those in Congress who wouldrather keep things in the dark rather than the light of day.These actions would will almost certainly not be politically popular -at least with some - and may even cost some people their next electionbids. But to paraphrase the author J.K. Rowling, from Harry Potter andthe Goblet of Fire (odd choice I know):To and all of Congress, and President Obama:"I tell you now - take the steps I have suggested, and you will beremembered, in office or out, as one of the bravest and greatest[leaders] we have ever known. Fail to act - and history will rememberyou as the man who stepped aside..".. remember you as the man stepped aside.. just like his predecessorsdid, did nothing or little of substance, and allowed one of the greatestmedical tragedies of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries tocontinue. Un-abated, un-checked (in all probability), un-researched (inmeaningful ways), and most of all un-treated.God speed to all in positions to effect *real* change.--Jim Witte ("Warrior Aspie") has self-diagnosed"Asperger's-like-symptoms", multiple autoimmunities, as well as clinicaldepression for 10 years which mysteriously almost completely disappearedwith oxytocin treatment. He is currently interested in the possiblerole of oxytocin in the rehabilitation of Asperger's disorder incombination with other anecdotally proven treatments.

[Guest guest]

Dear Jim,I think this piece is excellent. With respect to vitamin E, I would refer you to Dr. Sherry . She says that cheap, synthetic E (d,l-alpha-tocopherol) actually works against any natural vitamin E you might get from your diet. It becomes a negative. Real vitamin E (shown to retard the progression of arteriosclerosis) is not one thing: it is 4 tocopherols and 4 tocotrienols, so be sure you take real vitamin E with all 8 parts. The vitamin E studies that showed no health impact were conducted with synthetic vitamin E (d,l-alpha-tocopherol) or with vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol.It takes 3-6 months to restore vitamin E. recommends E-Gems Elite by Carlson. I've tried to explain this

to my husband's cardiologist and get the recording about "supplements unregulated and blah blah yadda yadda.."Hope this is useful.To: ABMD <abmd >Cc: EOHarm <EOHarm >Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:41:45 PMSubject: Where We Stand - A Call for Change

Where We Stand - A Call for ChangeOkay, so here we are - the government (as far as I know) has decided notone, but *all three* autism omnibus cases at once. According to Kirby(http://www.ageofaut ism.com/2009/ 02/vaccine- court-to- weigh-in- on-

thursday.html) there are also interesting questions surrounding thetiming of announcing these verdicts - it is possibly significant thatthese verdicts are coming at about the same time as the findings againstWakefield over in Britain.What are we to make of this? I'm not sure. Even if the cases decidedwere not specifically about thimerosal ("The Mercury Theory") or MMR("The MMR Theory"), they are both about vaccines. The Wakefield casepertains to the MMR Theory, but to the Mercury Theory. Of course, thegovernment have already tried to discredit individual links to bothmercury and MMR in "many scientific" papers - to no real avail. Theyare still scared and "vaccine uptake rates" are dropping - and they havenever to my knowledge released their own rebuttal to claims by

"ourside" of methodological errors on their part.So, by releasing the US verdicts almost simultaneous with the Wakefielddecision, is the HHS trying not just to bury both theories of causation,but to bury a link to vaccines *at all*? Anyone who has been readingthe recent (and even *not so recent* papers) knows that theautism-vaccine debate has moved beyond *just* mercury, or even justMMR. It has moved to over-stimulation of the immune system in general,un-natural TH1/TH2 skewing of the system, un-natural activation of theneural immune system and glial cell disruption, the neurotoxic andimmunologic effects of aluminum and possibly other toxins - both in *theenvironment* and vaccines.*Especially* environmental effects which have *nothing* to do withvaccines - except perhaps

making infants more vulnerable to theimmunological onslaught. See(http://www.scienced irect.com/ science?_ ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6W81-4VK6N5N-

3 & _user=10 & _coverDate=02% 2F10%2F2009 & _rdoc=1 & _fmt= & _orig=search & _sort=d &

view=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVersion= 0 & _userid=10 & md5=

7472c7a767898a930d3 a5e85749045f3) and(http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/16338635) and(http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/17894204? ordinalpos= 1 & itool=

EntrezSystem2. PEntrez.Pubmed. Pubmed_ResultsPa nel.Pubmed_ DiscoveryPanel.

Pubmed_Discovery_ RA & linkpos=5 & log$=relatedreviews & logdbfrom=pubmed)Does the government have any real answers, or (more to *their* point)refutations for the "immunological over-stimulation" theory ofautism? I don't know - but I doubt it. The government might be forcednot only to admit something they don't want to, but the entire medicalprofession would have to admit that they have been playing with firewith vaccines. Playing with fire because we barely understand how 97%(or more) of the immune system works. Not to mention it's incrediblyand almost entirely not-understood connections with the nervous,endocrine, and digestive systems of the body (are they even separatesystems at all?).For a while it seemed we didn't seem to get burned - back when therewere

only around 3 or 4 vaccinated-against diseases. Now there about14, with multiple strains of each, and multiple shots (with multipledoses of alum), totaling around 30 or more shots before the age of2. This is to say nothing of multiple live-viruse vaccines, "viralinterference" , vitamin A and other nutrient depletion, depletion whichis possibly genetically influenced.Given the scientific knowledge of nutrient usage by the immune systemand other systems (detoxification pathways, methylation cycles,mitochondrial function, etc..), the lack of supplementation of vitamin Aand other nutrient surrounding vaccination seems a *huge* oversight. Toremedy this would be to use a "peri-vaccination" supplementationprogram, a protocol which has already been developed by DAN Dr. Buckley and her

associates down in Florida. Vitamin A supplementationrumored to even be in the *WHO Guidelines* for MMR vaccinationthemselves. Do you know any peds who routinely do this? I would betthe answer is no - and that the AAP has not said a thing that I knowof.. Hmm - the WHO itself says something, and the AAP isn't followingsuit? Can anyone say "Crimes Against Humanity" and "The Hague"? (Yeah,I know, it's a nice dream..)And then there is the curious anecdote about former HHS secretary MikeLeavitt saying in passing, "we know it's the mercury"(http://www.ageofaut ism.com/2008/ 04/olmsted- on-auti.html). Hmm.. Ipersonally want to see someone in a Congressional hot-seat and get tothe

bottom of what was or was not said by whom and when (and who elsemight have known it).There is also the nature of the three autism cases themselves. The HHShas publicly "concluded" that vaccines do not cause (or "have any rolein causing") *autism* (or, as I prefer, "mitochondrial and/orimmunological failure leading to widespread metabolic collapse"). Weall knew that was a likely outcome, even though we hoped it wouldn'thappen. They did concede the Poling case, but they did not concludethat vaccines caused her *autism* - only that vaccines exascerbated orotherwise turned an existing mitocondrial defect, when then causedautism. And then concluded that this is "rare". But does ANYONE reallyknow how rare this is? I don't think so, given that we don't even know*how* otherwise

non-symptomatic mitochondrial problems can turn intoautism).But in the Cedillo case, she not only has autism, but alsoepilepsy. Epilepsy, unlike autism, I believe is a *recognized* vaccinereaction. So, is she being quietly compensated for that, out of sightof the media? If they have not, one might even conclude that the HHS issaying - implicitly or explicitly - not just that vaccines have nothingto do with *autism*, but also they have no role in *any other adversereactions* (such as epilepsy).If that is what they are saying, it is *much* more serious, as we allknow that "autism" is just the tip of the (probable) vaccine-injuryiceberg - and the government knows it too. The rest of the iceberg isat least some proportion of juvenile-onet diabetes (type 1

certainly,possibly type 2 as well), juvenile RA, juvenile MS (the mind shudders atthe possibility - I though MS only affected "old" people..), autoimmunehypothyroidism, other autoimmune conditions including alopecia,epilepsy, possibly other psychiatric conditions, and of course asthmaand allergies - sometimes life-threatening.I find it interesting as well that they are releasing judgement on *allthree* cases at once. Instead of "closing the window" a little, theyappear to be slamming it shut. Case closed, end of story. And buryyour head in the sand about the coming 'autism tsunami' - which may makecurrent financial crisis look like a gentle breeze over a pond.Sorry for being so long-winded - I just have questions - as do weall. Now to the 'change' part. If my

conclusions above are a fairassesment of the government's position, they have pretty much decidedalready declared that vaccines DO NOT CAUSE ANY HARM WHATSOEVER (sorryfor shouting - I just get rather excited sometimes (just like Mr.Heckenlively, Esq.http://www.ageofaut ism.com/2008/ 04/the-ever- excita.html). If so, thereshould be no harm in opening the VSD database, should there? After all,if there actually IS no link, then we won't be able to find it - and anystudy we come up with that says we have should be easy to refute..There are other questions as well, raised by Kirby in Evidence ofHarm, that I feel *really* need answers. Such as: What exactly *is*"Task Order 74" - *one* page that the is

apparently "Un-FOIA-able" forsome reason? Why were parts of the VSD database sold or otherwise lost- in apparent *violation of Federal law*? Of course, all of thesequestions and more can be found in the "Questions for the Future"section at the end of EoH.I for one want these questions answered - as do thousands of otherparents. *Especially* the one about the above-mentioned anecdotalcomment by Mike Leavitt. President Obama publicly said he wanted to"change" the way Washington worked - indeed, that is likely what got himelected. This notwithstanding the fact that his campaign apparentlyswam - or drown (depending on your perspective) - in money from "BigPharma", he has stated repeated that he wants change within the Beltway.*I* want change. Thousands of other people want

change.I will digress from autism into the larger health-care debate here -only because I feel it is important not only to the future of autismtreatment, but also the treatment of everything else: If autism hastaught us nothing, it is that our pollution of our environment WILL (andhas) come back to haunt us, that *everything* is related, and that weunderstand VERY little about how our bodies really work. Seehttp://www.nature. com/ng/journal/ v41/n2/abs/ ng.298.html for an exampleof a how a new result can drastically call into question and expand along-standing "though-we-understo od-it-all" concept in biology. In thiscase, it is the methylation of DNA in so-called CpG islands altering DNAfunction.

Recently it has been shown that methylation in parts of DNAthat are far distant from such "CpG islands" that appears to have a rolein cancer. The point is that things change, new things are discovered,and very little in biology is sacred, and almost nothing can be said tobe at a state of "we know everything". Certainly not when it comes tosomething as complicated as the immune system(http://www.mult- sclerosis. org/howms. html#Causes - search for 'size ofLondon')We want a health system (notice I did not say "health-*care* ") thattakes these important facts into account. We want a health system thatdoes not track everything we do, does not take away doctors' [sic]freedom to make decisions based on

individual patient needs andsituation (so much as they actually exercise it now), and does notincrease our dependence on drug companies. We want a health system thatencourages research, innovation, and taking steps to *reduce* disease,rather than to simply "treat" it.Personally - and I know I speak for hundreds or thousands of others insaying this - I want *real*, publicly funded and completely openrigorous studies into the use of low-dose naltrexone for multiplesclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's, and other autoimmune diseases- and yes, autism. I want studies into the role of vitamins andsupplements in many diseases that our DAN doctors and others arediscovering - not just the too-small RDA values that may or may not besufficient for humans given our very toxic environment. A

recentlyreleased study found that vitamin E did not in fact prevent cancer. Myfirst question upon reading that was, "*which* vitamin E? Alpha orGamma?" Gamma form vitamin E is the one found primarily in foods, and Ibelieve is generally better for the body than the alpha form - which isprimarily used in supplements. Gamma form E is also found to bedepleted in the brains of Alzheimer's patients - but NOT the alpha form,and is thought to be a major anti-inflammatory agent in the disorder(http://www.ajcn. org/cgi/content/ abstract/ 81/2/508). If there is adifference between the two forms in regard to cancer risk and/orprevention - this study was at least incomplete and at worstinvalid. But how many other

people asked that? Almost no-one, I'msure.And we all want studies on the treatments that Bernie Rimland (bless hisheart) and his organization the ARI, have researched for the past 60years. The failure of our government (or indeed, *any* government to myknowledge) to act on these is a stain that I hope will be rememberedwith utter shame by future medical histories.And then there are the recent reports that the FDA has classified thep5p form of B6 as a drug (http://www.naturaln ews.com/025606. html andhttp://aahf. nonprofitsoapbox .com/index. php?option= com_content & task=view &

id=677 & Itemid=). Here is a copy of the complaint petition against theFDA filed in 2005(http://www.fda. gov/OHRMS/ DOCKETS/dockets/ 05p0305/05p- 0305-rc00002- 01-

vol1.pdf) and the recent FDA response(http://www.naturalp roductsassoc. org/site/ DocServer/ FDA_Response. pdf?

docID=9001). Such a decision will possibly give the FDA the legalpower to go after any supplement manufacturer they choose to who usesp5p in one of their products. Can anyone come up with any more"reputable" source - meaning one that ANYONE will believe - not that I'dever expect this to show up on MSNBC or the like.If this is true, I personally consider it something akin to adeclaration of war upon parents pursuing "fringe" treatment of theirautistic kids everywhere. Parents who are working and researching andsearching for answers - that NO ONE else is apparently looking for - seeabove. All this in the hope that their kids might one day again (atleast in the case of regressive autism, which most seems to be) be ableto become functional, contributing members of society and

lead happy andFULL lives. This includes *normal* social and emotional cognition of"the other" 70-95% of humanity out there.But most of all, we want *transparency* from our health system and ourgovernment. The government has made a bold statement in recent daysabout their non-belief in the vaccine-autism hypothesis. If they areright, they have NOTHING to fear from opening their precious databanksfor all to see - and getting to the bottom of what Mike Leavitt said ordidn't say. As many have said, sunshine is the best cure for manythings (the vitamin D pun noted).*I* cannot do this. Perhaps there are those reading this who can (theoriginal "DC 7" come to mind). Congress *can*. Obama *can* - byexecutive order if necessary, overriding those in Congress who

wouldrather keep things in the dark rather than the light of day.These actions would will almost certainly not be politically popular -at least with some - and may even cost some people their next electionbids. But to paraphrase the author J.K. Rowling, from Harry Potter andthe Goblet of Fire (odd choice I know):To and all of Congress, and President Obama:"I tell you now - take the steps I have suggested, and you will beremembered, in office or out, as one of the bravest and greatest[leaders] we have ever known. Fail to act - and history will rememberyou as the man who stepped aside..".. remember you as the man stepped aside.. just like his predecessorsdid, did nothing or little of substance, and allowed one of the greatestmedical

tragedies of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries tocontinue. Un-abated, un-checked (in all probability) , un-researched (inmeaningful ways), and most of all un-treated.God speed to all in positions to effect *real* change.--Jim Witte ("Warrior Aspie") has self-diagnosed"Asperger's- like-symptoms" , multiple autoimmunities, as well as clinicaldepression for 10 years which mysteriously almost completely disappearedwith oxytocin treatment. He is currently interested in the possiblerole of oxytocin in the rehabilitation of Asperger's disorder incombination with other anecdotally proven treatments.

[Guest guest]

and all, I actually thought that the Special Masters purposely weighted to reveal their decisions at the same time with Wakefield. This gave the 'powers that be' huge media coverage that imply vaccines are safe. These announcements come at a perfect time with the stimulus bill that Obama is about to sign in Denver. As we know here, there are provisions to increase our vaccination program.

**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=febemailfooterNO62)