Guest guest Posted October 18, 2008 Report Share Posted October 18, 2008 One thing I think it is important to remember in this election is that candidates may say anything in the off-the-cuff moment ( and possibly even with honest conviction and belief) and yet this may well not translate into policy. Every acts as the the President is the most powerful person in the free world, and yet in reality Congress can stymie him/her at every single turn if they choose, and the Court can likewise toss out whateve they choose with little repercussions (who can you appeal to if the Supreme Court makes a bad decision?) There are very, very few politicians who believe so strongly in their convictions that they will place their career on the line. People who have that inner strength of conviction rarely make it to higher office because they are unwilling to compromise their principles. So much of the arguments on any single topic become more academic than anything else. If we are to achieve improvements in our niche of society (one example: services for autism) we are probaly going to have to fight the battle in our hometown elections, starting with the House. Congressmen are (re)elected every single year, and if we can toss out a handful of incumbants and force the newbies to vote consistantly to help our children, we will achieve far more than trying for the gold ring of a Preidential candidate who not only understands our plight but believes in helping us. That is unless Burton tosses his hat in the ring in '12. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2008 Report Share Posted October 18, 2008 About the Schmuck vaccine injury case....... also know that 's chelation doc was our first chelation doc. That doc has a child of his own with autism (she is now very high functioning and 14 years old). I'm telling you, McCain (even as a lowly senator) was probably doing as Dave Weldon, putting his reputation on the line for the sake of our kids. From the legislators (Rep) I see in my own chelation doc's office, there are more pro-environment, anti-pharma Republicans floating around out there. In AZ, it was the Republicans who helped pass the autism insurance legislation. From: Dad Fourkids <dad_4_kidsyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Friday, October 17, 2008, 3:11 PM One thing I think it is important to remember in this election is that candidates may say anything in the off-the-cuff moment ( and possibly even with honest conviction and belief) and yet this may well not translate into policy. Every acts as the the President is the most powerful person in the free world, and yet in reality Congress can stymie him/her at every single turn if they choose, and the Court can likewise toss out whateve they choose with little repercussions (who can you appeal to if the Supreme Court makes a bad decision?)There are very, very few politicians who believe so strongly in their convictions that they will place their career on the line. People who have that inner strength of conviction rarely make it to higher office because they are unwilling to compromise their principles.So much of the arguments on any single topic become more academic than anything else. If we are to achieve improvements in our niche of society (one example: services for autism) we are probaly going to have to fight the battle in our hometown elections, starting with the House. Congressmen are (re)elected every single year, and if we can toss out a handful of incumbants and force the newbies to vote consistantly to help our children, we will achieve far more than trying for the gold ring of a Preidential candidate who not only understands our plight but believes in helping us.That is unless Burton tosses his hat in the ring in '12. ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2008 Report Share Posted October 18, 2008 Good point. There were some key Republicans in NY that helped get both the thimerosal and insurance bills passed. It was a truly bipartisan effort - because in NY the Assembly is controlled by the Democrats and the Senate is controlled by the Republicans. And at that time the Republican governor, Gov. Pataki, signed the bills into law.The lesson is that our issues cut across party lines and we must take a bipartisan or multipartisan approach.About the Schmuck vaccine injury case....... also know that 's chelation doc was our first chelation doc. That doc has a child of his own with autism (she is now very high functioning and 14 years old). I'm telling you, McCain (even as a lowly senator) was probably doing as Dave Weldon, putting his reputation on the line for the sake of our kids. From the legislators (Rep) I see in my own chelation doc's office, there are more pro-environment, anti-pharma Republicans floating around out there. In AZ, it was the Republicans who helped pass the autism insurance legislation.From: Dad Fourkids <dad_4_kidsyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Friday, October 17, 2008, 3:11 PMOne thing I think it is important to remember in this election is that candidates may say anything in the off-the-cuff moment ( and possibly even with honest conviction and belief) and yet this may well not translate into policy. Every acts as the the President is the most powerful person in the free world, and yet in reality Congress can stymie him/her at every single turn if they choose, and the Court can likewise toss out whateve they choose with little repercussions (who can you appeal to if the Supreme Court makes a bad decision?)There are very, very few politicians who believe so strongly in their convictions that they will place their career on the line. People who have that inner strength of conviction rarely make it to higher office because they are unwilling to compromise their principles.So much of the arguments on any single topic become more academic than anything else. If we are to achieve improvements in our niche of society (one example: services for autism) we are probaly going to have to fight the battle in our hometown elections, starting with the House. Congressmen are (re)elected every single year, and if we can toss out a handful of incumbants and force the newbies to vote consistantly to help our children, we will achieve far more than trying for the gold ring of a Preidential candidate who not only understands our plight but believes in helping us.That is unless Burton tosses his hat in the ring in '12. ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 > I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for... Me too. But I can't help but hope that McCain will press for a total reform of the FDA, NIH, CDC and all the health orgs that no longer work for the people and instead act as thinly veiled agents for big pharma. This isn't being said on the campaign trail as it's too touchy for sure with all the pharma money and influence out there - but it should be openly addressed by both candidates. Doesn't HEALTHCARE SPENDING automatically get reduced when the FDA is doing its job and keeping crappy, ineffective, harmful drugs off the market? To reduce wasteful spending on drugs that don't work at best and harm at worst is a no brainer policy to pursue - plenty of examples to cite - vioxx just being one. Really hate tho that McCain's so hell bent on nuclear energy proliferation - last I read about it, the radiative waste had a 40,000 year half-life or something insanely long like that. IMO, ain't responsible to be putting that hazzard out there for the next hump-teen generations. I know, I know, mercury emissions in the short run from coal burning plants versus thousands of years of toxic radioactive waste on the other...how about a policy with a goal to have neither...would require incentives on innovation and revolutionary inventions that may ultimately render the energy companies obsolete. From what I understand, the energy cos are the special interest folks McCain is most interested in protecting. On energy I like Obama, on healthcare reform, I like McCain....the clock is ticking...which side to choose. egran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 I heard Obama speak at a rally a few weeks ago. He was listing off what all americans have a right to - speaking on healthcare - he said something to the effect that the millions of uninsured children in this country have a right to life-saving vaccines... It gave me chills. Made me think of mandatory, no exception vaccines for all children. From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AM I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought.____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail. yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 Did he SAY he would mandate all vaccines? - I heard Obama speak at a rally a few weeks ago. He was listing off what all americans have a right to - speaking on healthcare - he said something to the effect that the millions of uninsured children in this country have a right to life-saving vaccines... It gave me chills. Made me think of mandatory, no exception vaccines for all children. From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com> Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injured To: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) com Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AM I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought. ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 No, he didn't say he would mandate them. He was on a roll naming what he thought all americans had a right to and mentioned children should have life-saving vaccines. Obviously, he doesn't know the dangers of vaccines like we (and the pharmaceutical companies) do. From what Obama has stated about his healthcare plan, it is not universal healthcare for all of us. The very last thing we need is for the government to run and control all our healthcare. Universal healthcare destroys the quality of care when you need anything beyond GP stuff. Does Obama's healthcare plan help my child? No, if anything, I will probably have to pay more taxes to help pay for the uninsured which means I will have less money to pay for my son's needs. From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AMI'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought.____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 Mc Cain helped ONE soldier, not a civilian, just one soldier. How many other children have been injured and how many did he help? From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AM I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought.____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail. yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 Tammie, I didn't mean to imply that my perception that McCain would be more likely to 'champion the cause' so to speak, was even based on him helping that ONE soldier. What I was saying was, that given how often Obama talks about " putting money " into " preventative measures " and the type of healthcare he keeps talking about for children, which includes things like " access to life-saving vaccinations " , then if I was voting solely on the autism-vaccine issue, I would have to lean towards McCain because so far, other than the one or two comments he made many months ago, I don't feel that he would take on the vaccines, and actually, I think that his healthcare reform would involve providing even more vaccinations to children because of the 'preventative' thought of mind. He's also new enough on the scene that I really do not foresee him standing up to big pharma and the vaccine industry. He's got too much to prove and doesn't want to lose. Once in office, he'll be looking for an additional 4 years and I don't foresee him taking on big pharma, at least not in the first term. This is not to take away from any other merits that he has-- all I was saying was, on the vaccine-autism issue alone, I really don't see it changing if Obama becomes president. I could be wrong though, and I would be happily wrong if that were the case. That's why I feel like I have to look at other issues that affect me directly, and not just the autism-vaccine issue before I make up my mind one way or another. > > From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com> > Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injured > To: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) com > Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AM > > > > > I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I > hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health > care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative > measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I > can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative > care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, > then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to > examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern > is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective > vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates > result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. > > Anyway, just a thought. > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 I personally doubt very much Mc Cain will champion anything out side of the military. Hes a big farce in my book. I listened to both recent debates and found alot of what Mc Cain had to say was false. I live in NY, I have an Autistic child, I am an advocate for education,, I know NY education sucks, I am an active member in my community and all I saw was BUSH! Lie lie and more lies. As for Palin I have no respect, I have friends with special needs children with multiple disabilites, she and Mc Cain claim they know everything about Autism. Well I have one thing to say about that... " I have some land ( swamp) I'd like to sell you. Obama may not be perfect BUT Mc Cain has failed to tell the public about his so called aquiantences that ended up in jail. Yet wants Obama to tell all, Mc Cain and Palin need to tell ALL. As for Vaccines, please dont sell Obama short. He seems to understand more than you think. I find Obama doesn't tip his hat as they say, if you want to get ahead in life there are times you must not tip that hat! Even though you want to, you can't. Go to .loc.gov and type in each Senator and get there records. Look for your self.. We have another BUSH! Mc Cain is like Bush! Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarm Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 9:32 PMTammie, I didn't mean to imply that my perception that McCain would be more likely to 'champion the cause' so to speak, was even based on him helping that ONE soldier. What I was saying was, that given how often Obama talks about "putting money" into "preventative measures" and the type of healthcare he keeps talking about for children, which includes things like "access to life-saving vaccinations", then if I was voting solely on the autism-vaccine issue, I would have to lean towards McCain because so far, other than the one or two comments he made many months ago, I don't feel that he would take on the vaccines, and actually, I think that his healthcare reform would involve providing even more vaccinations to children because of the 'preventative' thought of mind. He's also new enough on the scene that I really do not foresee him standing up to big pharma and the vaccine industry. He's got too much to prove and doesn't want to lose. Once in office, he'll be looking for an additional 4 years and I don't foresee him taking on big pharma, at least not in the first term. This is not to take away from any other merits that he has-- all I was saying was, on the vaccine-autism issue alone, I really don't see it changing if Obama becomes president. I could be wrong though, and I would be happily wrong if that were the case. That's why I feel like I have to look at other issues that affect me directly, and not just the autism-vaccine issue before I make up my mind one way or another. > > From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com> > Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injured > To: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) com > Date: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AM > > > > > I'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I > hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health > care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative > measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I > can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative > care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, > then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to > examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern > is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective > vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates > result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. > > Anyway, just a thought. > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 Mandated Vaccines NO! Obama did not say that! From: merrywbee <merrywbeeyahoo (DOT) com>Subject: Re:Sen. McCain Helped Vaccine injuredTo: EOHarmyahoogroups (DOT) comDate: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:48 AMI'm still unsure as to who I will vote for, but I have to admit that I hear Obama talking alot about prevention in his talks about his health care plans. He keeps talking about how if we step up preventative measures, then over time, that cuts down on medical expenses. Well, I can't help but wonder if he is including vaccines in that 'preventative care' rhetoric, i.e. if I was choosing *solely* on the vaccine issue, then I would have to lean towards McCain as being more likely to examine the adverse events angle more closely than Obama. My concern is that Obama will be handed a bunch of information about how effective vaccines are, studies that show that increases in vaccination rates result in fewer emergency room visits, and so forth. Anyway, just a thought.____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.