Guest guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 This study seems like so much B.S.! It seems that the control group was also vaccinated, but only a few days later. Huh?? The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. One of the study's authors, Alfred Steinschneider, helped found the Institute. The study took place over only 4 days, and there was no followup afterwards. And, they only looked at apnea and bradycardia. Here's the link to the study, to see what you folks can make of it: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/121/5/e1085?maxtoshow= & HITS=10 & hits=10 & RESULTFORMAT= & fulltext=apnea+ & searchid=1 & FIRSTINDEX=0 & volume=121 & issue=5 & resourcetype=HWCIT Aasadpowell605 wrote: Preemies at no extra risk when immunizedChance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study saysMonday, May 05, 2008By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-GazettePremature infants do not face any increased risk from their first immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West Penn, said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation that 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, vaccine."We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends it," Dr. Karamchandani said. "We want to inform the public as well as the doctors that it is safe."She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP shots and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation of breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate.The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts.The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less than 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of chronological age.The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half randomly chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were analyzed by two specialists based at different sites.Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family Center of Pittsburgh also participated as a study site.Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight.But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their immunizations, the rates were not very different from the unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 percent).Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the diseases covered by the vaccine."They are in a high-risk period," she said. "They can't fight infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers."The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although the cause of SIDS is still unknown."We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to sleep ..." she said. "In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids never had apnea.""We can only prove immunization is safe for babies," she said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized Hmm.. How about *no one* at " less risk " . Do these people forget the two little sentences in the latest ACIP report, " Simultaneous vaccination has not been studied.. Simultaneous vaccinations is recommended. " Evidence-based medicine? Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 "They are in a high-risk period," she said. "They can't fight infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers." If they can't fight infections - what makes these idiots think they can "fight" a live-virus vaccine (or a dead one for that matter)? "Don't get antibodies from their mother". Umm - have we never heard of colustrum and La Leche League?Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 I guess they forgot about their previous study that concluded preemies were at a much higher risk of developing Autism. I believe that was also printed in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics just a few months ago. > > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized > Chance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study says > Monday, May 05, 2008 > By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette > > Premature infants do not face any increased risk from their first > immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western > Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of > Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. > > Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West Penn, > said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation that > 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should > receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, > vaccine. > > " We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends > it, " Dr. Karamchandani said. " We want to inform the public as well > as the doctors that it is safe. " > > She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses > because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP shots > and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation of > breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate. > > The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from > bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts. > > The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital > neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less than > 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of chronological > age. > > The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half randomly > chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were > analyzed by two specialists based at different sites. > > Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family Center of > Pittsburgh also participated as a study site. > > Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the > effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study > averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight. > > But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of > apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their > immunizations, the rates were not very different from the > unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 > percent). > > Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the > diseases covered by the vaccine. > > " They are in a high-risk period, " she said. " They can't fight > infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers. " > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although the > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids never > had apnea. " > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 These idiots forget what they write, I am convinced they make it up as they go along! Dawn wrote: > > I guess they forgot about their previous study that concluded > preemies were at a much higher risk of developing Autism. I believe > that was also printed in the journal of the American Academy of > Pediatrics just a few months ago. > > > > > > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized > > Chance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study says > > Monday, May 05, 2008 > > By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette > > > > Premature infants do not face any increased risk from their first > > immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western > > Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of > > Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. > > > > Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West Penn, > > said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation that > > 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should > > receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, > > vaccine. > > > > " We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends > > it, " Dr. Karamchandani said. " We want to inform the public as well > > as the doctors that it is safe. " > > > > She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses > > because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP shots > > and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation of > > breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate. > > > > The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from > > bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts. > > > > The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital > > neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less > than > > 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of chronological > > age. > > > > The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half > randomly > > chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were > > analyzed by two specialists based at different sites. > > > > Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family Center of > > Pittsburgh also participated as a study site. > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the > > effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study > > averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight. > > > > But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of > > apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their > > immunizations, the rates were not very different from the > > unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 > > percent). > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the > > diseases covered by the vaccine. > > > > " They are in a high-risk period, " she said. " They can't fight > > infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers. " > > > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although the > > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids > never > > had apnea. " > > > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 I actually just completed three VAERS reports for my preemie son a few months ago too. That was one of the things the questions on the form - you are asked if the child was premature, how much did he/she weigh. So, there is obviously a connection with Adverse Reactions/premature babies. > > > > > > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized > > > Chance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study says > > > Monday, May 05, 2008 > > > By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette > > > > > > Premature infants do not face any increased risk from their first > > > immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western > > > Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of > > > Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. > > > > > > Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West Penn, > > > said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation that > > > 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should > > > receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, > > > vaccine. > > > > > > " We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends > > > it, " Dr. Karamchandani said. " We want to inform the public as well > > > as the doctors that it is safe. " > > > > > > She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses > > > because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP shots > > > and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation of > > > breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate. > > > > > > The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from > > > bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts. > > > > > > The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital > > > neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less > > than > > > 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of chronological > > > age. > > > > > > The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half > > randomly > > > chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were > > > analyzed by two specialists based at different sites. > > > > > > Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family Center of > > > Pittsburgh also participated as a study site. > > > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the > > > effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study > > > averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight. > > > > > > But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of > > > apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their > > > immunizations, the rates were not very different from the > > > unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 > > > percent). > > > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the > > > diseases covered by the vaccine. > > > > > > " They are in a high-risk period, " she said. " They can't fight > > > infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers. " > > > > > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > > > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > > > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although the > > > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > > > > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > > > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids > > never > > > had apnea. " > > > > > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 A premature baby is at higher risk for a lot of things, I think these know it alls forget that. Dawn wrote: > > I actually just completed three VAERS reports for my preemie son a > few months ago too. That was one of the things the questions on the > form - you are asked if the child was premature, how much did he/she > weigh. So, there is obviously a connection with Adverse > Reactions/premature babies. > > > > > > > > > > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized > > > > Chance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study says > > > > Monday, May 05, 2008 > > > > By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette > > > > > > > > Premature infants do not face any increased risk from their > first > > > > immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western > > > > Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of > > > > Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. > > > > > > > > Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West > Penn, > > > > said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation > that > > > > 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should > > > > receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, > > > > vaccine. > > > > > > > > " We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends > > > > it, " Dr. Karamchandani said. " We want to inform the public as > well > > > > as the doctors that it is safe. " > > > > > > > > She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses > > > > because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP > shots > > > > and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation > of > > > > breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate. > > > > > > > > The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from > > > > bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts. > > > > > > > > The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital > > > > neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less > > > than > > > > 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of > chronological > > > > age. > > > > > > > > The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half > > > randomly > > > > chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were > > > > analyzed by two specialists based at different sites. > > > > > > > > Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family > Center of > > > > Pittsburgh also participated as a study site. > > > > > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the > > > > effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study > > > > averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight. > > > > > > > > But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of > > > > apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their > > > > immunizations, the rates were not very different from the > > > > unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 > > > > percent). > > > > > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the > > > > diseases covered by the vaccine. > > > > > > > > " They are in a high-risk period, " she said. " They can't fight > > > > infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers. " > > > > > > > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > > > > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > > > > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although > the > > > > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > > > > > > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > > > > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids > > > never > > > > had apnea. " > > > > > > > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 > .. preemies were at a much higher risk of developing Autism .. > printed in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics just a > few months ago. > Short memory, eh? *Childhood-onset Alzheimer's* perhaps????? (or autism, but oh no, we could possibly say *that* a-word. Can't scare the parents out of the MMR shot, or the mostly-useless-at-least-when- given mumps and rubella vaccine (source: Jepson, Chanigng the Course of Autism) Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 > A premature baby is at higher risk for a lot of things, I think these > know it alls forget that. > Oh, I think they know it.. And they use it to 'dismiss' a lot of things that otherwise would get attention and be quite alarming. Seizures 10 times a day, you ask the ped? Oh that happens a lot in kids with autism? Gut pains and horrendous stool problems? Oh, that's happens a lot in autism? Referral to a ped neurologist or GI specialist to try to figure out *what's going on and WHY*?? Never! Why would you want to do that? Autism is incurable.. Stupid peds - although they are just doing what the AAP tells them (or doesn't tell them). So *more stupid* (and criminal?) AAP leadership? *Any* way this turns out - mercury, envrionemental chemicals, vaccine immune overstimulation, mitochondrial problems or no.. There is NO way the power-that-be are going to get out of this autism mess.. " Neglecting public health " for 15+ years will be the charge at the top of the list. There is bad, and there is worse, and there is much worse for these guys. I find it highly ironic that they covered things up in the beginning on the foolish idea that it would *limit liability*. Well, that liability has now gone up - at least 10-fold. And did it so as " not to alarm the public " . Well, the public's trust is almost gone too. *GOOD JOB* CDC, FDA, AAP, IOM, etc.. You have almost destroyed yourselves in the eyes of the public. Reminds me of that line in Harry Potter 5 or 6 where Dumbledore is talking to Fudge " if you do what needs to be done now, you will go down in history as one of the bravest Ministers of Magic ever. If not.. " (paraphrase) " Tired of the (dangerous) bozos " Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 AAP-1999: "Until thimerosal-free vaccine is available, immunization for the small, prematurely born infant should be deferred until the infant reaches a size and developmental level that corresponds to the term infant (as noted above)." http://www.vaccinationnews.com/dailynews/August2001/ThimVaxIntRep.htm >> > .. preemies were at a much higher risk of developing Autism .. > > printed in the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics just a > > few months ago.> >> Short memory, eh? *Childhood-onset Alzheimer's* perhaps????? (or > autism, but oh no, we could possibly say *that* a-word. Can't scare > the parents out of the MMR shot, or the mostly-useless-at-least-when- > given mumps and rubella vaccine (source: Jepson, Chanigng the Course > of Autism)> > Jim> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Do you have a link to the previous study? I had preemies. Dawn wrote: > > I guess they forgot about their previous study that concluded > preemies were at a much higher risk of developing Autism. I believe > that was also printed in the journal of the American Academy of > Pediatrics just a few months ago. > > > > > > Preemies at no extra risk when immunized > > Chance for disease outweighs concerns, hospital study says > > Monday, May 05, 2008 > > By Jill Daly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette > > > > Premature infants do not face any increased risk from their first > > immunization, according to a study by researchers at the Western > > Pennsylvania Hospital, published today in the May issue of > > Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. > > > > Co-author Nilima Karamchandani, chief of neonatology at West Penn, > > said the results affirm the AAP's long-standing recommendation that > > 2-month-old babies, no matter how early they are born, should > > receive their diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, or DTaP, > > vaccine. > > > > " We would like the babies to get their shots when AAP recommends > > it, " Dr. Karamchandani said. " We want to inform the public as well > > as the doctors that it is safe. " > > > > She said some pediatricians had delayed the vaccine or cut doses > > because of reports of premature babies receiving their DTaP shots > > and then suffering higher rates of apnea, which is a cessation of > > breathing, and bradycardia, a slow heart rate. > > > > The doctor said the latest study sought more objective data from > > bedside monitoring equipment, analyzed by independent experts. > > > > The randomized, controlled clinical trial involved 10 hospital > > neonatal intensive care units treating 191 infants born at less > than > > 37 weeks gestational age, and enrolled at 2 months of chronological > > age. > > > > The babies with similar medical characteristics -- but half > randomly > > chosen for vaccination -- were monitored, and those results were > > analyzed by two specialists based at different sites. > > > > Besides West Penn, the Children's Home and Lemieux Family Center of > > Pittsburgh also participated as a study site. > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said she herself has been concerned about the > > effect of vaccine on some premature infants. Those in the study > > averaged about 31/2 pounds in weight. > > > > But, although the babies continued to have prolonged episodes of > > apnea (16 percent) and bradycardia (58 percent) after their > > immunizations, the rates were not very different from the > > unvaccinated group -- apnea (20 percent) and bradycardia (56 > > percent). > > > > Dr. Karamchandani said the babies should be protected from the > > diseases covered by the vaccine. > > > > " They are in a high-risk period, " she said. " They can't fight > > infections; they don't get antibodies from their mothers. " > > > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although the > > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids > never > > had apnea. " > > > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 They weren't following their protocol in 2001 when my boys got shots (with thimerosal too!) - they were less than term and less than 5 lbs - told me it was the law ... (I didn't know better and trusted them). Diane > > > AAP-1999: " Until thimerosal-free vaccine is available, immunization for > the small, prematurely born infant should be deferred until the infant > reaches a size and developmental level that corresponds to the term > infant (as noted above). " > > http://www.vaccinationnews.com/dailynews/August2001/ThimVaxIntRep.htm > <http://www.vaccinationnews.com/dailynews/August2001/ThimVaxIntRep.htm> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 > > > > > > > > The study was funded by the American SIDS Institute. Premature > > > > babies are at a higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome, as > > > > well as apnea and bradycardia, Dr. Karamchandani said, although > the > > > > cause of SIDS is still unknown. > > > > > > > > " We tell parents not to smoke, put their baby on his back to > > > > sleep ... " she said. " In most SIDS cases, 75 percent, the kids > > > never > > > > had apnea. " > > > > > > > > " We can only prove immunization is safe for babies, " she said. > > > > This study is funded by the American SIDS Institute ... man, who can you trust? This is bogus and just plain ridiculous ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.