Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 My two sons recently began at Thoughtful House in Austin with Dr. Jepson. After submitting the visits to our insurance company (Golden Rule), they were denied, along with the prescription medications he prescribed. Their letter stated that " Most knowledgeable doctors consider treatment of PDD with nutritional supplements (e.g., megavitamins, high-dose pyridoxine and magnesium, dimethylglycine, and others) and antibiotics to be experimental and investigational because the peer-reviewed medical literature does not support the use of these procedures and services in the assessment and treatment of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. " I am obviously going to fight this, and was wondering if any of you have any supporting evidence that would help my case. Are there any peer-reviewed studies I could cite? Any help would be greatly appreciated, as these are very expensive visits! BTW, the state of Texas just passed legislation that would mandate insurance companies to cover treatment for ASD for children ages 2-5 to include: (1) evaluation and assessment services; (2) applied behavior analysis; (3) behavior training and behavior management; (4) speech therapy; (5) occupational therapy; (6) physical therapy; or (7) medications or nutritional supplements used to address symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. As long as our governor doesn't veto the bill (he isn't expected to), I think this would go into effect 1/1/08 (not positive, though). In the meantime, it's me against the insurance company - and I plan to win! Thanks for your help-- Yerly Austin, TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.