Guest guest Posted May 27, 2011 Report Share Posted May 27, 2011 Make sure you ask the geneticist to do a minimum of 500 cells (not any less...they tend to only do 20 cells unless prompted otherwise) to get more accurate diagnosis. With mosaicism, the numbers will change over time, but is there are not any trisomies in one of the lines (like skin), then I would assume there won't be any later, but that assumption may be flawed because it only takes one cell to multiply and that cell might ot be detected. (Also, I read an article about late onset Down syndrome; however, I cannot find it presently.) If you want, you can visit my son's Facebook page (Charlie Hart TenEyck) and print a copy of the paper " Exclusion of Chromosomal mosaicism within 90%, 95%, and 99% Confidence Limits " and take that with you to the geneticist. Our geneticist gave it to us, along with an explanation that 20 cell counts were just not enough and that 500 cells needed to be tested in order to get results that within 99% confidence (sure they are right). Once on Charlie Hart TenEyck's Facebook page, you have to scroll down to get to the article. It is near the bottom of the page. The link is listed twice, but the papers in the 2nd post (nearer the bottom) are posted for you to click on. =)It will be listed under the topic heading : Charlie Hart TenEyck Help ENACT " Charlie Hart's Law " , which requires a minimum of 500 cells to be counted when chromosomal tests are performed in laboratories to determine a genetic condition. Anything less than 500 cells is not quantitative enough and will not rule out mosaicism. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov There are FOUR pages to print out. Let us know how the testing of the two cell lines turns out. > > Hi Allysa, > > That was NOT way too much information! Anything I can get is valuable. We have a great pediatrician who had already gotten the ball rolling with early intervention months ago, before I made any mention of DS. (Just because of the obvious hearing loss & developmental delays) I didn't think about additional local resources, so thanks for that info & I will be looking in to all of that. I want to give Caede all the opportunities that I can, but I wasn't sure what was available or where to begin looking. So again, thanks for that! And I had read that it is best to get tests done on blood and skin cells because the percentages can be varied, so we will mention that to the geneticist at children's hospital when we're there. > > Its funny that you're kids are also a year and a half apart! Caede's older sister Gracie is the polar opposite of him and pretty much does everything for him. At first that's why we thought he wasn't talking- because all he has to do is let out this little high pitched squeal and she will run & fetch whatever it is that he wants. How she knows what he wants, I have no idea, but she does! > > And you also almost miscarried during your pregnancy? I'm sorry for that and glad that your little girl made it through. In doing some of the research on MDS, I read that an increased risk of miscarriage is common when your child has DS. So I don't know if that had anything to do with it or not, but the genetics people put it on Caede's " list " of MDS symptoms when I was being interviewed. And I guess that's why this whole process isn't freaking me out as much as everybody seems to think it should. Of course, I want him to have the best life possible and be as " normal " as possible. But I'm just so glad to have him HERE after fighting so hard during the pregnancy to keep him from being born too early. And especially after losing our first boy, I'm so glad to have this beautiful boy I have now, who has blonde hair & blue eyes just like his brother. (My daughter, adversely, looks just like her father- brown skin, brown hair, brown eyes!) We've just been > praying about it a lot and we'll see what happens next, but no matter what the outcome is, we're just thrilled to have two healthy & perfect kids. > > Stevie > (Caede's Mom) > > > ________________________________ > > To: MosaicDS > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 5:49 PM > Subject: Re: Welcome New Family! > > > > > Hi , > > It is really strange - my husband immediately accepted it as well and never looked back. I was worried how he would respond since some husbands don't handle these types of situations well or harbor anger/guilt. He told me that she was his little girl and he would treat her exactly the same until he saw a need to change. He has been true to his word and treats her exactly the same as my older daughter (except for the year and a half difference in their ages). I am the one who 'watches' for anything which may need more work, meets with the ECI team, is involved with our local DS organization and takes her to places like 'My Gym' to help strengthen her muscles, etc. The funny thing is that I didn't tell the people at My Gym anything about her and they actually moved her up to the next class 4 months early because they thought she was ready. They expect more of her because they don't know any differently. I take such pride when strangers observe her > and happen to mention that her speech is good or that she is smart (when she is counting or reciting 'three little pigs'). We get such joy from her successes. > > Once you get a result, get engaged with your local Early Childhood Intervention team and get a good pediatrician (if you don't have one already). If your son does have MDS, you will want to treat him like he is full DS and have all the testing completed. ECI will help you with your local resources, provide your therapy (OT, PT, Speech and cognitive). Try to get to them ASAP so that you can get these service started right away since you will benefit and so will your child. Your local Down Syndrome association may also offer free classes like Gymboree, music classes, signing classes (for you and your child), swimming classes and I would encourage you to utilize any resources you think would help Caede. > > You sound very positive for going through this testing but it sounds like you have already been through a lot. You are probably in a much better position to deal with the news, no matter what the outcome. Strangely enough, I also thought I was losing Lexie during my pregnancy. > > Just as an aside, we received the results on the blood tests and made a choice to have her skin tested as well. The difference in percentages was 40%, so the numbers can vary drastically as well as not providing an indicator of the severity of MDS. However, we needed as much information as possible at the time for our own knowledge. I am not advocating one way or the other, but just letting you know that the skin vs. muscle vs. blood %s can vary drastically and depending on the number of cells tested, may not be very accurate. I fought hard but could not convince my hospital to test more than 50 cells which is not a good sample size. They are very good at being sneaky with their testing methods, # of cells, etc. even when specifically asked. They even provide a print out of the cells under the microscope, which you should be provided (if not, ask!). You might also want to get a copy of his medical records as I also found lots of notes from the > Geneticist that he never told me during the appointment. Beware,if you go to a geneticist, it really is only for the benefit of them collecting data and will not provide much feedback (unless you plan on having another baby). People's experiences with geneticists has been varied in the group, but many have found it to be a one way chat with you talking and asking questions and them not providing many answers. This may be because there aren't many answers to provide and also because that doesn't seem to be their role (still not completely sure what they do except collect research on your child and tell you the basics of DS). > > Wow - way too much info in one e-mail. Take what is useful and discard anything else! > > Kind Regards, > Allysa > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2011 Report Share Posted May 27, 2011 Thanks so much! Will definitely be using this. Kind of tired of doctors thinking I am a crazy hypochondriac mom... but if I don't stand up for my baby, no one else will. And the earlier we get this diagnosis, the earlier we can start working with him. I can't seem to find the facebook page that you mentioned though... maybe I am spelling it wrong. Will try again. Thanks so much for this information!!! Stevie ________________________________ To: MosaicDS Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:33 AM Subject: Re: Testing-Stevie Make sure you ask the geneticist to do a minimum of 500 cells (not any less...they tend to only do 20 cells unless prompted otherwise) to get more accurate diagnosis. With mosaicism, the numbers will change over time, but is there are not any trisomies in one of the lines (like skin), then I would assume there won't be any later, but that assumption may be flawed because it only takes one cell to multiply and that cell might ot be detected. (Also, I read an article about late onset Down syndrome; however, I cannot find it presently.) If you want, you can visit my son's Facebook page (Charlie Hart TenEyck) and print a copy of the paper " Exclusion of Chromosomal mosaicism within 90%, 95%, and 99% Confidence Limits " and take that with you to the geneticist. Our geneticist gave it to us, along with an explanation that 20 cell counts were just not enough and that 500 cells needed to be tested in order to get results that within 99% confidence (sure they are right). Once on Charlie Hart TenEyck's Facebook page, you have to scroll down to get to the article. It is near the bottom of the page. The link is listed twice, but the papers in the 2nd post (nearer the bottom) are posted for you to click on. =)It will be listed under the topic heading : Charlie Hart TenEyck Help ENACT " Charlie Hart's Law " , which requires a minimum of 500 cells to be counted when chromosomal tests are performed in laboratories to determine a genetic condition. Anything less than 500 cells is not quantitative enough and will not rule out mosaicism. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov There are FOUR pages to print out. Let us know how the testing of the two cell lines turns out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2011 Report Share Posted May 28, 2011 http://www.facebook.com/pages/Charlie-Hart-TenEyck/140524139334061 > > Thanks so much! Will definitely be using this. Kind of tired of doctors thinking I am a crazy hypochondriac mom... but if I don't stand up for my baby, no one else will. And the earlier we get this diagnosis, the earlier we can start working with him. I can't seem to find the facebook page that you mentioned though... maybe I am spelling it wrong. Will try again. Thanks so much for this information!!! > Stevie > > > ________________________________ > > To: MosaicDS > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:33 AM > Subject: Re: Testing-Stevie > > > > Make sure you ask the geneticist to do a minimum of 500 cells (not any less...they tend to only do 20 cells unless prompted otherwise) to get more accurate diagnosis. With mosaicism, the numbers will change over time, but is there are not any trisomies in one of the lines (like skin), then I would assume there won't be any later, but that assumption may be flawed because it only takes one cell to multiply and that cell might ot be detected. (Also, I read an article about late onset Down syndrome; however, I cannot find it presently.) > If you want, you can visit my son's Facebook page (Charlie Hart TenEyck) and print a copy of the paper " Exclusion of Chromosomal mosaicism within 90%, 95%, and 99% Confidence Limits " and take that with you to the geneticist. Our geneticist gave it to us, along with an explanation that 20 cell counts were just not enough and that 500 cells needed to be tested in order to get results that within 99% confidence (sure they are right). > Once on Charlie Hart TenEyck's Facebook page, you have to scroll down to get to the article. It is near the bottom of the page. The link is listed twice, but the papers in the 2nd post (nearer the bottom) are posted for you to click on. =)It will be listed under the topic heading : > Charlie Hart TenEyck > Help ENACT " Charlie Hart's Law " , which requires a minimum of 500 cells to be counted when chromosomal tests are performed in laboratories to determine a genetic condition. Anything less than 500 cells is not quantitative enough and will not rule out mosaicism. > Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use > www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov > There are FOUR pages to print out. > Let us know how the testing of the two cell lines turns out. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2011 Report Share Posted May 28, 2011 Just so you do not feel alone, my soon was misdiagnosed after birth. Emory Univ. Did the test ...only a few cells out of 20 were examined and they decided 100% trisomy 21. I called Emory all the time and they literally called me crazy and told me how wrong I was and that I must be seeing something else because their diagnosis was correct. Three and a half years later and due to my EXTREME persistence, my son got 500 cells tested and they found 50% mosaicism. Point is, I was treated so badly much like you mention except they literally called me stupid in so many words.....not just Emory but everywhere...all doctors. I was determined to help my son. Without the rediagnosis he would still not have the correct diagnosis of apraxia. They kept saying speech delay, which was wrong. I tried to tell a dozen doctors that also until one FINALLY listened. I posted the link. You should see a boy in a pink shirt on that page and you know you are on the right page. Scroll down until you see it and click on the link that is blue. You have to click on each paper/page that you see. I think there are 3 or 4 of them. If you still cannot get the link to work, then email me or FB me at my name. TenEyck > > Thanks so much! Will definitely be using this. Kind of tired of doctors thinking I am a crazy hypochondriac mom... but if I don't stand up for my baby, no one else will. And the earlier we get this diagnosis, the earlier we can start working with him. I can't seem to find the facebook page that you mentioned though... maybe I am spelling it wrong. Will try again. Thanks so much for this information!!! > Stevie > > > ________________________________ > > To: MosaicDS > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:33 AM > Subject: Re: Testing-Stevie > > > > Make sure you ask the geneticist to do a minimum of 500 cells (not any less...they tend to only do 20 cells unless prompted otherwise) to get more accurate diagnosis. With mosaicism, the numbers will change over time, but is there are not any trisomies in one of the lines (like skin), then I would assume there won't be any later, but that assumption may be flawed because it only takes one cell to multiply and that cell might ot be detected. (Also, I read an article about late onset Down syndrome; however, I cannot find it presently.) > If you want, you can visit my son's Facebook page (Charlie Hart TenEyck) and print a copy of the paper " Exclusion of Chromosomal mosaicism within 90%, 95%, and 99% Confidence Limits " and take that with you to the geneticist. Our geneticist gave it to us, along with an explanation that 20 cell counts were just not enough and that 500 cells needed to be tested in order to get results that within 99% confidence (sure they are right). > Once on Charlie Hart TenEyck's Facebook page, you have to scroll down to get to the article. It is near the bottom of the page. The link is listed twice, but the papers in the 2nd post (nearer the bottom) are posted for you to click on. =)It will be listed under the topic heading : > Charlie Hart TenEyck > Help ENACT " Charlie Hart's Law " , which requires a minimum of 500 cells to be counted when chromosomal tests are performed in laboratories to determine a genetic condition. Anything less than 500 cells is not quantitative enough and will not rule out mosaicism. > Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use > www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov > There are FOUR pages to print out. > Let us know how the testing of the two cell lines turns out. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.