Guest guest Posted July 26, 2005 Report Share Posted July 26, 2005 Kim - I provided my interpretation of what was written in your report. Sorry if many others have already written you - my computer has been getting my emails to me very late. If you have any other question - or what I said doesn't make sense - feel free to get in touch with me. McK Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:43:15 -0000 From: " ksamedifference " <ksamedifference@...> Subject: OT/ Need help with interpratation of x-ray and CT scan Here is what the ER x-rays showed...The odontoid view is suboptimal. (Bad view of the odontoid part of C2 vertebrae) The lateral view (side view) shows the cervical vertebral bodies in good alignment without evidence of compression fracture defromity or subluxation. (the bones are in-line - this is good! ) The disc spaces are fairly well maintained (with no narrowing of the discs -- discs look good). There is however, mild spurring of the endplates at C5 and C6 (the tops and bottoms of the bones have alittle bit of calcium growths on them. This is not usually a problem). The flexion and extension views demonstrate no evidence of subluxation (when you bend forward and backward - the bones are not moving - subluxing - away from where they are supposed to be - so the ligaments are proably holding up OK). The posterior (baCK) elements are intact and prevertebral soft tissue swelling is identified. There is a radiopaque density (this just says what it looks like on the x-ray) projected over the prevertebral soft tissues at the level of C3, likely representing normal variant calcification in the superior cornua of the thyroid cartilage (the radiopaque density is probably on the top of the thyroid and is likely a normal change). There is also a geometric radiopaque density projected over the occipital region, which may represent radiopaque foreign body over the soft tissues of the scalp (there is something that doesn't belong there - foreign body - over the scalp on the back of the head - the occipital bone. IMPRESSION: 1. The odontoid view is nondiagnostic (bad picture of this part of C2 so they can't tell if there is anything wrong with it). The examination otherwise shows no evidence of acute bony trauma. 2. Potential radiopaque foreign bodies versus intracranial calcification projected over the occipital region. (what they say on the back ofthe head could either be a foreign body or extra calcium growth in the bone area of the occipital bone) 3. Recommend clinical correlation. CT follow-up may be required for the delineation. (they're recommending a CT scan to determine for sure what the 'radiopaque' things are on the x-rays. My CT scan with contrast isn't ready yet and the head CT,s aren't done either. The CT scan w/o contrast states... REPORT: C1-T1 disk levels are imaged in the axial plane with 3 mm thick slices, coronal and sagittal reconstruct images are also presented for interpretation. (this just tells you that they took a picture every 3 mm from C1-T1.) Vertebral body heights and disk space alignment appear grossly normal. (normal is good - grossly - just means as a general statement - all is good!) There is some minimal disk narrowing at that level. (Slight disc space narrowing was seen - this is usually not a big deal) IMPRESSION: Vertebral body heights are unremarkable. No evidence of fracture, dislocation or any acute osseous abnormality (nothing abnormal was seen in the bones). No definite central stenosis or neural foraminal impingement is seen at any level. (where the nerves and spinal cord travels is wide open - no traffic jams - heheh. ) Note is made of some minimal posterior (back) osteophytes (excess calcium growth) seen off the C5-6 disk level in the left lateral (left - side) recess. No definite nerve root impingemant is seen. (it does not look as if the nerve roots are beign pinched off) If the patient's symptoms are in the C5-6 dermatome (if you have symptoms - decreased sensation, numbness, weakness - with the outside of the shoulder (deltoid muscle) elbow flexion/bending, wrist extnsion) , further evaluation by MRI of the cervical spine could potentially be indicated (if you have any of these symptoms in our arm, they may recommend another MRI - to make sure that the nerve is not being piched off). I have no idea on what any of it means. I think the other CT scan of the head will indicate what the occipital problem or whatever is. If anyone knows what any of this means please let me know!!!! Thanks KIM PS: I think we now know why he sent me for a CT Scan...The ER report suggested it! LOL + Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.