Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Share Posted June 27, 2001 Monday, June 25, 2001 Mold causes a difference of opinion between old friends Chesney and Hunter will face each other in court if mold suits go to trial By Elder Caller-Times Gongora/Caller-Times Todd Hunter (left) and Brent Chesney are on opposing sides of the mold issue. Hunter is a lawyer representing insurance companies and Chesney, also a lawyer, will represent the families affected by the fungus. Brent Chesney and Todd Hunter go way back. But a fungus may be coming between them. Chesney, a city councilman, ran Hunter's 1988 legislative campaign, and later became his chief of staff. When Hunter retired from his seat in the state House of Representatives in 1996 to become a lobbyist, Chesney spent some years working at his friend's law firm, helping him lobby for insurance companies. In 1999, Chesney left Hunter's law firm when he first ran for City Council. Now the two are on opposite sides of a mold mess that has spread all over Corpus Christi. " I never thought I would be going up against him, " Chesney said. Also a local attorney, Chesney represents clients with mold infested homes. Some of his clients plan to file lawsuits against insurers who have been slow to pay for their mold cleanup bills. Local attorneys and realtors estimate hundreds of local families have been forced out of their homes because of mold. Some molds, which hide under floorboards and behind walls, are considered a health hazard. Hunter's law firm, Hunter & Handel, represents insurance companies. Both attorneys are digging in for a big fight. Insurance companies have filed a request with the Texas Department of Insurance to have mold coverage removed from homeowner policies. Insurance companies contend that the premiums Texas homeowners pay on their policies don't cover the cost of mold removal. The department has yet to approve that request and is holding hearings on the matter. If insurance companies are successful in getting mold excluded from coverage, it won't affect existing claims. Hunter isn't so sure insurance companies are responsible for all mold problems. " We need to get a clarification, " Hunter said. " If there is mold, who should pay for it? Is it the insurance companies who are at fault, builders, materials, or is it anybody's fault? " Texas homeowner policies currently include coverage for a loss caused by mold or other fungi if the loss is the direct result of a covered peril, such as a burst pipe. But the fight begins when homeowners have failed to repair equipment that could cause a leak. Insurance companies estimate the cost for mold investigations can go as high as $10,000 and removal can cost another $30,000. " It's not like checking a car fender, " Hunter said. " You're dealing with certified industrial hygienists, remediation experts, possibly doctors. The cost to inspect and investigate is more expensive than companies charge for the insurance policies and it's not good business to be in a losing position. " Hunter isn't disputing that insurance companies should pay for mold cleanup if it's covered in an existing policy. But insurance companies are showing some reluctance to pay out expensive mold claims, Chesney said. While insurance companies are footing the relocation bill for some of Chesney's clients who have left their homes, they haven't been swift in cleaning up his clients' properties, he said. His clients don't want to live in hotels and rental properties, he said. While he said he hopes to mediate problems before they land in the courtroom, insurers might not leave him and other attorneys a choice. And juries sympathize with so-called mold refugees, he said. " It is a very emotional issue, " Chesney said. " Some people say, 'They're living in hotels, how much are they really suffering?' If you talk to the families, they break your heart. They don't want to live in hotels. They just want to get back into the house. This is a very emotional issue for jurors because it is a terrible thing to get kicked out of your homes. " Hunter was co-counsel for Farmers Insurance Group this month when a jury in state court in Austin awarded a family $32.1 million in a case involving allegedly extensive mold damage in their Dripping Springs house. The jury ruled that Farmers Insurance Group had failed to properly address the family's claim, among other things. Farmers Insurance officials, in a written statement, said the fight may not be over. " We heard the jury's verdict. That verdict, in effect, answers to a series of questions based on the evidence the jury was permitted to see. It is now up to the court to enter a judgment in this case. Once that is done, we will review that judgment and if an appeal is necessary we are confident we will prevail. " The expenses to clean up mold are higher than the premiums paid by policyholders, Hunter said. The public also needs to be educated about mold. Not all mold is toxic, he said and the sight of mold should not cause homeowners to panic. " There needs to be a clarified understanding of mold and what is bad and what is not bad, " said Hunter, who has spoken at seminars where all sides of the mold melee are represented. " If everybody is represented in the matter, then a good public policy can be formed, " Hunter said. While Chesney and Hunter go way back, neither plans to go easy on each other in the courtroom. " They are a hard-nosed law firm that cuts me no slack, personal relationship or not, and vice versa, " Chesney said. Hunter said mold won't damage his friendship with Chesney. " We can be friends outside the courtroom but fight for our clients inside the courtroom, " he said. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Contact Elder at 886-3678 or elderl@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.