Guest guest Posted August 5, 2001 Report Share Posted August 5, 2001 This is from Senator and explains more clearly than a lot of articles the difference between the Bush Patients Bill of Rights (compromised into with Charlie Norwood) and the generally Democratic proposal. Quoting Senator : " For the past two years, I have been an active member of a bipartisan team of senators and representatives pushing for meaningful law to protect patients. Just this past June, the Senate overwhelmingly voted 59 to 36 to pass the Bipartisan Patient Protection Act, strong and far-reaching patient protection legislation that I sponsored with Senator McCain. " On Thursday, the House passed a bill favored by President Bush that would weaken the patient protections I fought so hard for in the Senate. The differences between their bill and ours are simple: their version protects HMOs; our bill protects patients. Their version overturns already existing state laws to protect patients; our bill keeps strong state patient protection laws in place. Their version makes it too difficult for patients who've been denied care by an HMO to take that HMO to court; our bill ends the special, privileged status that gives HMOs legal immunity. " I'll continue to talk about the important differences between the Patient Protection Act that passed the Senate and the bill to protect HMOs that passed the House on NBC's Meet the Press this Sunday morning. Please check your local listing for show time. " I'll also be interviewed next Monday and Tuesday on CNN's " Inside Politics, " which airs from 5-6 p.m. EST. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.