Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 , Am I reading this correctly? Are they saying that in all but 7 of the cases, other medical conditions could be blamed for the liver failure? But then I see that they only reviewed 50 of the 134 cases of liver failure, so actually more cases could have been linked to the TNF inhibitors. I hope this will mean that they will start monitoring liver functions for those of us on TNF inhibitors. a On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:18 PM, wrote: > Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases > Volume 52, Number 8 > > > Hepatotoxicity. Recent FDA postmarketing surveillance unexpectedly > revealed > 134 spontaneous reports of liver failure associated with TNF > inhibitor use > (16,21). In a detailed review of 50 cases (receiving either > infliximab or > etanercept), confounding diagnoses or hepatoxin exposure was seen in > 43 > cases (eg, sepsis, TB, isoniazid use, alcohol, viral hepatitis, GVHD, > hepatotoxic drugs). However, in 7 cases no other cause could be > identified > suggesting that TNF inhibitor use may have lead to hepatic failure. > In the > clinical trials with infliximab and adalimumab, sporadic 2- to 3-fold > liver > function test elevations may have been attributed to the TNF > inhibitor. > > > http://www.arthritis.org/research/Bulletin/Vol52No8/Safety_Concerns.asp > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 , Am I reading this correctly? Are they saying that in all but 7 of the cases, other medical conditions could be blamed for the liver failure? But then I see that they only reviewed 50 of the 134 cases of liver failure, so actually more cases could have been linked to the TNF inhibitors. I hope this will mean that they will start monitoring liver functions for those of us on TNF inhibitors. a On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:18 PM, wrote: > Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases > Volume 52, Number 8 > > > Hepatotoxicity. Recent FDA postmarketing surveillance unexpectedly > revealed > 134 spontaneous reports of liver failure associated with TNF > inhibitor use > (16,21). In a detailed review of 50 cases (receiving either > infliximab or > etanercept), confounding diagnoses or hepatoxin exposure was seen in > 43 > cases (eg, sepsis, TB, isoniazid use, alcohol, viral hepatitis, GVHD, > hepatotoxic drugs). However, in 7 cases no other cause could be > identified > suggesting that TNF inhibitor use may have lead to hepatic failure. > In the > clinical trials with infliximab and adalimumab, sporadic 2- to 3-fold > liver > function test elevations may have been attributed to the TNF > inhibitor. > > > http://www.arthritis.org/research/Bulletin/Vol52No8/Safety_Concerns.asp > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Well, this makes me greatful that my rheumatologist checks my liver enzymes every 2 months!! No more complaints from me over that!!..Marina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Well, this makes me greatful that my rheumatologist checks my liver enzymes every 2 months!! No more complaints from me over that!!..Marina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 Yes, a, actually all of them could be linked to the TNF inhibitors, but only 50 cases were studied in detail. Of those 50, in 7 there was no other explanation for the liver failures (but that doesn't mean that the other 43 weren't, just that there were other conditions that could have explained it). That leaves 84 that they didn't closely examine. Also, since we have an abysmal system for reporting adverse reactions, it's estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent ever get reported. So multiply the number of known cases by between 10 to 100 and you may have a more accurate figure! Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Re: [ ] INFO - TNF inhibitor use and liver toxicity , Am I reading this correctly? Are they saying that in all but 7 of the cases, other medical conditions could be blamed for the liver failure? But then I see that they only reviewed 50 of the 134 cases of liver failure, so actually more cases could have been linked to the TNF inhibitors. I hope this will mean that they will start monitoring liver functions for those of us on TNF inhibitors. a On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:18 PM, wrote: > Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases > Volume 52, Number 8 > > > Hepatotoxicity. Recent FDA postmarketing surveillance unexpectedly > revealed > 134 spontaneous reports of liver failure associated with TNF > inhibitor use > (16,21). In a detailed review of 50 cases (receiving either > infliximab or > etanercept), confounding diagnoses or hepatoxin exposure was seen in > 43 > cases (eg, sepsis, TB, isoniazid use, alcohol, viral hepatitis, GVHD, > hepatotoxic drugs). However, in 7 cases no other cause could be > identified > suggesting that TNF inhibitor use may have lead to hepatic failure. > In the > clinical trials with infliximab and adalimumab, sporadic 2- to 3-fold > liver > function test elevations may have been attributed to the TNF > inhibitor. > > > http://www.arthritis.org/research/Bulletin/Vol52No8/Safety_Concerns.asp > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2005 Report Share Posted April 13, 2005 Yes, a, actually all of them could be linked to the TNF inhibitors, but only 50 cases were studied in detail. Of those 50, in 7 there was no other explanation for the liver failures (but that doesn't mean that the other 43 weren't, just that there were other conditions that could have explained it). That leaves 84 that they didn't closely examine. Also, since we have an abysmal system for reporting adverse reactions, it's estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent ever get reported. So multiply the number of known cases by between 10 to 100 and you may have a more accurate figure! Not an MD I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Re: [ ] INFO - TNF inhibitor use and liver toxicity , Am I reading this correctly? Are they saying that in all but 7 of the cases, other medical conditions could be blamed for the liver failure? But then I see that they only reviewed 50 of the 134 cases of liver failure, so actually more cases could have been linked to the TNF inhibitors. I hope this will mean that they will start monitoring liver functions for those of us on TNF inhibitors. a On Apr 11, 2005, at 7:18 PM, wrote: > Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases > Volume 52, Number 8 > > > Hepatotoxicity. Recent FDA postmarketing surveillance unexpectedly > revealed > 134 spontaneous reports of liver failure associated with TNF > inhibitor use > (16,21). In a detailed review of 50 cases (receiving either > infliximab or > etanercept), confounding diagnoses or hepatoxin exposure was seen in > 43 > cases (eg, sepsis, TB, isoniazid use, alcohol, viral hepatitis, GVHD, > hepatotoxic drugs). However, in 7 cases no other cause could be > identified > suggesting that TNF inhibitor use may have lead to hepatic failure. > In the > clinical trials with infliximab and adalimumab, sporadic 2- to 3-fold > liver > function test elevations may have been attributed to the TNF > inhibitor. > > > http://www.arthritis.org/research/Bulletin/Vol52No8/Safety_Concerns.asp > > > > > Not an MD > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 I hope this means they will add warnings to the prescribing information and make recommendations for routine liver profile tests. My old rheumy said it was only necessary to have blood tests for liver profile every 6 months while on Enbrel. My new rheumy is testing me more often, but I think it's because of the liver scare I had. a On Apr 14, 2005, at 12:06 AM, wrote: > > Yes, a, actually all of them could be linked to the TNF > inhibitors, but > only 50 cases were studied in detail. Of those 50, in 7 there was no > other > explanation for the liver failures (but that doesn't mean that the > other 43 > weren't, just that there were other conditions that could have > explained > it). > > That leaves 84 that they didn't closely examine. > > Also, since we have an abysmal system for reporting adverse reactions, > it's > estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent ever get reported. So > multiply > the number of known cases by between 10 to 100 and you may have a more > accurate figure! > > > > > Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 I hope this means they will add warnings to the prescribing information and make recommendations for routine liver profile tests. My old rheumy said it was only necessary to have blood tests for liver profile every 6 months while on Enbrel. My new rheumy is testing me more often, but I think it's because of the liver scare I had. a On Apr 14, 2005, at 12:06 AM, wrote: > > Yes, a, actually all of them could be linked to the TNF > inhibitors, but > only 50 cases were studied in detail. Of those 50, in 7 there was no > other > explanation for the liver failures (but that doesn't mean that the > other 43 > weren't, just that there were other conditions that could have > explained > it). > > That leaves 84 that they didn't closely examine. > > Also, since we have an abysmal system for reporting adverse reactions, > it's > estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent ever get reported. So > multiply > the number of known cases by between 10 to 100 and you may have a more > accurate figure! > > > > > Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.