Weighing the Difference Between Treating Pain and Dealing Drugs

[Guest guest]

March 26, 2005

EDITORIAL OBSERVER

Weighing the Difference Between Treating Pain and Dealing Drugs

By TINA ROSENBERG

ederal prosecutors in Virginia want Dr. Hurwitz, recently

convicted on 50 counts of distributing narcotics, to go to prison for

life without parole when he is sentenced in mid-April.

For the 50 million or so Americans who suffer from chronic pain, the

fate of Dr. Hurwitz should be of some interest. He is a prominent

doctor committed to aggressive treatment of pain. His behavior in some

cases was inexcusable. Patients for whom he freely provided large

prescriptions should, at the very minimum, have been given more close

supervision. But malpractice should be cause for loss of license.

Instead, Dr. Hurwitz has been prosecuted as a drug kingpin because some

patients sold their pills, although prosecutors never claimed he made a

penny from it. That sends a chilling message to doctors who treat

people with extreme pain.

Dr. Hurwitz's case involved prescriptions for opioids like OxyContin or

Vicodin. Abuse of those drugs can be a lethal problem, but the new

consensus among pain doctors is that very high doses are appropriate in

some chronic pain cases. The Drug Enforcement Administration apparently

disagrees. The Hurwitz case shows that increasingly it is the D.E.A.,

not doctors, that decides what is appropriate therapy.

Last August the D.E.A. published policies to guide doctors in treating

pain. The document said the amount or duration of pain medicine

prescribed was a physician's decision and would not by itself spark a

criminal investigation. Dr. Hurwitz's lawyers filed to introduce it as

evidence. Mysteriously, it suddenly disappeared from the D.E.A. Web

site. The agency then announced it contained " misstatements. " In

November, the agency published new guidelines that said doctors who

prescribe high dosages of opioids for long stretches are subject to

investigation.

Pain is already undertreated in America. Although pain experts estimate

that perhaps one in 10 people who suffer from chronic pain could

benefit from opioids, the vast majority will never find this out. Many

doctors won't prescribe opioids, especially in high doses. Opioids are

safe and nonaddictive if used correctly, but addictive and deadly if

crushed and injected or snorted, which defeats their time-release

mechanism.

Abuse of narcotics like OxyContin is a serious problem and has

devastated many communities. But a huge amount of OxyContin on the

street is stolen from pharmacies - 1.5 million tablets from 2001 to

2003, according to the D.E.A.

Diversion of prescriptions may account for only a small part of the

abuse, but it has brought a sadly disproportionate response from

authorities. For example, Paey, who has used a wheelchair since

a car accident in 1985 and also developed multiple sclerosis, is

serving a 25-year prison sentence in Florida for fraudulently obtaining

prescriptions for Percocet even though prosecutors acknowledged he

consumed all the pills himself.

Dozens of doctors have been charged with drug trafficking because the

D.E.A. felt they were prescribing too many pills. The Association of

American Physicians and Surgeons warns doctors to think twice before

treating pain. " Discuss the risks with your family, " it says.

One California doctor who prescribed opioids, Fisher, was charged

with five counts of murder - including that of a patient who died as a

passenger in a car accident. All charges were dropped. A doctor in

Florida, Graves, is serving 63 years for four counts of

manslaughter involving overdoses by people who either abused their

prescriptions or mixed their prescribed medicines with other drugs.

Dr. Hurwitz, a crusader for aggressive pain treatment, had a

controversial practice. More than 90 percent of his patients were

genuine, and many say he was the only doctor who quieted their chronic

pain. But his willingness to treat patients other doctors shunned,

including drug addicts, also attracted scammers. It is legal to

prescribe to addicts who are in pain, and many respected pain doctors

believe that in some cases, addiction is caused by untreated pain and

ends when the pain is controlled.

Dr. Hurwitz, who was disciplined by medical boards several times,

testified that he did dismiss 17 patients he concluded were abusing

their prescriptions and was tapering down the dosage for others. But he

also said he felt that cutting off patients was tantamount to torture,

and he did not do so without strong evidence of bad behavior.

Many of Dr. Hurwitz's colleagues believe that he was far too slow to

accept such evidence and that he should not have been practicing

medicine. But while he was blind to his patients' deceptions, there has

never been any evidence that he was part of their conspiracy. In the

prosecutors' post-trial motions, they argue that the conviction should

stand even if Dr. Hurwitz believed he was prescribing for a legitimate

medical purpose.

His prosecution seems inexplicable except as a signal to other doctors

that they can go to prison for life for being duped by their patients.

That signal is being heard - the exodus from aggressive treatment of

pain is increasing. This might marginally reduce the amount of opioids

on the street, but in the process it will sentence hundreds of

thousands of people to suffer needlessly.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy |

Search | Corrections | RSS | Help | Back to Top