Guest guest Posted February 18, 2005 Report Share Posted February 18, 2005 Vioxx gets FDA nod for comeback Panel says it, Celebrex, Bextra can be sold on market By I. Cohen & Val Brickates Kennedy, MarketWatch Last Update: 4:02 PM ET Feb. 18, 2005 WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - A U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel narrowly agreed that Merck's controversial drug Vioxx was safe enough to be sold on the market, and gave the same nod to Pfizer's Celebrex and Bextra. The 17-15 ruling paves the way for Vioxx maker Merck (MRK: news, chart, profile) to bring the painkiller back to pharmacies. On Thursday, the company said it is considering a comeback for the drug, which was pulled from shelves in September over concerns of heart risk. The news sent Merck shares skyward, up 11.5 percent to $32.15. Meeting for three days on whether Vioxx and other so-called -2 inhibitors should be on the market, panelists voted 31-1 to keep Pfizer's Celebrex -- also in the same class of drugs -- on the market. Voting was tighter on Bextra, 17-13 in favor of keeping it on the market. The news sent shares of Pfizer (PFE: news, chart, profile) higher by more than 6 percent to $26.62. All three drugs, though, were determined to cause heart risk by the panel in a unanimous vote. Vioxx, Celebrex and Bextra all have come under fire recently for being linked to a higher incidence of cardiac problems in some patients. Merck pulled Vioxx from the market after a clinical study linked long-term use to an increased rate of heart attack and stroke. The company currently faces more than 600 lawsuits over Vioxx, ranging from personal injury suits to an investigation by the Department of Justice. Analysts say Merck faced $20 billion in liability over Vioxx. While the advisory panel's vote is not a final decision by the FDA, the agency generally always heeds the recommendations of its expert panels. On Thursday, Merck researchers told FDA officials that it might consider putting the drug back on the market if regulators determine that rival pain medications such as Pfizer's Celebrex carry similar health risks. Addressing the FDA panel on Thursday, Merck research chief Kim said: " If the advisory committee and the FDA conclude that the benefits of this class outweigh the risks in some patient populations, then we would have to consider the implications of these new data given the unique benefits Vioxx offers. " Merck has maintained it believes Vioxx only causes problems after being taken for at least 18 months or in very high doses. It also asserts that the drug is of value to many pain sufferers as it doesn't cause the gastrointestinal bleeding associated with other non-steroidal painkillers. But analysts on Friday said on Friday that Vioxx's return to the market would be difficult. " We believe that there are likely to be multiple hurdles for Merck to overcome should they decide to relaunch in addition to the possibility of a positive committee outcome Friday, " said Lehman Brothers analyst in a note midday Friday. " We also note that if Merck were able to accomplish a renewal of Vioxx's presence in the market, if would likely have the effect of minimizing the liability in Vioxx litigation currently outstanding, " wrote. Earlier Thursday, a leading FDA drug reviewer testified before that Vioxx may be far more dangerous than previously believed. Graham said that after reviewing data on both Vioxx and a similar drug, Celebrex, he now believes Vioxx can trigger cardiovascular problems even at low doses. Vioxx is also known as rofecoxib. " Rofecoxib shows risks at all doses, " said Graham. He added that he suspects that the drug can cause problems even within the first week of use. Graham said he based his conclusions on a review of medical records of Vioxx and Celebrex users from the state of California's Medicaid database. I. Cohen is a reporter for MarketWatch based in Washington. Val Brickates Kennedy is a reporter for MarketWatch in Boston. http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?siteid=google & dist=googlesnap & guid =%7B77FF7A3B-DC60-4387-B9D6-59AF972B82F7%7D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.