Guest guest Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 Dear Mr. Gerrin, You are wise to be tested. Even if your PSA is in the normal range, it can be used as a benchmark for later testing. Prostate cancer growth will correlate fairly closely to the PSA tests. There is some evidence that prostate cancer have a heritable factor. This factor may even extend to daughters of men who prostate cancer. The daughters may be more at risk for breast cancer. Also if the mother has breast cancer, the sons may be more at risk for prostate cancer. There are many cancer similarities in men and women. Prostate cancer arises in the epithelial cells which line the acini or ducts of the prostate gland which produce the prostatic fluid. Breast cancer arises in the milk ducts of the breast. Both breast cancer and prostate cancer are hormone driven. For premonopausal women who have breast cancer, removal of the ovaries, or Lupron or Zoladex may help control the cancer. Castration or the same drugs may be used on a man who has advanced prostate cancer. I wish you all the bestAubrey Pilgrim, DC (Ret.) Author ofA Revolutionary Approach to Prostate Cancer-Read the original book for FREE at: http://www.prostatepointers.org/prostate/lay/apilgrim/Read new edition for FREE at http://www.cancer.prostate-help.org/capilgr.htmDr. E. Crawford is co-author of the revision Comment from user:my dad has prostate cancerim being tested this week my self im 40 just need help J Gerrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 40 is very young to have prostate cancer. It doesn't hurt to get tested though but I think you will be happy with the results. --- Manley I am 58 years old, diagnosed PCa 8-9-06 Gleason 9. hasn't gone into the bone, has spread to my lungs & bladder. Taking Casodex pills & Zoledex shots. I am convinced that my GOD and Lord Jesus Christ will heal me as a testimony to his love. 2 Chronicles 20 > > Comment from user: > my dad has prostate cancer > im being tested this week my self im 40 just need help > > J Gerrin > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 43 is also young to have advanced prostate cancer gleason 8 psa 25.4 no symptoms or treatment since diag 8 months ago. I hope you get better news than i did. My dad died of pca at age 67. he had hormone therapy and a castration 5 years prior to his death. --- Manley te: > 40 is very young to have prostate cancer. It doesn't > hurt to get > tested though but I think you will be happy with the > results. > --- > Manley > > > I am 58 years old, diagnosed PCa 8-9-06 Gleason 9. > hasn't gone into the bone, has spread to my lungs > & bladder. Taking Casodex pills & Zoledex shots. > > > > > > > > > Comment from user: > > my dad has prostate cancer > > im being tested this week my self im 40 just need > help > > > > J Gerrin > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 The ACS (American Cancer Society) recommends that you also follow up that PSA with a DRE. I had a doctor at MD tell that his opinion is men should start at 35 with PSA tests. Good luck! From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of Metcalf Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 12:03 PM To: Prostate Cancer Support Subject: New member - being tested this week Comment from user: my dad has prostate cancer im being tested this week my self im 40 just need help J Gerrin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 My hunch... as more men in their 40s are diagnosed with Gleasons above 4 or 5, the PSA recommendation will get younger. The test recommendation will lag the demographics of the disease. Relatively young women are presenting with breast cancer in numbers that would have been unimaginable 50 years ago. It wouldn't surprise me if something comparable happens with PC over the next 25 years and the PSA recommendation eventually falls to age 40 or even 35. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 The recommendation to test with PSA is limited by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. At this point in time they do not recommend testing with the following rationale: " The USPSTF found good evidence that PSA screening can detect early- stage prostate cancer but mixed and inconclusive evidence that early detection improves health outcomes. Screening is associated with important harms, including frequent false-positive results and unnecessary anxiety, biopsies, and potential complications of treatment of some cancers that may never have affected a patient's health. The USPSTF concludes that evidence is insufficient to determine whether the benefits outweigh the harms for a screened population. " Their report is dated to 2002 and although a few studies have matured further it seems they will not change their recommendations any time soon. There is targeted research to find more specific markers for PCa detection. Until then, the population at large must depend on the good use or misuse of PSA and DRE. Best regard, RalphV > > My hunch... as more men in their 40s are diagnosed with > Gleasons above 4 or 5, the PSA recommendation will get > younger. The test recommendation will lag the demographics > of the disease. Relatively young women are presenting with > breast cancer in numbers that would have been unimaginable > 50 years ago. It wouldn't surprise me if something > comparable happens with PC over the next 25 years and the > PSA recommendation eventually falls to age 40 or even 35. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2006 Report Share Posted October 23, 2006 My story for those in their 40's (or late 30's) It started with my physical in 11/04. It was the year I turned 40, so my doc measured my PSA... 8.8. He sent me to the urologist and they did a biopsy. It came back negative. 9 months later, I had my PSA measured again. This time it was 11. Another biopsy (this time he took like 16 samples!). Negative again. 9 months later, another PSA test, this time it was 13. Finally, the biopsy came back positive. They found 2 spots on the left side... Both of them were small... The larger one had a gleason score of 7 (3+4), the smaller one a gleason score of 7 (4+3). My family doctor measures PSA at 40 as a default. Lucky thing for me! The part that is a little frustrating is that it took 18months and 3 biopsies to find it. - " Chuck Till " Sent by: ProstateCancerSupport 10/23/2006 07:40 AM Please respond to ProstateCancerSupport To ProstateCancerSupport cc Subject Re: New member - being tested this week My hunch... as more men in their 40s are diagnosed with Gleasons above 4 or 5, the PSA recommendation will get younger. The test recommendation will lag the demographics of the disease. Relatively young women are presenting with breast cancer in numbers that would have been unimaginable 50 years ago. It wouldn't surprise me if something comparable happens with PC over the next 25 years and the PSA recommendation eventually falls to age 40 or even 35. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.