Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially if they don't get all the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar Tissue. And with the possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. Me Nebraska, USA mymocha@... but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I've read that also and mine has re-tethered for the 2nd time,there's to much scar tissue from the first two that the risks of going back in would only cause more problems don;'t know what other problems I think I already have them going on. Do any of the Adults that have had un tethering surgery as adults find so many more complications? I try to stay strong but I think the not knowing what lies ahead get's one mind working at times .I often wonder being I was born with SB but not affected until age 29 if it would have been easier to handle things differently if I had been affected as a infant. Though I am so thankful for those 29 yrs and 4 beautiful children including a set of twins and no complications having them nor do any have SB. Marjorie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Hi Marjorie...My 16 year old daughter is in your very same position..though she had three untetherings and each time had such significant scar tissue that the risk/benefit ratio clearly changed. She has numbness now intermittently and the nsg of course suggests now not proceeding unless she develops actual motor symptoms etc. I am thinking that one day they will surely come up with THE substance that will 100% prevent the formation of scar tissue!! Stay strong ... Randee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Yes..my understanding is also that the lipoma is always there and that is why MRI's will always show a tethered cord and that one can only judge by symptoms following the first surgery. If only we had known about the scar tissue I guess we might have waited longer for that first surgery...but...one can't predict who is going to scar significantly and who isn't..a great research project for someone! Randee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 From what I understood from the nsg who did my second surgery, they can almost never remove an entire lipoma because there are nerves tangled in it. They cut away as much as they can, but they can't tease all of the nerves out of the mass without risking serious neurological damage at levels below the lipoma. I was told lipomas almost never grow back, unless you gain a lot of weight (somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 pounds, I believe my nsg told me). " Almost never " didn't work in my case. Mine grew back, and grew back again. The most weight I have gained was 40 pounds during a pregnancy. --- Brande wrote: > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially > if they don't get all > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar > Tissue. And with the > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > Me > Nebraska, USA > mymocha@... > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Hi Abby...We knew about the scar tissue because our daughter's symptoms returned (pain and numbness down both legs) and when they went in, the cord was now tethered by the scar tissue versus the original lipoma. It is not a likely occurrence so hopefully it will never happen with your little girl. Most kids with a simple lipoma have surgery and then that is that...according to our nsg's. Randee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow back " . I dont understand that. From what I have read and heard, the lipoma is just adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips or thighs. It is not a tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where to grow. If you get fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If you get thin, the size of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a strand of lipoma, and you cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it can grow back together, unless the person gets very fat and the distance between two edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have heard over and over again from neurosurgeons. Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? Abby. > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially if they don't get all > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar Tissue. And with the > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > Me > Nebraska, USA > mymocha@... > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 When you have an un-tethering surgery, how do you know if you generate a lot of scar tissue or less scar tissue? Do you only know about it after you re-tether again? My daughter had her untethering about 3.5 months back at the age of 7 months. She is not showing any symptoms, but I was just wondering how I would know whether she is generating a lot of scar tissue or not. Thanks, Abby. > > Hi Marjorie...My 16 year old daughter is in your very same position..though > she had three untetherings and each time had such significant scar tissue that > the risk/benefit ratio clearly changed. She has numbness now > intermittently and the nsg of course suggests now not proceeding unless she develops > actual motor symptoms etc. I am thinking that one day they will surely come up > with THE substance that will 100% prevent the formation of scar tissue!! > > Stay strong ... > Randee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 , Wow, so your lipoma really did grow back? That is so disturbing to me. Perhaps it was just that since they didnt remove the lipoma completely the existing lipoma and scar tissue stuck back together? Is that possible? What does it mean when you say that the lipoma grew back? Did the lipoma know what shape and direction to grow in - ie, did it know what kind of cell it was? If it just plain adipose tissue like they say a lipoma is, how is that possible? Did they do a pathology assessment of what it was when they removed the lipoma? Maybe it had some other stuff apart from plain old fat/adipose tissues. The science of this is hard to understand. Our ns said almost exactly the same thing as yours. My daughter had a filum type lipoma - one small spaghetti like strand attaching from T12/L1 to about L3 with no nerve involvement. The ns just cut the in-between parts of the lipoma leaving a little on top and little in the bottom to minimize the incision on the dura. His logic was that the incision is going to be below the first end of lipoma, and below the conus. Since these two ends of lipomas are never going to grow back together, there is very little chance of retethering (they never say never). Hope it doesnt grow back :=( Abby. > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially > > if they don't get all > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar > > Tissue. And with the > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > Me > > Nebraska, USA > > mymocha@... > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 You read what is widely understood to be the case. Lipomas do not grow back because they are fat tissue, not " growing " tissue. I had my first surgery at 20. I asked if the lump would grow back and was told " Not unless you gain about 100 pounds " . My lipoma is right at the bottom of my back/top of my butt. I knew it was growing back because my pants were fitting funny again. I told the nsg before my second surgery that the lipoma grew back. He said no, the symptoms weren't from the lipoma growing back, but rather from scar tissue. He came to my bedside in the recovery room and said " Your lipoma grew back. " Well, no duh, do you think a woman doesn't know the shape of her butt?? It isn't supposed to happen, but sometimes it does. I don't know that grow is exactly what it does or if it just attracts fat cells and increases in size that way. I know that my lipoma is again growing. I weigh 115 pounds. I weighed 135 when they removed the lipoma 8 years ago. I know it's weird and I know it isn't the norm, but it does happen sometimes. I just don't think it's sometimes enough for them to really pay attention to (which is a good thing). --- subub_98 wrote: > I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow > back " . I dont > understand that. From what I have read and heard, > the lipoma is just > adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips or > thighs. It is not a > tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where to > grow. If you get > fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If you > get thin, the size > of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a strand of > lipoma, and you > cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it can > grow back > together, unless the person gets very fat and the > distance between two > edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have > heard over and over > again from neurosurgeons. > > Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? > > Abby. > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > especially if they don't > get all > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar > Tissue. And with the > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > Me > > Nebraska, USA > > mymocha@... > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I say " grow back " but I really don't know that it's growing the way a normal tumor would grow. It could just be collecting fat cells. Lord knows, any time I gain weight, it's my butt that gets it first. ) I don't know how it is happening. The science is wrong for growth. They did biopsy it, because they do it with anything they remove from your body, apparently. The lipoma I had from birth grew with me. Since the first time it was removed, I wasn't long done growing, I can't say if it would have kept getting bigger anyway. I just don't know. But I agree with you that it is weird, and more than just a bit annoying. I think it is also very rare and that bodes well for other people with lipoma tethers. --- subub_98 wrote: > , > > Wow, so your lipoma really did grow back? That is so > disturbing to me. > Perhaps it was just that since they didnt remove the > lipoma completely > the existing lipoma and scar tissue stuck back > together? Is that > possible? What does it mean when you say that the > lipoma grew back? > Did the lipoma know what shape and direction to grow > in - ie, did it > know what kind of cell it was? If it just plain > adipose tissue like > they say a lipoma is, how is that possible? Did they > do a pathology > assessment of what it was when they removed the > lipoma? Maybe it had > some other stuff apart from plain old fat/adipose > tissues. The science > of this is hard to understand. > > Our ns said almost exactly the same thing as yours. > My daughter had a > filum type lipoma - one small spaghetti like strand > attaching from > T12/L1 to about L3 with no nerve involvement. The ns > just cut the > in-between parts of the lipoma leaving a little on > top and little in > the bottom to minimize the incision on the dura. His > logic was that > the incision is going to be below the first end of > lipoma, and below > the conus. Since these two ends of lipomas are never > going to grow > back together, there is very little chance of > retethering (they never > say never). > > Hope it doesnt grow back :=( > > Abby. > > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > especially > > > if they don't get all > > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar > > > Tissue. And with the > > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > > > Me > > > Nebraska, USA > > > mymocha@... > > > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk > of > > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Lipoma certainly do recur in the skin. If the original lesion is not completely removed, they can grow back. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered cord/Lipo You read what is widely understood to be the case. Lipomas do not grow back because they are fat tissue, not " growing " tissue. I had my first surgery at 20. I asked if the lump would grow back and was told " Not unless you gain about 100 pounds " . My lipoma is right at the bottom of my back/top of my butt. I knew it was growing back because my pants were fitting funny again. I told the nsg before my second surgery that the lipoma grew back. He said no, the symptoms weren't from the lipoma growing back, but rather from scar tissue. He came to my bedside in the recovery room and said " Your lipoma grew back. " Well, no duh, do you think a woman doesn't know the shape of her butt?? It isn't supposed to happen, but sometimes it does. I don't know that grow is exactly what it does or if it just attracts fat cells and increases in size that way. I know that my lipoma is again growing. I weigh 115 pounds. I weighed 135 when they removed the lipoma 8 years ago. I know it's weird and I know it isn't the norm, but it does happen sometimes. I just don't think it's sometimes enough for them to really pay attention to (which is a good thing). --- subub_98 wrote: > I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow > back " . I dont > understand that. From what I have read and heard, > the lipoma is just > adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips or > thighs. It is not a > tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where to > grow. If you get > fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If you > get thin, the size > of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a strand of > lipoma, and you > cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it can > grow back > together, unless the person gets very fat and the > distance between two > edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have > heard over and over > again from neurosurgeons. > > Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? > > Abby. > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > especially if they don't > get all > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar > Tissue. And with the > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > Me > > Nebraska, USA > > mymocha@... > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I do not know about lipomas in the spinal cord, but I do know about lipomas in the skin. They are benign tumors, and they recur, if they're not completely removed. Dermatologist do not consider them normal tissue. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered cord/Lipo I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow back " . I dont understand that. From what I have read and heard, the lipoma is just adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips or thighs. It is not a tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where to grow. If you get fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If you get thin, the size of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a strand of lipoma, and you cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it can grow back together, unless the person gets very fat and the distance between two edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have heard over and over again from neurosurgeons. Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? Abby. > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially if they don't get all > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar Tissue. And with the > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > Me > Nebraska, USA > mymocha@... > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I don't know that " recur " and " grow back " are the same things, though. According to the web site at Hershey Medical Center, lipomas grow to a limited size (so they don't just keep growing and growing), but also I read if the capsule of the lipoma is left behind, it can regrow. This information is the exact opposite of what two neurosurgeons told me, but experience has shown me that they do grow back (at least mine did). Other web sites talking about lipomas seem to indicate that subcutaneous lipomas are the only type of lipomas, which we know isn't true. Perhaps the different lipomas behave differently, because just a quick look indicates to me that most sites don't discuss lipomas that occur deeper in the body (in the organs or in the spinal cord). --- Chappler wrote: > Lipoma certainly do recur in the skin. If the > original lesion is not completely removed, they can > grow back. > Ron > Re: rate of reocurring tethered > cord/Lipo > > > You read what is widely understood to be the case. > > Lipomas do not grow back because they are fat > tissue, > not " growing " tissue. I had my first surgery at > 20. I > asked if the lump would grow back and was told > " Not > unless you gain about 100 pounds " . My lipoma is > right > at the bottom of my back/top of my butt. I knew it > was growing back because my pants were fitting > funny > again. I told the nsg before my second surgery > that > the lipoma grew back. He said no, the symptoms > weren't from the lipoma growing back, but rather > from > scar tissue. He came to my bedside in the recovery > room and said " Your lipoma grew back. " Well, no > duh, > do you think a woman doesn't know the shape of her > butt?? > > It isn't supposed to happen, but sometimes it > does. I > don't know that grow is exactly what it does or if > it > just attracts fat cells and increases in size that > way. I know that my lipoma is again growing. I > weigh > 115 pounds. I weighed 135 when they removed the > lipoma 8 years ago. I know it's weird and I know > it > isn't the norm, but it does happen sometimes. I > just > don't think it's sometimes enough for them to > really > pay attention to (which is a good thing). > > > > --- subub_98 wrote: > > > I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow > > back " . I dont > > understand that. From what I have read and > heard, > > the lipoma is just > > adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips > or > > thighs. It is not a > > tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where > to > > grow. If you get > > fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If > you > > get thin, the size > > of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a > strand of > > lipoma, and you > > cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it > can > > grow back > > together, unless the person gets very fat and > the > > distance between two > > edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have > > heard over and over > > again from neurosurgeons. > > > > Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? > > > > Abby. > > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > > especially if they don't > > get all > > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the > Scar > > Tissue. And with the > > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > > > Me > > > Nebraska, USA > > > mymocha@... > > > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk > of > > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Hmm, interesting point. Now, I can truly say that I am totally confused. I wonder if the spinal cord lipoma is similar to skin lipoma. I searched google for " spinal cord lipoma grow back " , and came to this article, which says: " Lipoma or lipomyelomeningocele causes tethering due to fatty tissue connecting to the lower end of the spinal cord. This produces tethering by the attachment of the fat to the surrounding tissues of the back. It is important to recognize that the fatty tissue in a lipoma is normal fat, not tumor tissue. It is normal fat in an abnormal place. It will only grow in proportion to the remainder of the fat in the body. In the surgical procedure, the fatty tissue is disconnected from the attachment to the spinal cord and removed, thus untethering the cord. " http://neurosurgery4kids.net/tetheredspinalcord.htm I also found another link, that pertains very well to our situation. It talks about intra-spinal lipomas. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext & pid=S0004-282X2001000100023 It says: " The main purpose of surgery for lipoma is not total removal but decompression of the adjacent neural structures, since both types, extramedullary and intramedullary lipomas, are closely involved with the surrounding parenchyma and adjacent nerve roots. Subtotal removal carries no higher risk of recurrence than total removal and total removal has resulted in postoperative neurological dysfunction due to disruption of spinal cord elements. " It also says: " Histologically, lipomas are an mixture of highly vascularized lobulated fatty tissue separated by delicate connective tissue and interposed in the neural tissue. All intraspinal lipoma cells also have the same metabolic properties as normal adipocytes suggesting that intraspinal lipomas are not lipomatous tumors but hamartomatous lesions, capable of growth and regression and can be influenced by diet and weight gain " But ofcourse, then it says this :=( " It should be emphasized that if the spinal cord lipomas are asymptomatic they should be left alone. " - Abby. > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially if they don't > get all > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar Tissue. And with the > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > Me > > Nebraska, USA > > mymocha@ > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 In my case, I know the lipoma is growing because I can see it. Can you see where your daughter's lipoma is? If you can't see it, but know where it is, just watch it. Mine deforms my backside. When it was removed, my lower back was flat. As it grows, my lower back is no longer flat and my pants fit weird. You're right about what the literature says. --- subub_98 wrote: > In the end, I guess it does not matter what the > literature says. What > matters is what happens to us. I wish there was an > easy way of > monitoring the growth of lipoma - like a standard > mri every year or so > and compare that with baseline. Unfortunately in our > case, the child > is an infant, so we would have to sedate her every > time for the mri. > But atleast we would know whether the lipoma is > growing/changing or > just staying the same.. > > Abby. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > > > > especially if they don't > > > > get all > > > > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus > the > > > Scar > > > > Tissue. And with the > > > > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > > > > > > > Me > > > > > Nebraska, USA > > > > > mymocha@ > > > > > > > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher > risk > > > of > > > > > retethering? I thought I read that > somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 There are a number of different kinds of lipomas. There are even malignant versions called liposarcomas. I would probably use the term come back and recur interchangeably. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered > cord/Lipo > > > You read what is widely understood to be the case. > > Lipomas do not grow back because they are fat > tissue, > not " growing " tissue. I had my first surgery at > 20. I > asked if the lump would grow back and was told > " Not > unless you gain about 100 pounds " . My lipoma is > right > at the bottom of my back/top of my butt. I knew it > was growing back because my pants were fitting > funny > again. I told the nsg before my second surgery > that > the lipoma grew back. He said no, the symptoms > weren't from the lipoma growing back, but rather > from > scar tissue. He came to my bedside in the recovery > room and said " Your lipoma grew back. " Well, no > duh, > do you think a woman doesn't know the shape of her > butt?? > > It isn't supposed to happen, but sometimes it > does. I > don't know that grow is exactly what it does or if > it > just attracts fat cells and increases in size that > way. I know that my lipoma is again growing. I > weigh > 115 pounds. I weighed 135 when they removed the > lipoma 8 years ago. I know it's weird and I know > it > isn't the norm, but it does happen sometimes. I > just > don't think it's sometimes enough for them to > really > pay attention to (which is a good thing). > > > > --- subub_98 wrote: > > > I see messages that talk about " lipoma can grow > > back " . I dont > > understand that. From what I have read and > heard, > > the lipoma is just > > adipose tissue, just like the fat on your hips > or > > thighs. It is not a > > tumor that keeps growing. It does not know where > to > > grow. If you get > > fat, the size of the lipoma increases too. If > you > > get thin, the size > > of the lipoma decreases. So, if you have a > strand of > > lipoma, and you > > cut 2 inches off in the middle, I dont think it > can > > grow back > > together, unless the person gets very fat and > the > > distance between two > > edges is very small. Atleast this is what I have > > heard over and over > > again from neurosurgeons. > > > > Am I mistaken? Is there more to it? > > > > Abby. > > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > > especially if they don't > > get all > > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the > Scar > > Tissue. And with the > > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > > > Me > > > Nebraska, USA > > > mymocha@... > > > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk > of > > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 I suspect that the lipoma that the dermatologist sees on the surface of the skin is different from the lipoma that the neurosurgeon sees in the spinal cord area. In the skin, there is such a thing as a nevus lipomatosis. It is a collection of normal fat cells in an abnormal distribution. When it is removed to does not come back. That sounds more like what it occurs in the spinal cord. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered cord/Lipo Hmm, interesting point. Now, I can truly say that I am totally confused. I wonder if the spinal cord lipoma is similar to skin lipoma. I searched google for " spinal cord lipoma grow back " , and came to this article, which says: " Lipoma or lipomyelomeningocele causes tethering due to fatty tissue connecting to the lower end of the spinal cord. This produces tethering by the attachment of the fat to the surrounding tissues of the back. It is important to recognize that the fatty tissue in a lipoma is normal fat, not tumor tissue. It is normal fat in an abnormal place. It will only grow in proportion to the remainder of the fat in the body. In the surgical procedure, the fatty tissue is disconnected from the attachment to the spinal cord and removed, thus untethering the cord. " http://neurosurgery4kids.net/tetheredspinalcord.htm I also found another link, that pertains very well to our situation. It talks about intra-spinal lipomas. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext & pid=S0004-282X2001000100023 It says: " The main purpose of surgery for lipoma is not total removal but decompression of the adjacent neural structures, since both types, extramedullary and intramedullary lipomas, are closely involved with the surrounding parenchyma and adjacent nerve roots. Subtotal removal carries no higher risk of recurrence than total removal and total removal has resulted in postoperative neurological dysfunction due to disruption of spinal cord elements. " It also says: " Histologically, lipomas are an mixture of highly vascularized lobulated fatty tissue separated by delicate connective tissue and interposed in the neural tissue. All intraspinal lipoma cells also have the same metabolic properties as normal adipocytes suggesting that intraspinal lipomas are not lipomatous tumors but hamartomatous lesions, capable of growth and regression and can be influenced by diet and weight gain " But ofcourse, then it says this :=( " It should be emphasized that if the spinal cord lipomas are asymptomatic they should be left alone. " - Abby. > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, especially if they don't > get all > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus the Scar Tissue. And with the > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > Me > > Nebraska, USA > > mymocha@ > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher risk of > > retethering? I thought I read that somewhere? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Are you talking about the lipoma that you can see externally? How does that translate to the lipoma in the spinal canal? My dd's lipoma is deep inside her spinal canal, covered by dura. I am under the impression that the only way of watching it is via an MRI. -Abby. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking that could be a possiblity, > > > > > especially if they don't > > > > > get all > > > > > > the Lipoma removed the first time, plus > > the > > > > Scar > > > > > Tissue. And with the > > > > > > possiblity that a Lipoma can grow back. > > > > > > > > > > > > Me > > > > > > Nebraska, USA > > > > > > mymocha@ > > > > > > > > > > > > but am I right that LMC's carry a higher > > risk > > > > of > > > > > > retethering? I thought I read that > > somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Hi Ron..It sounds as if you are a MD? That is very helpful to have on this site though your field is dermatology? Randee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 I know there are many types of lipomas. I simply said that a quick search brought up sites that only talked about the subcutaneous type of lipoma, and since our lipomas don't fit that " type " , those sites don't really cover us. I said " grow back " and " recur " , not come back and recur. If most of a tumor is removed, and suddenly, it's back to its original size, would that be considered a recurrence? I always heard recurrence in terms of something that was eradicated coming back. Or something happening over and over again. So perhaps the semantics are just confusing. --- Chappler wrote: > There are a number of different kinds of lipomas. > There are even malignant versions called > liposarcomas. I would probably use the term come > back and recur interchangeably. > Ron __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 My lipoma was large enough to deform my back end. Not to be terribly graphic, where my butt crack should have ended, there was a large lump and a hemangioma. My butt crack is about two inches shorter than most people's (sorry). They assumed the lump was caused by the hemangioma, but they were wrong. The hemangioma was cauterized with dry ice when I was very little (can we just let me say a great big loud OUCH!), and it faded away. The lump was still there. Before the first removal, it stuck out from my body about two inches. The lipoma is inside my spinal canal, but it plugs up the spot where the hole in my spine is. Kind of like sticking a washcloth in a drain. When they removed it, the part of my butt that was the lump went flat. When it grew back, it stuck out again. They removed it again. It went flat. It is now beginning to stick out again. I have to guess that you can't see the spot where your daughter's lipoma is? Mine is unmistakable. I think on this list also had a lipoma that couldn't be missed. I don't know if that's the norm or not. --- subub_98 wrote: > Are you talking about the lipoma that you can see > externally? How does > that translate to the lipoma in the spinal canal? My > dd's lipoma is > deep inside her spinal canal, covered by dura. I am > under the > impression that the only way of watching it is via > an MRI. > > -Abby. > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Most doctors would use the term grow back, come back, or recur to mean that a tumor that seemed to be gone at one time is now not gone at all, but rather has returned. Truly, cancers that recur have really persisted rather than recurred. I agree that the terminology is not exact. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered cord/Lipo I know there are many types of lipomas. I simply said that a quick search brought up sites that only talked about the subcutaneous type of lipoma, and since our lipomas don't fit that " type " , those sites don't really cover us. I said " grow back " and " recur " , not come back and recur. If most of a tumor is removed, and suddenly, it's back to its original size, would that be considered a recurrence? I always heard recurrence in terms of something that was eradicated coming back. Or something happening over and over again. So perhaps the semantics are just confusing. --- Chappler wrote: > There are a number of different kinds of lipomas. > There are even malignant versions called > liposarcomas. I would probably use the term come > back and recur interchangeably. > Ron __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Your lipoma sounds like the type of lipoma that we see in dermatology. They grow back, or recur, or return with irritating regularity. Sometimes they have a capsule around them, if they do, that capsule has to be removed completely or the lipoma will grow again. Under the microscope that tissue looks like normal fat, but normal fat never behaves in this manner. Ron Re: rate of reocurring tethered cord/Lipo My lipoma was large enough to deform my back end. Not to be terribly graphic, where my butt crack should have ended, there was a large lump and a hemangioma. My butt crack is about two inches shorter than most people's (sorry). They assumed the lump was caused by the hemangioma, but they were wrong. The hemangioma was cauterized with dry ice when I was very little (can we just let me say a great big loud OUCH!), and it faded away. The lump was still there. Before the first removal, it stuck out from my body about two inches. The lipoma is inside my spinal canal, but it plugs up the spot where the hole in my spine is. Kind of like sticking a washcloth in a drain. When they removed it, the part of my butt that was the lump went flat. When it grew back, it stuck out again. They removed it again. It went flat. It is now beginning to stick out again. I have to guess that you can't see the spot where your daughter's lipoma is? Mine is unmistakable. I think on this list also had a lipoma that couldn't be missed. I don't know if that's the norm or not. --- subub_98 wrote: > Are you talking about the lipoma that you can see > externally? How does > that translate to the lipoma in the spinal canal? My > dd's lipoma is > deep inside her spinal canal, covered by dura. I am > under the > impression that the only way of watching it is via > an MRI. > > -Abby. > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2006 Report Share Posted September 19, 2006 Oh Lord, Ron...That is not the way to be special! Anyway, it is nice to know you can give your input at least in terms of the " terms " we all throw about...Randee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.